Originally Posted by ShawnJ
Just a thought, but maybe you'd be fairer to people if you stopped placing them in made-up categories. My comments are "editorial," whatever that means. Addabox's comments are "spittle-inflected rants." These are just lame excuses for avoiding dealing with arguments.
Adda does go into a rant around the middle of most of his posts. When the BushHate™ gets too thick I just ignore it and address his points. How exactly does one argue with "those neo-con cocksucking nazi's who want..... etc."
As for you.... let's look at your own posts...
The Jungle was excellent!
However, the ending was a letdown. I was looking for a bit more than "socialism will save man kind."
This is tax discussion....
Those are weasel words.
This is why we ignore my point about Obama... because my words are weaselly...
That's a fantastic line!
Chiming in and piling on...
No, I think *some* thread discipline should be adhered to.
If there's an already existing topic you can post under, posters should make some effort to post there instead of creating a new...
Actual direct bits of this nonsense...
I think you're the only one who "realizes" that.
Wow that sure addresses the argument...
It's not about being "talked over."
It's about your odd desire to make a new thread out of every stray political thought that enters your brain. It's one thing to post new threads about different...
More of the same....
Yeah, what a "mistake."
This is about 10% of your current posting, reposting the sentence with a word in quotation marks implying sarcasm for someone stupid enough to use that word....
I could go on... but really what is the point. You've done it for years now. You get even more pissed off when I reflect your own language back at you so you see how ridiculous it happens to be. (insanely retarded memes anyone?)
You've become like a quasi giant. His posts are all just nonsense about how you you too uninformed or inexperienced or whatever to even have an opinion and thus he must be right in a vacuum.(Because being a librarian makes you an expert at everything)
You just pick it apart differently but still never assert anything. The words are weaselly. The point being made is just "insanely retarded." The point was already made, made too often, to closely resembles another point being made, came from the wrong source, uses the same words too often, clearly reflects a talking point due to similar phrasing, etc.
Heaven forbid we actually... you know address or discuss the point.