Originally Posted by Cam'ron
It is only realistic for someone who doesn't want progression. Did Lost Odessey take up 4 or so discs for the 360? Yeah I'm pretty sure games graphically and coding wise are getting bigger, not just audio wise. I'm pretty sure Blu-Ray benefits for games that are coming out sooner rather than later. But games (multi-platform) that could be bigger aren't because of the 360 and its use of DVD. If MS didn't rush out the door with their next gen system to gain market share, they might have a more advanced optical media and have been smart enough to build in a HDD on all systems.
I'm not sure what the big deal about downloading content to speed up load times is. It means load times are faster on the PS3 than the 360, damn that sucks.
Just so you know, Elixir, the point of HD is to offer something better with the hopes that people buy in to it. If companies thought like you ("oh dvd is good enough, who needs better audio?") then there would be no movement forward in development. Your responses are silly and speak to defend your inferior 360.
Fishyesque, have you played Star Ocean on the PS2? I hear it is good, I picked it up for under $7. Is it true there is a rediculous amount of ways it can end?
please, take your silly a55 to an unbiased gaming forum and watch your ridiculous arguments crumble. it is pretty much common knowledge that the 360 spanks the ps3 in exclusive content as well as multi-platform games. only a very select few developers have managed to create simultaneous releases where there wasn't a disparity between the two versions of the game (rockstar did, after they delayed GTA because of the ps3, and then the ps3 version ends up being plagued by a mysterious unknown freezing issue on the ps3 anyway) why didn't you bring that up? instead, you choose to single out a developer developing a sony property to talk about the 360 hindering a game. a game not yet proven worth a damn , from an unproven dev team. lol
i mean look what you did to strengthen your other argument- bluray has yet to be used at all for gaming, MGS4 is supposedly going to be the only one to do something useful with the space, wonderful- you rather get hit hard on the memory side in order to have about the same loading speed as a default 360? i mean that's just moronic but hey that is what fanboys do.
i have a friend with a ps3, he downloads the mandatory update for 90% of his games. he's a very active user with lots of songs, extra content on his machine and he has to always go back and delete the updates in order to have sufficient space. thats a hassle.
you dont see me here defending the poor quality of the initial 360's that were out, f/ck microsoft for putting out faulty consoles. i wont deny it, i wont hide it, but damn if anyone in here is licking boot it's definitely you bud.
the PS3 is all about the future, all about potential, that just seems to drag on forever. f/ck, by time the "future" gets here everyone will have hopped on to the next gen lol. so, go ahead eat the bluray costs, eat the ps3 costs, hold on tight little fanboy, hold on. i'm sure the ps3 will eventually sometime in the "future" become the unit you want and expect it to be.
in the meantime i'll enjoy the best games on the best console, thanks.
once the ps3 gets where it's been saying it will be i'll be in line to get one if the price is reasonable. just like i'd jump on to bluray if they offered a cheaper player, but they wont will they? they know the ps3 hangs in the balance of whether or not bluray takes off.