New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Gitmo

post #1 of 29
Thread Starter 
OK, this is a can of worms, but here it is.

Obama and his team plan to close Gitmo and called for a 120-day suspension of "trials" while cases are considered. A Bush-era judge came out and said at least one detainee was tortured, thus truly complicating any further legal proceedings. How should it be closed?

There are a wide variety of opinions on this one, but let's try to have a reasonable discussion.

Some background reading (there will likely be many, many more linkies posted by others below, but here is a start):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantan...detention_camp

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_conventions
Nota bene the Third Geneva Convention

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Univers...f_Human_Rights

http://www.newsweek.com/id/168022

http://www.reuters.com/article/lates.../idUSN21485084

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/was...investigations

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp...mkAB5MjD9HiQig

 

Your = the possessive of you, as in, "Your name is Tom, right?" or "What is your name?"

 

You're = a contraction of YOU + ARE as in, "You are right" --> "You're right."

 

 

Reply

 

Your = the possessive of you, as in, "Your name is Tom, right?" or "What is your name?"

 

You're = a contraction of YOU + ARE as in, "You are right" --> "You're right."

 

 

Reply
post #2 of 29
Quote:
The military trial of an inmate held at Guantanamo Bay has been suspended after a request by US President Barack Obama.

a request by US President Barack Obama.

US President Barack Obama.

I have to admit that phrase is a surprising relief to see, after the last 8 years.

Hope the feeling lasts a while...but...

Government policies, especially ones that have a lot of thought put into them, have political inertia. You can't just sign something and expect the logistical, legal, and social framework associated with it to change that second.

This is why I think that Obama has to dismantle Gitmo piece by piece instead of just declaring it closed.
post #3 of 29
Thread Starter 

 

Your = the possessive of you, as in, "Your name is Tom, right?" or "What is your name?"

 

You're = a contraction of YOU + ARE as in, "You are right" --> "You're right."

 

 

Reply

 

Your = the possessive of you, as in, "Your name is Tom, right?" or "What is your name?"

 

You're = a contraction of YOU + ARE as in, "You are right" --> "You're right."

 

 

Reply
post #4 of 29
Thread Starter 
It's official: Obama signs order for Gitmo to close within the year, other orders regarding procedures.

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS...der/index.html

So, how to close it?

 

Your = the possessive of you, as in, "Your name is Tom, right?" or "What is your name?"

 

You're = a contraction of YOU + ARE as in, "You are right" --> "You're right."

 

 

Reply

 

Your = the possessive of you, as in, "Your name is Tom, right?" or "What is your name?"

 

You're = a contraction of YOU + ARE as in, "You are right" --> "You're right."

 

 

Reply
post #5 of 29
well gee....none of these had the Miranda read to them....so they will go free....return to their terroist ways....
I APPLE THEREFORE I AM
Reply
I APPLE THEREFORE I AM
Reply
post #6 of 29
On the 1st Day, the Lord said, Let there be Change, and there was change, and we were well pleased.

Of course, if it has been ruled that Guantanamo is an illegal holding centre, and as torture has now formally been removed from the book, then it is pretty clear, that criminals and torturers need to be bought to account.

On the second day, the lord said, let their be a war-crime tribunal.....
post #7 of 29
so the "lords" reign will be only 7 days, 6 with a rest....wonderful
I APPLE THEREFORE I AM
Reply
I APPLE THEREFORE I AM
Reply
post #8 of 29
...on the 2922nd day of our Lords dominion, he said, "Let Hilary win the election". and Hilary won the election, and the Lord was well pleased.
post #9 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bergermeister View Post

It's official: Obama signs order for Gitmo to close within the year, other orders regarding procedures.

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS...der/index.html

So, how to close it?

Ask any Palestinian householder, farmer, or market gardener, olive plantation owner, you name it. D9 bulldozers (as used by the Israelis) would raze Gitmo very effectively, in a few hours.

The POWs? If charges can be brought, try them federal court, in fair, open trials. What is wrong with that?

If they cannot charge them with anything (ie the overwhelming majority of Gitmo inmates)... then this implies lack of guilt. It does not require a stretch of the imagination that most of these people are simply there because they are from Afghanistan who were in the "wrong place at the wrong time", and the Bush administration preferred to keep these guys arbitrarily locked up in legal limbo, rather than lose face.

However... imagine something. It's November, 2001. You are a goat herder's son in Afghanistan. Suddenly a bunch of heavily armed men in uniform burst into your house, automatic weapons blazing. You dive for cover. Your father gets bludgeoned to death, your sister and mother get raped before being shot. You're hiding behind some furniture, listening to everything. Finally you get found. You get beaten up and blindfolded, dragged onto a helicopter and flown somewhere. You get thrown into a cell with only rats for company. Guards occasionally walk by and kick you in the testicles and piss all over you. Then a few days later, barely able to stand, starving and weak, you get marched onto a plane, still blindfolded and in leg irons and handcuffs. When you finally see the light of day, some 24 hours later, you're in an outdoor cell open to the elements, surrounded by razor wire. The sun is blazing, there's no shade and the humidity is 90%. You don't speak English. Nobody explains why you're there, or where you are. You don't have access to a lawyer. They feed you unfamiliar food that upsets your digestion. On regular occasions you get hauled into a room where guards bark questions about subjects you know nothing about. If you don't answer to the satisfaction of the guards, they pour water down your throat. You make stuff up to stop the terror. This goes on for 7 and a half years, until finally, one day in spring of 2009, you're told that you're being freed, and you are to be flown back home to Afghanistan.

That person would have to be the world's most forgiving man not to spend a good part of the rest of his life plotting ways of getting back at his tormentors. And without a legal way of doing such, the only avenue left open would be via the bomb and bullet.

Perhaps these people should not be freed?
"We've never made the case, or argued the case that somehow Osama bin Laden was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming". VP Cheney, 3/29/2006. Interview by Tony Snow
Reply
"We've never made the case, or argued the case that somehow Osama bin Laden was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming". VP Cheney, 3/29/2006. Interview by Tony Snow
Reply
post #10 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by sammi jo View Post


Perhaps these people should not be freed?

Is this for real?

You would keep innocent people locked up indefinately, because they might be a little bit more than seriously pissed off when they get released.

Perhaps the dark side finally takes hold of you?
post #11 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by nordkapp View Post

Is this for real?

You would keep innocent people locked up indefinately, because they might be a little bit more than seriously pissed off when they get released.

Perhaps the dark side finally takes hold of you?

I was trying to preempt what many might be thinking. I don't know what to do. Each case has to be evaluated on its individual merits.

It goes way further than just Gitmo. Because of Iraq, Afghanistan, Gitmo and the so-called "war on terror" in general, we have undoubtedly made things far worse regarding motivation for possible future revenge attacks. Similarly with our blanket support for the Israelis, who can do whatever they want, regardless of international law, knowing they won;t have to answer for it. There are millions of people in the mid east who have lost family members and friends, murdered as a result of foreigners invading and trashing their land in just the last 8 years, for reasons that have no basis in truth and reality. How many will turn to revenge, rather than "forgive and forget" is an unknown. It only takes a few (or, failing that, a false flag op) and we can kiss our freedoms goodbye.

The problem will never be resolved because the folk who started this crap are incapable of apologizing and offering reparations. The victims will not have access to the courts to go the legal route.

In other words, a heckofamess.
"We've never made the case, or argued the case that somehow Osama bin Laden was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming". VP Cheney, 3/29/2006. Interview by Tony Snow
Reply
"We've never made the case, or argued the case that somehow Osama bin Laden was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming". VP Cheney, 3/29/2006. Interview by Tony Snow
Reply
post #12 of 29
Pentagon: Ex-Gitmo detainees resume terror acts

Quote:
Dozens of suspected terrorists released by the United States from Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, are believed to have returned to terrorism activities, according to the Pentagon.

Since 2002, 61 former detainees have committed or are suspected to have committed attacks after being released from the detention camp, Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said at a briefing Tuesday.

The number is up since the Pentagon's last report in March 2008 when officials said 37 former detainees had been suspected of returning to the battlefield since 2002.

Since 2007, more than 100 detainees were released, significantly more than in previous years, according to Pentagon officials.

According to the statistics, of the 61 former detainees that are believed to have returned to fighting, 18 have been officially confirmed while 43 are suspected, Morrell said.

The 18 were confirmed through intelligence, photographs, fingerprints and other information, Morrell said.

Of the 43 other detainees suspected of taking part in terrorist attacks, only "plausible reporting" on their activities indicated some kind of involvement, according to Morrell.

Officials would only identify one of the confirmed attackers, Adballah Salih al-Ajmi, a Kuwaiti man released from U.S. custody at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in 2005. Pentagon officials said Salih al-Ajmi blew himself up in a suicide attack in Iraq in April 2008.

Since 2002, the Pentagon has released about 520 detainees to their home countries or counties that agreed to take them. Some have been released in full by those countries while others are still being held.

"There, clearly, are people who are being held at Guantanamo who are still bent on doing harm to America, Americans and our allies, so there will have to be some solution for the likes of them," Morrell said.

About 250 detainees remain held at Guantanamo and about 60 of those detainees have been cleared for release by the Pentagon, but their home countries will not take them or the U.S. believes they could be harmed by their governments if returned.

Guantanamo Bay detention facility has had a radicalizing effect among hardcore Muslims around the world and I wouldn't be surprised if many of those "returning to terrorism" suspects (of which are 43, only 18 confirmed) have been subjected to acts of torture by US officials.
post #13 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by sammi jo View Post

I was trying to preempt what many might be thinking. I don't know what to do. Each case has to be evaluated on its individual merits.

It goes way further than just Gitmo. Because of Iraq, Afghanistan, Gitmo and the so-called "war on terror" in general, we have undoubtedly made things far worse regarding motivation for possible future revenge attacks. Similarly with our blanket support for the Israelis, who can do whatever they want, regardless of international law, knowing they won;t have to answer for it. There are millions of people in the mid east who have lost family members and friends, murdered as a result of foreigners invading and trashing their land in just the last 8 years, for reasons that have no basis in truth and reality. How many will turn to revenge, rather than "forgive and forget" is an unknown. It only takes a few (or, failing that, a false flag op) and we can kiss our freedoms goodbye.

The problem will never be resolved because the folk who started this crap are incapable of apologizing and offering reparations. The victims will not have access to the courts to go the legal route.

In other words, a heckofamess.

we need to hear their story and be horrified by it, so that something like this can never happen again.

Just like we needed to know the horrors of the haulocast after ww2.
post #14 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by @_@ Artman View Post

Pentagon: Ex-Gitmo detainees resume terror acts



Guantanamo Bay detention facility has had a radicalizing effect among hardcore Muslims around the world and I wouldn't be surprised if many of those "returning to terrorism" suspects (of which are 43, only 18 confirmed) have been subjected to acts of torture by US officials.

I have no particular reason to believe anything the Pentagon says about detainees. They were the ones that threw a bunch of innocent people into detention in the first place, then lied for years about their status, when they weren't simply blacking out information altogether.

Any claims now about what former detainees "have done or are suspected to have done", (which is quite the handy all encompassing phrase, is it not?) should be taken with a grain of salt, if that.

I mean, what would you expect them to say? "Most if not all of the people that we held for years without charges, many of whom we tortured, have, upon release, returned to the quiet, utterly unremarkable lives they were leading before we illegally abducted them in a frenzy of xenophobic rage. We are, therefore, criminals and rightfully international pariahs, and probably deserve to be prosecuted for war crimes"?

The vague, unverifiable stuff the Pentagon is putting out is pure face saving propaganda, and they know that no one will ask to see the evidence. Which is what they've been doing for eight years, so it's not particularly surprising. Doesn't mean we have to give it any credence.
They spoke of the sayings and doings of their commander, the grand duke, and told stories of his kindness and irascibility.
Reply
They spoke of the sayings and doings of their commander, the grand duke, and told stories of his kindness and irascibility.
Reply
post #15 of 29
Yes, I agree that last statement is ironic to say the least...

Quote:
About 250 detainees remain held at Guantanamo and about 60 of those detainees have been cleared for release by the Pentagon, but their home countries will not take them or the U.S. believes they could be harmed by their governments if returned.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Also...


Quote:
Sources familiar with the briefings said Obama also will sign two executive orders altering CIA detention and interrogation rules, limiting interrogation standards in all U.S. facilities worldwide to those outlined in the Army Field Manual, and prohibiting the agency from secretly holding terrorist detainees in third-country prisons.

So renditions will have to be documented now. It certainly seems so what with the prohibition on using black sites along with an Attorney General who appears to actually care.

Or perhaps I am missing something, who knows...?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh dear, the Hanninites aren't to happy...
post #16 of 29
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by @_@ Artman View Post

Oh dear, the Hanninites aren't to happy...

That was a good laugh.

 

Your = the possessive of you, as in, "Your name is Tom, right?" or "What is your name?"

 

You're = a contraction of YOU + ARE as in, "You are right" --> "You're right."

 

 

Reply

 

Your = the possessive of you, as in, "Your name is Tom, right?" or "What is your name?"

 

You're = a contraction of YOU + ARE as in, "You are right" --> "You're right."

 

 

Reply
post #17 of 29
Maybe KSM will get released into the US on a technicality by the 9th circuit and move into a foreclosed home and go back to sawing the heads off of jews.
post #18 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by FloorJack View Post

Maybe KSM will get released into the US on a technicality by the 9th circuit and move into a foreclosed home and go back to sawing the heads off of jews.

and make bombs in his new home using TARP subsidized mortgage...because he can't find gainfull employment and lives the life of "victimhood" at our mounting dept expense.

bail will be set at -100k, that's right our government will pay HIM to go to court.
he's not a flight risk....he has it too easy.
I APPLE THEREFORE I AM
Reply
I APPLE THEREFORE I AM
Reply
post #19 of 29
Two THOUSAND Nine HUNDRED and NINETEEN days of COMPLETE IRRELAVENCE left to go.
post #20 of 29
How many days nordkapp stays on my ignore? It will remain up to whether he provides anything worth replying too I guess.
post #21 of 29
Thread Starter 
Go figure.

Obama's team is going to have to spend lots of time cleaning up the paperwork mess before they can properly deal with Gitmo.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...=moreheadlines

 

Your = the possessive of you, as in, "Your name is Tom, right?" or "What is your name?"

 

You're = a contraction of YOU + ARE as in, "You are right" --> "You're right."

 

 

Reply

 

Your = the possessive of you, as in, "Your name is Tom, right?" or "What is your name?"

 

You're = a contraction of YOU + ARE as in, "You are right" --> "You're right."

 

 

Reply
post #22 of 29
He's making a show for the cameras. Bush wanted to close Gitmo and deal with people there. His admin' reviewed interrogation and Obama may come up with standards that are similar. Water boarding was used on only three people and was discontinued years ago. Nothing to see here folks ... move along.

But the cameras love it and it fits the Change slogan and gives terrorist Hope that my may get back to killing Jews and Americans some day.
post #23 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by FloorJack View Post

He's making a show for the cameras. Bush wanted to close Gitmo and deal with people there. His admin' reviewed interrogation and Obama may come up with standards that are similar. Water boarding was used on only three people and was discontinued years ago. Nothing to see here folks ... move along.

But the cameras love it and it fits the Change slogan and gives terrorist Hope that my may get back to killing Jews and Americans some day.

maybe that's the terroist "hope" portion of his slogan
I APPLE THEREFORE I AM
Reply
I APPLE THEREFORE I AM
Reply
post #24 of 29
Wait, so Bush wanted to close Gitmo and end torture and now Obama's just following through on what Bush was going to do anyway, but when Obama does it it will give hope to terrorists?

Maybe Bush knew his version wouldn't give hope to terrorists because it was going to happen in the his alternative universe third term?

This is very confusing.
They spoke of the sayings and doings of their commander, the grand duke, and told stories of his kindness and irascibility.
Reply
They spoke of the sayings and doings of their commander, the grand duke, and told stories of his kindness and irascibility.
Reply
post #25 of 29
Anyone up for betting that the information did exist before Dick Cheney pulled a back muscle shredding all relevant documents?
post #26 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by @_@ Artman View Post

US President Barack Obama.

I have to admit that phrase is a surprising relief to see, after the last 8 years.

Hope the feeling lasts a while...but...

Government policies, especially ones that have a lot of thought put into them, have political inertia. You can't just sign something and expect the logistical, legal, and social framework associated with it to change that second.

This is why I think that Obama has to dismantle Gitmo piece by piece instead of just declaring it closed.

Tell me about. I see unicorns dancing on rainbows now. I'm all giddy about a black person for President, even though he has less political experience than Sarah Palin.

And about Gitmo... if you bleeding hearts love these guys so much, house them in your house after Gitmo is closed. Listen up you fucking retard liberal Americans:

THESE PIECES OF SHIT CAMEL FUCKING CAVE DWELLING RAG HEAD FUCKS HATE YOU AND WOULD RATHER KILL YOU THAN LOOK AT YOU.
Follow me on Twitter.
Reply
Follow me on Twitter.
Reply
post #27 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by His Dudeness View Post

Tell me about. I see unicorns dancing on rainbows now. I'm all giddy about a black person for President, even though he has less political experience than Sarah Palin.

And about Gitmo... if you bleeding hearts love these guys so much, house them in your house after Gitmo is closed. Listen up you fucking retard liberal Americans:

THESE PIECES OF SHIT CAMEL FUCKING CAVE DWELLING RAG HEAD FUCKS HATE YOU AND WOULD RATHER KILL YOU THAN LOOK AT YOU.

Which is no doubt why the Bush admin released the vast majority of Gimo detainees after holding them without charges for years on end and never bringing them to trial.

Because they love them some terrorists.
They spoke of the sayings and doings of their commander, the grand duke, and told stories of his kindness and irascibility.
Reply
They spoke of the sayings and doings of their commander, the grand duke, and told stories of his kindness and irascibility.
Reply
post #28 of 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by addabox View Post

Wait, so Bush wanted to close Gitmo and end torture and now Obama's just following through on what Bush was going to do anyway, but when Obama does it it will give hope to terrorists?

Maybe Bush knew his version wouldn't give hope to terrorists because it was going to happen in the his alternative universe third term?

This is very confusing.

It can be confusing when same is marketed as Change. What is Obama against these days? The military commission that Congress passed into law (is Obama disreguarding federal law)? The slow process of justice that Obama made even slower this week? Keeping Gitmo open which everyone wanted closed anyway?

We don't have crystal balls. I would imagine that Bush would have emptied Gitmo via the millitary courts that were setup whereas Teh Hope and Teh Change will move these people to the US and give them more legal standing so we can tie the civil court up in knots OJ style.

I hope when KSM get out of jail and no country will agree not to off his ass he'll move into a nice liberal part of the country and go right back to the peaceful activities he was doing before he was "radicalized" by Gitmo.
post #29 of 29
July 4, 2009.
"We've never made the case, or argued the case that somehow Osama bin Laden was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming". VP Cheney, 3/29/2006. Interview by Tony Snow
Reply
"We've never made the case, or argued the case that somehow Osama bin Laden was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming". VP Cheney, 3/29/2006. Interview by Tony Snow
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: PoliticalOutsider