or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › Software › Mac Software › Mac virtualization software sales booming
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Mac virtualization software sales booming - Page 2

post #41 of 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by backtomac View Post

Don't know. I use XP.

I was referring to the use of the far less expressive OEM pack which could have been XP or Vista. It didn't work at first, the DVD was unreadable by a Mac or VMWare for some reason. Then I upgraded my VMWare to v 2 and low and behold it installed flawlessly. It also activated on line and verified fine. The OEM Business Vista was only $139! I can recommend these OEM versions to any Mac user at this price. I think the Business version (or higher) is the one MS license to be able to run under a VM too (they have altered position several times I seem to remember).
From Apple ][ - to new Mac Pro I've used them all.
Long on AAPL so biased
"Google doesn't sell you anything, they just sell you!"
Reply
From Apple ][ - to new Mac Pro I've used them all.
Long on AAPL so biased
"Google doesn't sell you anything, they just sell you!"
Reply
post #42 of 48
What I'm more interested in is Crossover. This kind of technology is something that in my opinion has the MOST potential. The ability to run Windows Programs on the Mac without Windows is the way to go. I know it may not be perfect yet, but this idea makes the most sense. Why waste time and money installing windows when you don't have too?
post #43 of 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by webraider View Post

What I'm more interested in is Crossover. This kind of technology is something that in my opinion has the MOST potential. The ability to run Windows Programs on the Mac without Windows is the way to go. I know it may not be perfect yet, but this idea makes the most sense. Why waste time and money installing windows when you don't have too?

Becuase for a lot of users, it's not just about running the programs, it's about testing stuff inside the entire OS.
post #44 of 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorre View Post

Becuase for a lot of users, it's not just about running the programs, it's about testing stuff inside the entire OS.

There are also a lot of issues with it with the tech that make it less than ideal for Apple to want develop and support. Robert X. Cringely has been one of the greatest proponents of Red Box, but there are just too many issues with it. Even now with Crossover, they have issues with some basic apps. I have IE6 installed in a Win98 bottle with CrossOver for the occasional testing and even that has some quirks after all this time.
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
post #45 of 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by webraider View Post

What I'm more interested in is Crossover. This kind of technology is something that in my opinion has the MOST potential. The ability to run Windows Programs on the Mac without Windows is the way to go. I know it may not be perfect yet, but this idea makes the most sense. Why waste time and money installing windows when you don't have too?

If they ever got the very latest version of IE and Microsoft Mail it would be very useful, as it is they seem to only support old versions (last time I tried it). However, we have to use these for work related issues and use VMWare with Vista Business and I have MobileMe Control Panel added to Vista so iPhone and Macs all sync with MS Mail, Calendars and Contacts (works perfectly by the way). I am dubious this could be done in Crossover as there would be no Control Panel would there? Correct me if this is an incorrect assumption.
From Apple ][ - to new Mac Pro I've used them all.
Long on AAPL so biased
"Google doesn't sell you anything, they just sell you!"
Reply
From Apple ][ - to new Mac Pro I've used them all.
Long on AAPL so biased
"Google doesn't sell you anything, they just sell you!"
Reply
post #46 of 48
Most IT departments don't want to support Macs because, frankly they don't want to support anything that is non-standard. It takes more effort and time to do so, and time is a precious commodity in most shops. Most IT people I know are indifferent to Macs, they don't hate them, they just don't have the time to understand them.

I use VMWare fusion because most of my work is done doing system administration on Window boxes, it's easier to use the VPN solution through Windows and then use the Windows RDP tool on the servers I'm dealing with. There are linux RDP solutions but it's just easier for me to use the built in tools.
post #47 of 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by edmonal View Post

I use VMWare fusion because most of my work is done doing system administration on Window boxes, it's easier to use the VPN solution through Windows and then use the Windows RDP tool on the servers I'm dealing with. There are linux RDP solutions but it's just easier for me to use the built in tools.

What's wrong with using VPN in OS X and the OS X RDP client? Works very well for me.
it's = it is / it has, its = belonging to it.
Reply
it's = it is / it has, its = belonging to it.
Reply
post #48 of 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. H View Post

What's wrong with using VPN in OS X and the OS X RDP client? Works very well for me.

Did not know about that, thank you. I'll go bug the Network guy to give me the specifics on setting up the Cisco VPN client for Mac.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Mac Software
AppleInsider › Forums › Software › Mac Software › Mac virtualization software sales booming