AppleInsider › Forums › Mac Hardware › Future Apple Hardware › Why the all new MacBook Pro has been delayed
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Why the all new MacBook Pro has been delayed

post #1 of 100
Thread Starter 
The all new MacBook Pro was meant to make its debut at MacWorld in January.

The big story was meant to be that while 2007 was all about the iPhone, 2008 would see Apple return to its roots: computers.

Steve Jobs had planned to reveal a brand new 17" MacBook Pro, a brand new 15" MacBook Pro, (and, if my source is correct, there was even meant to be a brand new 13" model, but it isn't clear whether this was MacBook Pro or MacBook - but it is definitely aluminium). Having introduced these machines, the "...and just one more little thing." was meant to be the MacBook Air.

All of these machines feature the gesture touchpad, new keyboard, LED screens and super-sleek thinner case designs, longer battery life, lower weight than the existing line-up and 802.11n WiFi capabilities.

What screwed up the launch was the manufacturing problem Intel is having with Penryn processors using the new 45Nm process. THEY STILL HAVEN'T YET SHIPPED IN VOLUME.

Given that Leopard 10.5.2 wasn't ready either, the decision to pull the launch was made as a delay between announcement and launch would have killed Mac sales. As things stand, Apple will not launch any revised laptops until Penryn is up and running. That is expected to happen later this week or next week.

For these reasons, Apple is holding a special event in February which will include the iPhone SDK but no 3G iPhone yet.

Apparently, the decision to pull the launch of the revised range was only taken just before the MacWorld Conference and SJ was not amused. Fortunately, the MacBook Air uses a unique processor that was ready in time so this was unaffected by the penryn problem.

So, be patient, friends, new MBPs are coming. The delay isn't Apple's fault.

By all accounts, we'll all be delighted when these machines show-up. They'll be worth their WAIT in Gold.
post #2 of 100
and your sources are...
sounds good, but i'll believe the "thinner case design" when i see it.
there's too much speculation floating around.
post #3 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tailpipe View Post

The all new MacBook Pro was meant to make its debut at MacWorld in January.

The big story was meant to be that while 2007 was all about the iPhone, 2008 would see Apple return to its roots: computers.

Possibly. Like many rumors it does sound good.
Quote:

Steve Jobs had planned to reveal a brand new 17" MacBook Pro, a brand new 15" MacBook Pro, (and, if my source is correct, there was even meant to be a brand new 13" model, but it isn't clear whether this was MacBook Pro or MacBook - but it is definitely aluminium). Having introduced these machines, the "...and just one more little thing." was meant to be the MacBook Air.

Well one thing that is obvious is that the keynote was a bit short.
Quote:

All of these machines feature the gesture touchpad, new keyboard, LED screens and super-sleek thinner case designs, longer battery life, lower weight than the existing line-up and 802.11n WiFi capabilities.

Sounds nice!
Quote:

What screwed up the launch was the manufacturing problem Intel is having with Penryn processors using the new 45Nm process. THEY STILL HAVEN'T YET SHIPPED IN VOLUME.

Yes Intel has been having problems with the design or process, I've forgotten which. This is public knowledge and apparently only impacts Intel's fastest versions.

What I find funny here is not that Intel is having problems with its next gen processor but that the world seems to move on for them without concern. AMD on the other hand is getting skewered for similar issues with Phenom. I guess there is no justice in this world if you are a favored Apple supplier.
Quote:

Given that Leopard 10.5.2 wasn't ready either, the decision to pull the launch was made as a delay between announcement and launch would have killed Mac sales. As things stand, Apple will not launch any revised laptops until Penryn is up and running. That is expected to happen later this week or next week.

If they are ready this soon that is actually a good thing. Penryn should make for very interesting laptops or for that matter desktops.
Quote:

For these reasons, Apple is holding a special event in February which will include the iPhone SDK but no 3G iPhone yet.

Well yeah that has been expected for months.
Quote:

Apparently, the decision to pull the launch of the revised range was only taken just before the MacWorld Conference and SJ was not amused. Fortunately, the MacBook Air uses a unique processor that was ready in time so this was unaffected by the penryn problem.

Yeah I think it is called CORE 2. If I was Jobs I wouldn't be amused either as this will cost them money and more whining from the faithful. Plus the stability of Penryn as a platform will be in question for some time. At least they still are with the leading processor manufacture.
Quote:

So, be patient, friends, new MBPs are coming. The delay isn't Apple's fault.

When there is a delay whose fault it is doesn't really matter. Meeting customer expectations and delivering product on time is key to good business. The unfortunate part here is that customer expectations come not form Apple but from Rumor sites such as this.
Quote:

By all accounts, we'll all be delighted when these machines show-up. They'll be worth their WAIT in Gold.

Well yeah they always say that, and AIR has been sold that way. Not that I disagree either as there is a lot of great technology, that seems to be hitting the streets all at once, that could go into these new pro machines. The flip side of that is another round of generation one (1) machines. Considering this maybe these would be best considered as early adopter machines.

dave
post #4 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by shawnathan View Post

and your sources are...

I don't know the guy and certainly don't know the source but the Intel related hardware issues are public knowledge. Well at least to a certain extent.
Quote:

sounds good, but i'll believe the "thinner case design" when i see it.

A thinner case is actually the easiest component above to believe. Just by going to LED back lighting they should win a mm or too right there.
Quote:
there's too much speculation floating around.

Well yeah that is because it is pretty obvious that plans where changed at the last minute for MWSF. I'm actually impressed that they pulled it off as well as they did.

What I'm going to wonder about is just how good the small machine will be and will all the current AIR purchasers be disappointed with their new machines.

Dave
post #5 of 100
Must say that a lot of posts like this have appeard in last weeks, my ass hurts a little because of all that screwing around that MBP.

One thing is certain, all that waiting will pay-off........................eventually
post #6 of 100
Well I certainly agree, if there's a Macbook Pro 13" in the pipes, then I definitely foresee people saying nay to the Air, and focusing on a machine with a superdrive. (which seems to be everyone's biggest beef besides the price)
post #7 of 100
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by shawnathan View Post

and your sources are...
sounds good, but i'll believe the "thinner case design" when i see it.
there's too much speculation floating around.

I work in the investment community in London and follow tech stocks very closely. We may be in London, but we know everyone in Redmond, Cupertino, San Jose, and Palo Alto. And if we don't know someone directly, we can always find someone who does. I also know Brits who work at Apple, although I quickly add that it is more than their job's worth to spill the beans. (That said, they do occasionally and unintentionally reveal things they shouldn't!)

BTW, by all accounts screen and cover are thinner, but the depth has been reduced by the new keyboard. I think it is around 2cm thick now versus 2.5 cm, but no confirmed word on exact revised dimensions.

Don't take my word on anything I've said here. Just wait and see. We're now talking just a matter of days.
post #8 of 100
just wonderin' and it sounds awesome.
I'm excited, now all they need to do is release it.
post #9 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tailpipe View Post

The all new MacBook Pro was meant to make its debut at MacWorld in January.

The big story was meant to be that while 2007 was all about the iPhone, 2008 would see Apple return to its roots: computers.

Steve Jobs had planned to reveal a brand new 17" MacBook Pro, a brand new 15" MacBook Pro, (and, if my source is correct, there was even meant to be a brand new 13" model, but it isn't clear whether this was MacBook Pro or MacBook - but it is definitely aluminium). Having introduced these machines, the "...and just one more little thing." was meant to be the MacBook Air.

All of these machines feature the gesture touchpad, new keyboard, LED screens and super-sleek thinner case designs, longer battery life, lower weight than the existing line-up and 802.11n WiFi capabilities.

What screwed up the launch was the manufacturing problem Intel is having with Penryn processors using the new 45Nm process. THEY STILL HAVEN'T YET SHIPPED IN VOLUME.

Given that Leopard 10.5.2 wasn't ready either, the decision to pull the launch was made as a delay between announcement and launch would have killed Mac sales. As things stand, Apple will not launch any revised laptops until Penryn is up and running. That is expected to happen later this week or next week.

For these reasons, Apple is holding a special event in February which will include the iPhone SDK but no 3G iPhone yet.

Apparently, the decision to pull the launch of the revised range was only taken just before the MacWorld Conference and SJ was not amused. Fortunately, the MacBook Air uses a unique processor that was ready in time so this was unaffected by the penryn problem.

So, be patient, friends, new MBPs are coming. The delay isn't Apple's fault.

By all accounts, we'll all be delighted when these machines show-up. They'll be worth their WAIT in Gold.

DUDE!! What about Intel's silverthorne?? Can you find out from your source if the mac touch is delayed too until Intel ships silverthorne in volume just as the penryn shipments effected the macbooks??

Please let me know??
post #10 of 100
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by shawnathan View Post

and your sources are...
sounds good, but i'll believe the "thinner case design" when i see it.
there's too much speculation floating around.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Olternaut View Post

DUDE!! What about Intel's silverthorne?? Can you find out from your source if the mac touch is delayed too until Intel ships silverthorne in volume just as the penryn shipments effected the macbooks??

Please let me know??

There is no reliable info on Apple's plans for Silverthorne yet. The only reports have come from Appleinsider and are based on Intel Press Releases. The latest speculation is that Apple will use Silverthorne in a range of products to include a larger touch tablet, (aka Newton Take 2), a game machine and possibly a 3G iPhone. For sure, Apple is developing some kind of MacTouch product that looks like a bigger iPhone/ iPod Touch, but whatever it is, I doubt we'll see it this side of macWorld 2009. I also doubt that Silverthorne will be used in the 3G iPhone because it uses way too much power.

For me the interesting future Intel chip isn't Silverthorne but Moorestown. This should feature in some future iPhone and offer 3G speed with ultra-low power consumption.

I know that Apple is experimenting with MacBooks that have a touch keyboard instead of a regular one. The prototype is like opening a MacBook with two screens. In addition to traditional QWERTY keys, it allows commands and program menus to be embedded in the keyboard leaving the manin screen free of menus etc. it has all kinds of implications for form factors. Ultra cool, but still some way from production.

If you really want to crystal ball gaze, the hot hot future tech comes when we finally get an intel processor that enables 100% accurate speech recognition. That day is drawing closer.

Going back to this thread, 2008 is about Apple's core laptop range. They have to refresh it to remain competitive. It is the primary driver of enormous cash flow and so is an urgent priority.
post #11 of 100
this guy is just another one of those fakes out there who try to hype people up. Guys I can tell you now, its not coming till April. Not March, but probably in April. It won't even show up in that February event.


His first post was on 02-01-2008 @ 11:12 AM:

"This info comes to you from London via an Englishman working at Apple, (and there are more than you think ;-))

A revised MacBook Pro with a Leopard 10.5.2 update was meant to debut at MacWorld but neither was ready.

The delay for the MBP was caused by Intel Penryn processors not being available due to some production glitch. As we all know, Apple doesn't like to announce products too far ahead of their shipping dates - with the notable exception of the iPhone - so decided to delay the launch. Penryn-based PCs now good to go and begin shipping Monday.

Expect new MBP 15-inch and 17-inch within two weeks. 17-inch gets LED.
New MBP DOES feature a slightly revised case design with the new black keyboard from MBA and a larger trackpad, but is basically very similar to existing design. Think evolution not revolution.

The idea is to achieve a commonality of look across the range.
SSD will be an option offering an exceptionally fast boot time < 30 seconds.
Also seen lurking in the corridors of Cupertino was an aluminum MacBook 13". Initially available in silver, my source reckons anodized black, blue, pink and other colours will be available around September. New MacBooks will be a big story later this year. One of the range (I don't know which, maybe the black one) will have a superior spec that basically makes it a MacBook Pro 13"."

Reference: http://forums.appleinsider.com/showthread.php?t=83903

His second post was today, @ 11:17 AM

"The all new MacBook Pro was meant to make its debut at MacWorld in January. The big story was meant to be that while 2007 was all about the iPhone, 2008 would see Apple return to its roots: computers. Steve Jobs had planned to reveal a brand new 17" MacBook Pro, a brand new 15" MacBook Pro, (and, if my source is correct, there was even meant to be a brand new 13" model, but it isn't clear whether this was MacBook Pro or MacBook - but it is definitely aluminum). Having introduced these machines, the "...and just one more little thing." was meant to be the MacBook Air.

All of these machines feature the gesture touchpad, new keyboard, LED screens and super-sleek thinner case designs, longer battery life, lower weight than the existing line-up and 802.11n WiFi capabilities. What screwed up the launch was the manufacturing problem Intel is having with Penryn processors using the new 45Nm process. THEY STILL HAVEN'T YET SHIPPED IN VOLUME. Given that Leopard 10.5.2 wasn't ready either, the decision to pull the launch was made as a delay between announcement and launch would have killed Mac sales. As things stand, Apple will not launch any revised laptops until Penryn is up and running. That is expected to happen later this week or next week.

For these reasons, Apple is holding a special event in February which will include the iPhone SDK but no 3G iPhone yet.

Apparently, the decision to pull the launch of the revised range was only taken just before the MacWorld Conference and SJ was not amused. Fortunately, the MacBook Air uses a unique processor that was ready in time so this was unaffected by the penryn problem.
So, be patient, friends, new MBPs are coming. The delay isn't Apple's fault.
By all accounts, we'll all be delighted when these machines show-up. They'll be worth their WAIT in Gold."

Reference: http://forums.appleinsider.com/showthread.php?t=84319

Now let me ask you all one question, can anyone provide proof that Intel's new mobile chip has shipped in volume? (While some manufacturers claim the laptops with the new chips are in stock, I have yet to see any ship and there are only one or two reviews on Penryn based laptops thus far).
post #12 of 100
Perhaps there is some sort of agreement among manufactures (Dell, Apple, HP, etc.) to release Penryn-based laptops on the same day?
post #13 of 100
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebeat View Post

this guy is just another one of those fakes out there who try to hype people up. Guys I can tell you now, its not coming till April. Not March, but probably in April. It won't even show up in that February event.


His first post was on 02-01-2008 @ 11:12 AM:

Prepare to eat your words. I shall expect a grovelling aopology.
post #14 of 100
i'm really wondering here guys. How long do we still have to wait before the new MBP comes out?
i'm starting to get sick off all the waiting
post #15 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by samoske View Post

i'm really wondering here guys. How long do we still have to wait before the new MBP comes out?
i'm starting to get sick off all the waiting


Word.
post #16 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tailpipe View Post

There is no reliable info on Apple's plans for Silverthorne yet. The only reports have come from Appleinsider and are based on Intel Press Releases. The latest speculation is that Apple will use Silverthorne in a range of products to include a larger touch tablet, (aka Newton Take 2), a game machine and possibly a 3G iPhone. For sure, Apple is developing some kind of MacTouch product that looks like a bigger iPhone/ iPod Touch, but whatever it is, I doubt we'll see it this side of macWorld 2009. I also doubt that Silverthorne will be used in the 3G iPhone because it uses way too much power.

For me the interesting future Intel chip isn't Silverthorne but Moorestown. This should feature in some future iPhone and offer 3G speed with ultra-low power consumption.

I know that Apple is experimenting with MacBooks that have a touch keyboard instead of a regular one. The prototype is like opening a MacBook with two screens. In addition to traditional QWERTY keys, it allows commands and program menus to be embedded in the keyboard leaving the manin screen free of menus etc. it has all kinds of implications for form factors. Ultra cool, but still some way from production.

If you really want to crystal ball gaze, the hot hot future tech comes when we finally get an intel processor that enables 100% accurate speech recognition. That day is drawing closer.

Going back to this thread, 2008 is about Apple's core laptop range. They have to refresh it to remain competitive. It is the primary driver of enormous cash flow and so is an urgent priority.

ARGH!!!! Your wrong!!! We will get the MACTOUCH THIS YEAR!!!!

EDIT: Ok..............I've calmed down now.
Anyways, I had already thought that as a possiblity of the direction they might take their multitouch.....into full keyboards. For that needed feedback they might possibly employ that patent they have on multitouch surfaces with the ability to physically raise each pixel like braille. So in theory, in a "keyboard" mode you would have the key display with keys thats raised so it would feel like a real key. Imagine physical keys that can be configured on the fly that would disappear or appear according to how its programmed.
Good stuff
post #17 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by samoske View Post

i'm really wondering here guys. How long do we still have to wait before the new MBP comes out?
i'm starting to get sick off all the waiting

i'm sick of waiting too
post #18 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tailpipe View Post

Prepare to eat your words. I shall expect a grovelling aopology.

bring it on, I'll even give it a month, if its true I will owe you an apology.
post #19 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tailpipe View Post

Prepare to eat your words. I shall expect a grovelling aopology.

can we get a little bit of proof...please, because I for one am somewhat convinced.
post #20 of 100
Tailpipe,

Are you explicitly saying that you believe new MBP's will be released at this as yet unconfirmed event on the 26th?

I was about to go out and buy one, but I'll give it a couple of more weeks.

The only thing that doesn't really gel with me is that if they are released then and at the same time as the SDK, they'll overshadow the SDK won't they?

I reckon if we see the SDK next Tues, you could be right for the MBP on the 26th.

Anyway, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt for now...
post #21 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by yellowsoul View Post

can we get a little bit of proof...please, because I for one am somewhat convinced.

I don't see how we'll get proof, do you want spy photos smuggled out of Cupertino?

Bottom line, it has been 8 months... an update delayed due to penryn is the most obvious conclusion I'm believing in right now. Apple is not going to go a year without updating their most profitable product line, I agree and believe they would have done it by now if they didn't have their hands tied due to some external force.

-K
MBP 15.4" Early 2008
ARRIVES THURSDAY: 24" iMac 3.06ghz
iPhone 3G 16gb
PowerBook 2400 (RIP)
PowerBook G4 (Moth-balled)
Reply
MBP 15.4" Early 2008
ARRIVES THURSDAY: 24" iMac 3.06ghz
iPhone 3G 16gb
PowerBook 2400 (RIP)
PowerBook G4 (Moth-balled)
Reply
post #22 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebeat View Post

...
Now let me ask you all one question, can anyone provide proof that Intel's new mobile chip has shipped in volume? (While some manufacturers claim the laptops with the new chips are in stock, I have yet to see any ship and there are only one or two reviews on Penryn based laptops thus far).

If you purchase your laptop from the manufacturer (Sony, HP, Dell), you could get it almost immediately (after the build date and shipping of course). Retailers do not have the Penryn models because they are still in progress of clearing the Merom based models from their stock. Also, to the retailers there have been no new models released, just CPU updates to existing models.

Here are some reviews from people who have bought Penryn based laptops and have been enjoying them for some time now:
Toshiba Qosmio G45 Penryn Review
Sager NP5793 Review
Zepto Znote 6224W

Apple is always first on the list to receive their Intel CPU stock ahead of the PC manufacturers. They had stock of Xeon 5400s ahead of others but were late to the game with their Mac Pro updates, almost 2 months after the competition.

I truly doubt that the problem has anything to do with the Penryn supply. The above info is based on personal investigations at manufacturers build+ship websites and info from the OEMs themselves. I believe currently the problem is internal to Apple themselves and not Intel.

-Ad
post #23 of 100
Quote:
Apple is always first on the list to receive their Intel CPU stock ahead of the PC manufacturers. They had stock of Xeon 5400s ahead of others but were late to the game with their Mac Pro updates, almost 2 months after the competition.


-Ad

HAHAHA, NOT EVEN CLOSE! Who got the Core 2 Duo's first? NOT APPLE. Who got the Core Duo's first? NOT APPLE. LOL they got the stuff LAST
post #24 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebeat View Post

HAHAHA, NOT EVEN CLOSE! Who got the Core 2 Duo's first? NOT APPLE. Who got the Core Duo's first? NOT APPLE. LOL they got the stuff LAST

I think you are confused between getting supplies first and releasing a product with it.
Apple has always been late to the game, but its not because of getting their supply late.

-Ad
post #25 of 100
i hv been waiting for new mbp pro for 2months. anyone neos when the new mbp out?
i'm going back asutralia on 20th. i want to get a mbp before i leave (coz the prize on HK mac store almost 30% cheaper than australia store).
post #26 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tailpipe View Post

Prepare to eat your words. I shall expect a grovelling aopology.

This is shaping up to be fun.
post #27 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by SwitchyMcSwitcher View Post

Perhaps there is some sort of agreement among manufactures (Dell, Apple, HP, etc.) to release Penryn-based laptops on the same day?

Not a snowballs chance in HELL!

This is the computer industry, and as with all other industries, whoever gets there first wins.

Now, I know that "wins" isn't exactly a great term for it, but whoever gets there first gets first crack at selling the newest technology and making as much money as possible before everyone else gets it.

And that is how it's done.
post #28 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebeat View Post

this guy is just another one of those fakes out there who try to hype people up. Guys I can tell you now, its not coming till April. Not March, but probably in April. It won't even show up in that February event.

<snip>

I think you're right. I remember going through something like this last year when shopping for my Santa Rosa MBP. Hype started early in the year much like we're doing now and I took delivery in June on the first day of availability. But that was new architecture/LED display and more. I'm shopping for a Mac for my wife this time and wishing it would come sooner but I think April or May is more likely.

A new processor and multi-touch will require testing and firmware development. If the processor is not yet shipping to mainstream PC makers, we're looking at months not weeks. I'll need to buy before then.
post #29 of 100
So what if the delay is because of intel. It's going on for weeks now , when are they going to solve it? I think apple should at least say something about to the publice to ease the minds of the mob
post #30 of 100
deleted - posted in wrong thread
A good brain ain't diddly if you don't have the facts
Reply
A good brain ain't diddly if you don't have the facts
Reply
post #31 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by samoske View Post

So what if the delay is because of intel. It's going on for weeks now , when are they going to solve it? I think apple should at least say something about to the publice to ease the minds of the mob

Yeah: "Sorry guys, we can't release the unannounced MBP yet, because Intel can't deliver those penryn chips..."

post #32 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by faxthat View Post

I think you're right. I remember going through something like this last year when shopping for my Santa Rosa MBP. Hype started early in the year much like we're doing now and I took delivery in June on the first day of availability. But that was new architecture/LED display and more. I'm shopping for a Mac for my wife this time and wishing it would come sooner but I think April or May is more likely.

A new processor and multi-touch will require testing and firmware development. If the processor is not yet shipping to mainstream PC makers, we're looking at months not weeks. I'll need to buy before then.

and could you tell me the reason why we saw the MBP 4.1 battery log? I think they will release it this tues..
post #33 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by faxthat View Post

<snip>
A new processor and multi-touch will require testing and firmware development. If the processor is not yet shipping to mainstream PC makers, we're looking at months not weeks. I'll need to buy before then.

Why would they need to develop firmware for the multi-touch technology that is already available on the MBA ?

Also with respect to the "new" processor.... I would imagine Apple is at the stage where they have done all the testing they need to on the processor, they are probably waiting to start installing them.
post #34 of 100
It appears as though this Engadget story posted back on the day of the Macworld keynote is likely the reason why have not seen a MacBook Pro update yet.
You think Im an arrogant [expletive] who thinks hes above the law, and I think youre a slime bucket who gets most of his facts wrong. Steve Jobs
Reply
You think Im an arrogant [expletive] who thinks hes above the law, and I think youre a slime bucket who gets most of his facts wrong. Steve Jobs
Reply
post #35 of 100
I just received a 30 inch Cinema display for Valentine's Day. I hope the new MBP's come out soon so I can actually use it. Apparently the max res is only 1280x800 when using it with my regular Macbook.
post #36 of 100
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DHagan4755 View Post

It appears as though this Engadget story posted back on the day of the Macworld keynote is likely the reason why have not seen a MacBook Pro update yet.

This is absolutely right.

Part of the problem is the lack of reliable info from Intel about the cause of the delay. The first Penryn machines were meant to debut the week of MacWorld and while some new models are starting to appear, there was stillsome kind of manufacturing bottleneck unresolved as of Monday this week.

Some manufacturers are getting around this by offering Penryn-based machines as custom builds, hoping that the 2-3 week build time will buy enough time to ensure that they capture new sales from other vendors. In other words, they're making promises they might not be able to keep.

I think the situation will become clearer next week when we find out what shipped over the last 7 days. Once Penryn processors do become widely available expect a marketing blitz, because the Industry needs people to start buying PCs again. Potential Q1 sales data is looking grim.

In the meantime, Apple will not launch revised MBP until there is certainty of Penryn supply. If Intel gets its act together, then Apple's February event should be MacWorld Part 2.

Apple knows it needs a revised MBP now, so won't delay any longer than it has to. Whatever happens, Apple will not wait until May (when Montevina arrives) to launch a new MBP - because Intel may be late again.
post #37 of 100
These Intel Penryn production issues kind of put my suggestion that Apple buy AMD under a fresh light, no?

Flame-Suit On!

-Switchy McSwitcher
post #38 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tailpipe View Post

In the meantime, Apple will not launch revised MBP until there is certainty of Penryn supply.

That seems likely, they won't want to have customers ordering and then waiting for delivery and in the mean time, they can make more money off their older hardware by not reducing prices.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tailpipe View Post

If Intel gets its act together, then Apple's February event should be MacWorld Part 2.

I have a feeling that will be an iphone event for the SDK.
post #39 of 100
whats so great about penryn that it gets everyone buying PCs again?
post #40 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrklaw View Post

whats so great about penryn that it gets everyone buying PCs again?

Faster at equivalent chip speeds, cooler, more power efficient.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Future Apple Hardware
AppleInsider › Forums › Mac Hardware › Future Apple Hardware › Why the all new MacBook Pro has been delayed