It says nothing, because that's not what happened. There was virtually no coverage of what was a very brief, blog derived speculation, beyond some commentary on how vile and scurrilous some blogs are.
Maybe I can dredge up some blogs that raved about how having a nigger in the White House would be the end of America, and claim that that set the standard for the coverage of Obama. Would that be OK with you?
What press coverage took that tone? Cite some, please.
If you mean the bad liberal media had the temerity to talk about an ongoing abuse of power investigation in her home state, yes, there was and is that coverage. Are you saying they should have ignored it? And which press coverage made of her a "dragon lady"? Citations, please.
Default? For what? People from Alaska? Women? Republicans? Vice-presidential candidates?
Her answers to questions in interviews are gibberish. It's a fact. They're not editing words together to make new sentences, we've all seen her answers at length. Are you saying that the liberal media is editing out the parts where she says "Just kidding, that's my hilarious brain-damaged person imitation"?
Just because a conservative comes off badly in the press doesn't make that an artifact of the liberal media. Some conservatives have actual liabilities. Your ideology is not served by pretending otherwise. Pretending otherwise means that all kinds of poorly prepared, ignorant, malign or fraudulent types can claim to be carrying the conservative banner, and if they come off that way it actually increases their popularity with conservatives, because it "proves" the liberal press is out to get them. Do that for a while, and you have a political ideology choked off by being represented by the least worthy. Oh wait, I guess that's already happened.
I guess by now you might have figured out that's not true, and is just another fucked-up right wing fabrication. A fucked-up right wing fabrication, I might add, designed to move attention from the fact that the McCain campaign is currently running Alaska-- much to the growing fury of its citizens.
You mean the registered independents among whom support for Palin is collapsing? Apparently there is at least one other way to argue it.
Guys, for your part, this doesn't have the ingredients for a meaningful discussion. Take a look at her past, and tell me she's has the accomplishments of an idiot. (?)
She has the accomplishments of a politician who has done well within her limited purview. She's an attractive woman with a down-home manner, and, it would appear, something of a ruthless streak. I'm sure she's a hard worker and I'm sure, to the people of Alaska, she seemed likable and easy to relate to. She had the advantage of being able to run as a "reformer" against a deeply corrupt and disliked incumbent.
None of that has anything to do with her apparent ignorance of the larger world and her inability to even fake it.