Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gatesbasher 
We already have lossless compression at about 50 to one. On every DVD. For 1080x1920 we need about 6 times the capacity. That's why we had to have Blu-Ray instead of the miserable HD-DVD halfway-house format. If you want to see 1080i video with lossless compression, just pull it off the air. That's why it's better than HD on cable. A 2-hour movie in 1080p is about 25 GB. By some fantastic coincidence, that's one layer of a Blu-Ray disc. Of course, even with cable internet, that would take almost 10 hours to download. Which was my point.
That is
completely wrong.
DVDs are pretty heavily compressed. Bluray and HDDVD are compressed. Broadcast hdtv is compressed.
I'm not sure what gave you the idea that any of those formats are uncompressed, but none of them are, I don't think there has ever been an uncompressed consumer digital video format.
Uncompressed HDTV takes up hundreds of gigs per hour.
720p HDTV uncompressed;
8 bit @ 1280 x 720 @ 59.94field = 105 MB per/sec, or 370 GB per/hr.
10 bit @ 1280 x 720 @ 59.94field = 140 MB per/sec, or 494 GB per/hr.
http://www.colorlab.com/telecine/colorlab_HD_guide.pdf
And based on the rest of your post, I assume you're wrong about 50 to 1 lossless video compresson? Or do you have a source on that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gatesbasher 
The video signal on a DVD can be compressed to about 2% of its original size (losslessly,) better than the about 3% of a JPEG still photo, because there's a great deal of redundancy from frame to frame.
It can be compressed that much, but it's definitely not lossless. If DVDs had lossless video, why do we see compression artifacts (you can see them on HD discs as well).
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gatesbasher 
The video signal on a DVD can be compressed to about 2% of its original size (losslessly,) better than the about 3% of a JPEG still photo, because there's a great deal of redundancy from frame to frame. Digital cable is compressed further (at best about another 2x) because they want to fit as many channels in as possible. That's why no one uses that lossless one-hour mode on their DVD recorders. The 2 hr. mode is about equal to the quality you're getting over cable. Of course some of the channels they consider less important (which I watch all the time) are really severely compressed (worse than the 8-hour mode on my recorder. (Curse Comcast!)
The audio on a DVD is of course, extremely lossy: 5-channel CD-quality audio would be 3,528,000 bps. Almost as much as the video.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gatesbasher 
This depends on what you mean by "the original." I agree that on a DVD for example, "unnecessary information" has been discarded between the master tape and your TV screen.
That's exactly how lossy is defined. You just said that DVDs are lossy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Gatesbasher 
Download a 640x480 .jpg picture from a web page sometime: you'll find it's been compressed from its original 640x480x24=7,372,800 bits (900 KB) to about 28 KB, ~3% of its original size--
losslessly.
Nobody is arguing that it's not way smaller than the uncompressed version. You just have the flawed notion that it's lossless, not sure what gave you that mistaken idea. WHY do you think that is lossless and not lossy?
Lossless means that the image is exactly the same as the original, meaning you can see zero difference from the original (not the case with any consumer video format) and that you can convert the compressed file back into an uncompressed form and it will be bit for bit identical to the original.
Find an uncompressed picture file and convert it to 3% of its original size with JPG. If you compare the two, you will see differences, especially if you zoom in. And if you convert that JPG into the original file format, if it were uncompressed you'd end up with the exact file you started with, identical to the last bit. That won't happen.
JPEG is defined as a lossy format:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jpeg
mpeg2 used on DVD is defined as a lossy format:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPEG-2