
Wrong, Wrong, Wrong, Wrong, WRONG.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...pflooding.html
http://www.fema.gov/news/newsrelease.fema?id=47798
http://www.minnpost.com/stories/2009...fargo_notebook
http://www.wtopnews.com/?nid=104&sid=1559881
Just for kicks, why don't you look up the levy spending in the New Orleans area in the last 10 years, and factor in the populations of Greater New Orleans and Greater Fargo (hint - they differ by an order of magnitude), and then tell us what Federal flood control per capita spending was for each one?
Last, but not least - can you just stop for a minute and imagine what the "why do they live in a floodplain, anyway?" comments about New Orleans would have been like if it had seen similar flooding just 12 years ago?
Both of your posts on this subject provide ample proof that your assumptions about federal involvement in Fargo are.... ummm.... somewhat inaccurate.
You are MISSING MY POINT ENTIRELY.

I'm not talking about what the government did or did't do in each situation. Re-read my posts. I am talking about the attitudes of the residents.
Also keep in mind, the present situation with Fargo is happening post-Katrina. Apparently we've learned from Katrina.
Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
(I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude.)
Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
(I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quiet of servitude.)










