AppleInsider › Forums › Software › Mac OS X › Final build number?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Final build number?

post #1 of 15
8/11/02 at 9:27pm
Thread Starter 
Does anyone know what the final build number is for Mac OS X 10.2?
MacBook Pro C2D 2.16GHz, 15" Matte, 2GB RAM, 120GB HD, iPod nano 2GB Black.
Reply
MacBook Pro C2D 2.16GHz, 15" Matte, 2GB RAM, 120GB HD, iPod nano 2GB Black.
Reply
post #2 of 15
8/11/02 at 9:43pm
6C115, according to ThinkSecret.
Reply
Reply
post #3 of 15
8/11/02 at 10:35pm
Yes 6c115 is the gm BUT the retail one has a fue minor bugs fixed then the one that was put on the adc server weeks back <img src="graemlins/smokin.gif" border="0" alt="[Chilling]" />
A Apple a day keeps the pc's at bay
Reply
A Apple a day keeps the pc's at bay
Reply
post #4 of 15
8/12/02 at 4:35am
It's amusing when people post this nonsense. The same build, 6c115, that was sent to developers, is the same one that is being copied and boxed for retail.

There are a few known bugs in this version which will be fixed in an update that will probably appear early in September. There _cannot_ be other builds, simply because the focus at the moment is bugs in 6c115. Apple can hardly release one version, work on bug-fixing it, while another version is being copied and boxed which may have other bugs caused by changes, can they?

Currawong
Reply
Reply
post #5 of 15
8/12/02 at 5:04am
[quote]Originally posted by jaydog:
<strong>Yes 6c115 is the gm BUT the retail one has a fue minor bugs fixed then the one that was put on the adc server weeks back <img src="graemlins/smokin.gif" border="0" alt="[Chilling]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>

Apple will not have two versions of the same build. That would defeat the purpose of a build number.
Reply
Reply
post #6 of 15
8/12/02 at 5:20am
  • Escher
  • Sub-PowerBook Lobbyist
I thought they always removed the debug code after declaring a particular build golden master.

or should it be <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> ?

Escher
"The only laptop computer that's useful is the one you have with you."
Until we get a 3 lbs sub-PowerBook, the 12-inch PowerBook will do.
Reply
"The only laptop computer that's useful is the one you have with you."
Until we get a 3 lbs sub-PowerBook, the 12-inch PowerBook will do.
Reply
post #7 of 15
8/12/02 at 6:41am
Development on OS X doees not stop. There are more builds inside of Apple which incorporates bug fixes to this current OS branch and Apple's engineers continue to work on it. Just because something is declared GM doesn't mean all the developers pack up and go home.
Reply
Reply
post #8 of 15
8/12/02 at 7:00am
I dunno... I would have thought the final build number would be 10.2. <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> Or maybe X.x (aka "big X little X"). Just a thought.
I never get tired of being right all the time... but I do get tired of having to prove it to you again and again.
Reply
I never get tired of being right all the time... but I do get tired of having to prove it to you again and again.
Reply
post #9 of 15
8/12/02 at 8:05am
Escher you are totaly right one of the changes done was remove the debug stuff. Atleast some one eals here knows what they are talking about.
A Apple a day keeps the pc's at bay
Reply
A Apple a day keeps the pc's at bay
Reply
post #10 of 15
8/12/02 at 9:27pm
[quote]Originally posted by jaydog:
<strong>Escher you are totaly right one of the changes done was remove the debug stuff. Atleast some one eals here knows what they are talking about.</strong><hr></blockquote>

If they change anything then it becomes a different build.

This nonsense is truly quite amazing. What developers received (6c115) = what has been boxed.

[ 08-13-2002: Message edited by: Currawong ]</p>
Reply
Reply
post #11 of 15
8/12/02 at 10:59pm
I've got my hands on the actual FINAL Jaguar, Installed it, and it does look pretty much the same as the 6C115 posted on ADC site. THe real, Boxed version came with 2 install cd's and another grey one(i though it was an update cd) developer tools cd. not much difference.
Reply
Reply
post #12 of 15
8/12/02 at 11:01pm
Oh yeah... it is 6C115 by the way... Lol!
Reply
Reply
post #13 of 15
8/12/02 at 11:57pm
[quote]Originally posted by milanjazz:
<strong>Oh yeah... it is 6C115 by the way... Lol! </strong><hr></blockquote>

It's actually build 6c115xzyeitzeketnbatyaebd, Steve Jobs has supernatural powers allowing him to modify the CD's after they've been made and sent to customers
Reply
Reply
post #14 of 15
8/13/02 at 4:47pm
This is minor, but in 6C115, Apple has removed the Aqua Icons screen saver...I liked that screen saver...oh well. <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[No]" />
Reply
Reply
post #15 of 15
8/13/02 at 7:34pm
[quote]Originally posted by jaydog:
<strong>Escher you are totaly right one of the changes done was remove the debug stuff. Atleast some one eals here knows what they are talking about.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Uh, you complete f*cking idiot: there are NO changes between the ADC 6C115 and the retail 6C115. The ONLY builds that ever have anything remotely what some people like to call "debug code" are called checked builds, and aren't even built for CD...they can only be installed via NetInstall on internally at Apple.

NO SEEDED VERSION OF ANY VERSION OF MAC OS X HAS EVER HAD "DEBUG CODE" IN IT.

There is ONE 6C115, and ONE only. And what everyone is using right now is IDENTICAL to what you get on the 24th.
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Mac OS X
AppleInsider › Forums › Software › Mac OS X › Final build number?