AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Notes of interest from Apple's Q209 quarterly conference call
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Notes of interest from Apple's Q209 quarterly conference call - Page 2

post #41 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrparet View Post

I'm floored that the CFO said that consumers aren't interested in netbooks. That market segment is booming.

Netbooks are recession-candy.

Once the economic climate improves, watch netbook sales tank.

Apple doesn't need to be a part of the cheap junk. Consumers are also interested in Dells, HPs, etc.

If Apple does make a netbook-style device, the differentiator will be great software running in a small package - meaning, dynamic portability. Not price.
post #42 of 98
".... we think that competition is great... as long as other companies invent their own stuff."

I'm really beginning to like this guy!
post #43 of 98
Offer SLI and even triple SLI on the Mac Pro and you'll see sales noticeably improve.

Without that the CAD/CAM/FEA industry will use Linux before OS X.
post #44 of 98
From my experience you at least need a 12 inch display to correctly view a webpage.

A webpage that has been formatted for mobile phones, you don't have to do any zooming on the iPhone. Pretty much all of the most popular websites have mobile formatted sites too. Also websites arraigned in a column format are easy to navigate on the iPhone without the need for a lot of pinch/zoom. The problem is not as big as you make it sound.

Quote:
Originally Posted by UltimateKylie View Post

There is a HUGE difference between a 9" display that lets you view most websites and a iPod Touch/iPhone where you must constantly zoom in and out to gather anything. In addition to the fact that you have netbooks with 80+ GB HDD. While I appreciate the usual fud from Apple corporate, its nothing but coverups until they release a netbook. They will... just watch... the ending shows it all... I can see it now "netbooks done right" by Apple.
post #45 of 98
Here's what Tim Cook had to say about netbbooks:

For us, its about doing great products. And when I look at what is being sold in the netbook space today, I see cramped keyboards, terrible software, junky hardware, very small screens, and just not a consumer experience that we would put the Mac brand on, quite frankly. And so its not a space, as it exists today, that were interested in, nor do we believe that customers in the long term would be interested in.

Tim Cook to netbooks: "Drop dead."

Make of that what you will, but whatever ever Apple tends to openly denigrate, ends up losing its desirability. It gets Wal-Mart'ed.

It's an absolutely brilliant way of saying you're the superior brand, the superior option. It's ballsy in the extreme. No one else does that. And no on else is enjoying the success that Apple is, either.

Apple will release a device to "compete" with these netbooks in the Premium category. But it won't look like a netbook. Other companies will try to follow suit - that is, duplicate the features and desirability of this new product/paradigm at lower cost (what they usually try to do.) Netbooks will be supplanted and die a slow death.

So get one of these budget-bangers while you can, because they won't last.
post #46 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadra 610 View Post

Make of that what you will, but whatever ever Apple tends to openly denigrate, ends up losing its desirability. It gets Wal-Mart'ed.

iPods and IPhones are sold at Wal-Mart.
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
post #47 of 98
Net book?
After spending too much time on the ipod touch, I am ready for a larger version that I can see better, type on easier, with better reception, that I can run the game apps on, surf on, get on my time machine disk for reading and editing documents, and view a movie on, or listen to music.

I want a handpad I can read a newspaper on, read a book on, and answer my emails on. I don't expect a two handed touch typing system. It would be nice if I could skype on it too. I want to use Ical, safari, and Itunes. If you want to toss in a gps feature, OK, but that's too much like the phone. The compass and accelerometers would expand the game market, as long as they could talk to one another.

I don't want a phone ( G3 or G4 voice thang) . I don't want to take real pictures with it. I don't want to write a novel on it. I want a heavy duty touch, with a great screen, that I can network into my other Imacs, and use them for a remote drive. If you want a USB port, thats OK too, but not a deal breaker.

Decent battery life would be nice, and a decent amount of on board memory.

I am getting an Air, but I want something I don't have to read on my lap in bed. I figure that is what SJ is monkeying with at home right now. That, or driving the wife and kids crazy. It's half the reason I think he took off, to get better and get this project done.

Oh, and I want a baby blue unicorn and talks and poops rainbows.
post #48 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by solipsism View Post

He has a point. These netbooks are small and cramped, but they run software optimized for larger displays on normal PCs. I have an MSI Wind with Mac OS X installed, it's okay, but it is in no way a PC replacement. Regardless of the processing power, the small screen and keyboard make it less than ideal for everyday use. The iPhone is not a PC replacement, it's a cellphone and iPod with some functions of a PC done in a completely different way. It's meant to supplement your PC, not replace it.

Netbook sales are growing but they are not overshadowing smartphone or notebook sales in any way. If you are going to have a portable device to supplement your PC an iPhone is much more portable and convenient while on the go. If you are going to use it as your only machine, I don't see why one wouldn't get a full-sized notebook for $400 fora 15" display, full sized keyboard and dual-core CPU, instead of $300 for something vastly slower and less capable.

To each their own, I see a place for netbooks, but I understand Apple's position here. And I can't really see them making one for less than $700-$800.

But a netbook makes more sense for browsing the web, taking notes, writing extended e-mails, etc, than an iPhone/Touch.

I just can't get that warmed up over spending more than a few minutes using mobile Safari on a 3.5" screen, or not being able to check or even write e-mail in landscape mode on my Touch, not to mention it lacks CPU speed, storage, and memory.

It could also be an issue with my Touch (OS 2.2), but it has a lag when trying to type messages in Safari, or it just gives up and crashes. The whole reason I got a netbook, is that I wanted something smaller than my laptop, but had more oomph than my Touch; the Touch a better browsing experience than my phone, but it's only good in a pinch.
post #49 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by guinness View Post

But a netbook makes more sense for browsing the web, taking notes, writing extended e-mails, etc, than an iPhone/Touch.

Absolutely, and a notebook makes more sense than a netbook. More importantly, the iPhone isn't trying to be a notebook, it's a handheld device with some internet capabilities.

The problem with all of today's netbooks and a lot of CE is they wedge themselves into an area they think is devoid and then try to fit the needs of everything above and below it. Netbooks are really the worst of everything. It's not a comfortable or usable notebook and it's not a portable handheld device. It's better to have a notebook and an iPhone/Touch than it would be to have a netbook, and there is no reason to have all three at once. They have Atom processors that can't even run "high quality" video on Hulu because Flash is too resource hungry. It's 480p and a low bitrate at that, but you have to use 360p if you want to prevent stuttering.
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
post #50 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by solipsism View Post

— Apple isn't refusing to give people a 12" 4:3 machine, it's the market that doesn't want it. I can't imagine you would have thought your response through so I'll explain it to you. As it stands now, the 13" MB display is shorter than the old 12" PB display. If you go to an 11" widescreen format you get yourself a display that is worthless for viewing pages of text on, whose only value is for video.

Why must you always challenge me? You always loose. The 13inch MacBook is 2 inches wider than the 12inch PowerBook. Put down your KoolAid and look it up -I dare you. You're laughable- you can't read text on an 11 " display? Right and that's why netbooks are designed primarily just for that and they go down to 5 inches.
By your reasoning your iPhone's screen is worthless but alas I'm positive you'll come up for a reason that it's better than an 11" screen to view because it's an Apple iPhone.
post #51 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by solipsism View Post

Absolutely, and a notebook makes more sense than a netbook. More importantly, the iPhone isn't trying to be a notebook, it's a handheld device with some internet capabilities.

The problem with all of today's netbooks and a lot of CE is they wedge themselves into an area they think is devoid and then try to fit the needs of everything above and below it. Netbooks are really the worst of everything. It's not a comfortable or usable notebook and it's not a portable handheld device. It's better to have a notebook and an iPhone/Touch than it would be to have a netbook, and there is no reason to have all three at once. They have Atom processors that can't even run "high quality" video on Hulu because Flash is too resource hungry. It's 480p and a low bitrate at that, but you have to use 360p if you want to prevent stuttering.

At least I'm glad you agree that a notebook makes more sense.
post #52 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by teckstud View Post

Why must you always challenge me? You always loose. The 13inch MacBook is 2 inches wider than the 12inch PowerBook. Put down your KoolAid and look it up -I dare you. You're laughable- you can't read text on an 11 " display? Right and that's why netbooks are designed primarily just for that and they go down to 5 inches.
By your reasoning your iPhone's screen is worthless but alas I'm positive you'll come up for a reason that it's better than an 11" screen to view because it's an Apple iPhone.

Lose? When have you ever come close to having a viable argument you could win. Case in point, I state that 4:3 ratio 12" PB was taller and the 13" 16:9 MB being shorter and you come back with a comment about the MB being considerably wider, which with a 16:9 ratio proves my point to a tee, but you think think proves your point in some bizarro Teckstudian logic. You need to check your meds and your math again. Back to the ignore list with you, Tecktroll.
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
post #53 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by paxman View Post

I am buying one, too. I am moving my alu iMac (beautiful machine) home and buying either a
  • MacBook with a 24" monitor. My fave choice at the moment - great portability with a great monitor for desk work.
  • A 17" mbp. I would choose the matte screeen. A little large and a little pricey but what a great machine!
  • A 15" mbp. All around work horse and I know I would be very happy. Also the best price

I am stuck trying to figure out which will be the most amazing thing to own and the most practical on a day to day basis. Gimme any and I'll be happy. Ouch!

Originally I was going to buy an iMac but for reasons I've mentioned before decided to stay with my white power horse,
So now I want a new laptop.I was in Apple yesterday & was talking to a sales rep telling her I kinda of like the MBA without the black border but was told for video editing (iMovie) not good- go for the MacBook. However the new MacBook has no firewire for my camera! Then I notice how the body show scratches very easy unlike the white one. And then there's the high glossed screens. There they all were bouncing lights off them and the Mac class is being taught with the old matte cinema display which all could view from every angle. I swear - whoever decided to go high glossy screen for the environment should be waterboarded- I'm talking to you Al Gore.
However the 17 inch matte MacBook Pro is unbelievable- amazing. NO ugly black border around the screen. And that screen is gorgeous. Why Apple why? I am stuck too.
post #54 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by teckstud View Post

Why must you always challenge me? You always loose. The 13inch MacBook is 2 inches wider than the 12inch PowerBook. Put down your KoolAid and look it up -I dare you. You're laughable- you can't read text on an 11 " display? Right and that's why netbooks are designed primarily just for that and they go down to 5 inches.
By your reasoning your iPhone's screen is worthless but alas I'm positive you'll come up for a reason that it's better than an 11" screen to view because it's an Apple iPhone.

Lose? When have you ever come close to having a viable argument you could win. Case in point, I state that 4:3 ration 12" PB was taller than the 13" 16:9 MB being shorter and you come back with a comment about the MB being wider, which with a 16:9 proves my point. You need to check your meds and your math again.
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
post #55 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by solipsism View Post

Lose? When have you ever come close to having a viable argument you could win. Case in point, I state that 4:3 ratio 12" PB was taller and the 13" 16:9 MB being shorter and you come back with a comment about the MB being considerably wider, which with a 16:9 ratio proves my point to a tee, but you think think proves your point in some bizarro Teckstudian logic. You need to check your meds and your math again. Back to the ignore list with you, Tecktroll.

Tecktroll? People want a small form factor- I don't care if it's 16:9-.4:3 -whatever. Small is in- that my point. You keep distorting it with screen ratios and everything you can conjure up in your kool-aid bag of tricks.
post #56 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by solipsism View Post

Troll much?

— 2% decline in worldwide unit sales year-over-year in a worldwide recession and you honestly write crap like "Macs aren't selling".

— If you think that no one likes gloss screens you need to up your dosage.

— Apple isn't refusing to give people a 12" 4:3 machine, it's the market that doesn't want it. I can't imagine you would have thought your response through so I'll explain it to you. As it stands now, the 13" MB display is shorter than the old 12" PB display. If you go to an 11" widescreen format you get yourself a display that is worthless for viewing pages of text on, whose only value is for video.

— You want price drops yet their profit is down 12% yet their sales only down 2% year-over-year. I'd say they already put in a price cut.

— Your previous comments that the Shuffle sucks is obviously false now that they stated " buyers responded well", or are you going to try to weasel yourself out of that comment, too.

Got Kool-aid?

- They are not selling as well- the figures and the writer of this article states that not me. Stop spinning lies and distortions.

- Never said no one likes glossy screen. But many of us don't - again you distort what I write.

- Apple had refused to give us a small formed factor laptop again and again. MBA is not small- it's thin. The 12 inch Powerbook was 2 inches less wide than any 13 inch current model MacBook and was wildly popular and missed by those that owned them. Fact not fiction. An 11inch 16:9 would be a small formed laptop. The 13 inch MacBook simply does not fill this niche nor does the MBA.

- I mention one price drop in the MacMini and you go ballistic stating I said price drops everywhere?

-The new shuffle does suck - what does "buyers responded well" mean? It's a brand new product- of course it's gonna sell to the trendoids and the uninformed. Why wouldn't it sell?

You're laughable with your constant distortions and misrepresentations of what I or any others say against the doctrine.
post #57 of 98
146 million notebooks were sold in 2008, while roughly 11 million netbooks were sold. Just to put their popularity in perspective.

Quote:
Originally Posted by teckstud View Post

Tecktroll? People want a small form factor- I don't care if it's 16:9-.4:3 -whatever. Small is in- that my point. You keep distorting it with screen ratios and everything you can conjure up in your kool-aid bag of tricks.
post #58 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by TenoBell View Post

146 million notebooks were sold in 2008, while roughly 11 million netbooks were sold. Just to put their popularity in perspective.


7% over very few years- not bad.
Kinda of like Mac's share of computer sales- like 8 % over like how many years?
your point? so? and?
post #59 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadra 610 View Post

Here's what Tim Cook had to say about netbbooks:

For us, its about doing great products. And when I look at what is being sold in the netbook space today, I see cramped keyboards, terrible software, junky hardware, very small screens, and just not a consumer experience that we would put the Mac brand on, quite frankly. And so its not a space, as it exists today, that were interested in, nor do we believe that customers in the long term would be interested in.

Tim Cook to netbooks: "Drop dead."

Make of that what you will, but whatever ever Apple tends to openly denigrate, ends up losing its desirability. It gets Wal-Mart'ed.

It's an absolutely brilliant way of saying you're the superior brand, the superior option. It's ballsy in the extreme. No one else does that. And no on else is enjoying the success that Apple is, either.

Apple will release a device to "compete" with these netbooks in the Premium category. But it won't look like a netbook. Other companies will try to follow suit - that is, duplicate the features and desirability of this new product/paradigm at lower cost (what they usually try to do.) Netbooks will be supplanted and die a slow death.

So get one of these budget-bangers while you can, because they won't last.

I don't think so...

If Apple comes up with pricey competitor to netbooks, it will do as well as other Apple computers do in their respective markets... taking, on average, less than 10% of that market. No matter how cool Apple "netbook" (or whatever comes out) will be, majority of people will still need just a basic ultra-portable computer with adequate price.

Only markets where Apple does rock&roll (market share wise) - beside not being typical computer market segments - are markets where Apple pricing is very competitive to competition. iPods - at least here in NZ - are equally priced, often even cheaper than equivalent Creative Zens and other brands. iPhone is more than price-competitive with high end Nokias, Blackerries and HTC - actually, handful of them are more expensive than iPhone and, arguably, are not offering more features.
post #60 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by TenoBell View Post

146 million notebooks were sold in 2008, while roughly 11 million netbooks were sold. Just to put their popularity in perspective.

And meanwhile perhaps 10 million Touches were sold in 2008 (13 million were sold from its first release in fall 2007 through end of 2008). with 3 million more now in the first quarter of 2009. it may have started as a better iPod, but once iPhone apps arrived last year it became much more - a mini net tablet.

So if/when apple releases a 9" Touch this year, it will blow the "junky" netbooks away (and they'll be selling for $99), more than doubling its current sales pace, dramatically surpassing all PC netbook sales.
post #61 of 98
Why on earth (or any other planet) would Apple want to build a low cost netbook to compete with all the other netbooks (and eat into their own highly profitable laptop business)? Although they seem to be selling in good numbers, It seems unlikely that any netbook manufacturer is making any profits on the little buggers. To throw out junk equipment would not enhance the Mac user experience. Apple does not make junk and hopefully never will.

Will the larger touch screen device be priced in the $300 to $500 range. Very doubtful. But it will be a slick machine built on quality equipment, based on an ever expanding software platform. No doubt it will be able to print, accept external keyboards and mice, and have other USB expandability. It will be a game changer for the long run, unlike the netbook fad, which, I predict, will fade as users realize how crummy they really are.

(Fire away!)
post #62 of 98
The point being that netbooks are not all that popular.....at least not so far.

Netbooks sell at an average price of $350, Macs sell at an average price of $1500. Which one is the better percentage to have?

Quote:
Originally Posted by teckstud View Post

7% over very few years- not bad.
Kinda of like Mac's share of computer sales- like 8 % over like how many years?
your point? so? and?
post #63 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by TenoBell View Post

The point being that netbooks are not all that popular.....at least not so far.

Netbooks sell at an average price of $350, Macs sell at an average price of $1500. Which one is the better percentage to have?

Yeah, cheap computing for the masses is a bad thing.

I just find it remarkable, that I now have a device, that fits in the palm of my hand, weighs 2.5 pounds, has an LED LCD, wireless, a mult-card reader, a HD twice the size of the one that came in my Mini, and the same GPU, more USB ports than a MB, and last Nov., it cost $350 for the AAO.

And it's powerful enough to do mundane things like browse the web, e-mail, run OOo, a few older games (like AoE III), and the Atom N270 is not to shabby. And if I had the 6-cell battery, I could easily get 4-5 hours out of it. And most important to me, I can choose what applications I want to run on it, and can run a variety of OS (currently Ubuntu 8.10, XP, and Win7 beta 1).

And Nvidia Ion platform is already available in nettops, and it uses the same 9400M found in current Macs. Now only if Adobe would rewrite Flash in CUDA. It's only a matter of time before it winds up in a new netbook.

I don't give a rat's ass about some logo or how some company can rape me on high profit margins. I love OSX, but I'm not that dense to pass up something that I think is a pretty good price/performance ratio, and I can even type pretty well on it too (like I am right now).
post #64 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post

Apple CFO Peter Oppenheimer on netbooks: "I see cramped keyboards, terrible software, junky hardware, very small screens. And just not a consumer experience and not something we would put the Mac brand on, quite frankly. It's not a segment we're interested in and we don't believe customers are interested in."

Oh, my mistake, I thought I liked my netbook. Let's see. My Dell Mini 12 has a perfect form factor, a nice minimalist design and good build quality. It has a comfortable keyboard with good action and a nicely sized 12" 1280x800 screen. The included Ubuntu software works flawlessly. It cost me $400.

On the other hand, the screen quality sucks. Glossy and reflective. I'm sure Apple would never use a screen like that!
post #65 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. H View Post

What planet is this guy on? He doesn't believe customers are interested? How come netbooks are selling so well then? People are buying products they don't want?

I think he is referring to the recent customer satisfaction study, which found that netbook customer satisfaction is very lower compared notebooks.
post #66 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. H View Post

What planet is this guy on? He doesn't believe customers are interested? How come netbooks are selling so well then? People are buying products they don't want?

He says he sees cramped keyboards and very small screens, then suggests an iPhone or iPod touch as an alernative? What the hell? Last I checked, a 3.5" iPhone screen is much smaller than the "very small" 8"+ screens on netbooks, and the on-screen keyboard of an iPhone is even more cramped than the physical netbook keyboards.

The only thing Oppenheimer got right in his quote above is the terrible software - that's why there's so much interest in installing OS X on netbooks.

Given Apple's apparent refusal to make a netbook, it's looking more and more likely that I'll be getting a Dell mini 9 or two and installing OS X on them.

Well, for me, I use my MacBook 13" White Core Duo for basically everything essential and work-related. iPhone 3G for everything really-on-the-go.

Then, a bang-for-buck AMD+ATI PC for gaming, Folding, and tinkering around.

For me, a netbook is rubbish.

Maybe something to do with my brain, although I have very good eyesight I really cannot operate a computer with anything less than 13". I start to feel a little dizzy, can't think as clearly. The iPhone 3G is great as it is because everything is mostly the right size and user-friendliness. But I'm a very, very light app user and I would not actually play any games on the iPhone 3G.

Well, that's my perspective on things.

You can bet your bottom dollar though that there is something in the 10" marketspace that is *not* a usual netbook that has potential... I think Apple is right, there's the opportunity for innovation there. It could be Apple, it may not be.

In the meantime, I'm looking at the best way to get 20"+ screens for my work and home... The best bang-for-buck visually and *ergonomically*.
post #67 of 98
I'm just waiting for the price of Alu Macbooks to come down and 4GB RAM costs to drop. Or, to say, let the technology filter down to the white Macbook price point... except with no more white!

Quote:
Originally Posted by 801 View Post

Net book?
After spending too much time on the ipod touch, I am ready for a larger version that I can see better, type on easier, with better reception, that I can run the game apps on, surf on, get on my time machine disk for reading and editing documents, and view a movie on, or listen to music.

I want a handpad I can read a newspaper on, read a book on, and answer my emails on. I don't expect a two handed touch typing system. It would be nice if I could skype on it too. I want to use Ical, safari, and Itunes. If you want to toss in a gps feature, OK, but that's too much like the phone. The compass and accelerometers would expand the game market, as long as they could talk to one another.

I don't want a phone ( G3 or G4 voice thang) . I don't want to take real pictures with it. I don't want to write a novel on it. I want a heavy duty touch, with a great screen, that I can network into my other Imacs, and use them for a remote drive. If you want a USB port, thats OK too, but not a deal breaker.

Decent battery life would be nice, and a decent amount of on board memory.

I am getting an Air, but I want something I don't have to read on my lap in bed. I figure that is what SJ is monkeying with at home right now. That, or driving the wife and kids crazy. It's half the reason I think he took off, to get better and get this project done.

Oh, and I want a baby blue unicorn and talks and poops rainbows.
post #68 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by teckstud View Post

Tecktroll? People want a small form factor- I don't care if it's 16:9-.4:3 -whatever. Small is in- that my point. You keep distorting it with screen ratios and everything you can conjure up in your kool-aid bag of tricks.

"kool-aid bag of tricks"
post #69 of 98
While on some level, the earnings call shed no new data, this is one of those cases where no news is actually GREAT news, something that I blogged about in:

ANALYSIS - Apple Quarterly Earnings Call: When No News is GREAT News
(http://bit.ly/2DmNZ)

Check it out if interested.

Mark
post #70 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by 801 View Post

Oh, and I want a baby blue unicorn and talks and poops rainbows.

That'll be extra.
post #71 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post

Apple's iPhone and Apple TV businesses

Yet no information about AppleTV.
post #72 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by applenewbie View Post

Why on earth (or any other planet) would Apple want to build a low cost netbook to compete with all the other netbooks

Because they are going to realize that their existing customer base is already buying netbooks.

Personally, I have no interest in them. But I see a lot of other Mac owners who are buying them. Especially owners of the 12" PowerBook.

They are a market segment that is going to stay and Apple needs sell into this space for the same reasons they sell a Mac mini.
post #73 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by OriginalMacRat View Post

Because they are going to realize that their existing customer base is already buying netbooks.

Personally, I have no interest in them. But I see a lot of other Mac owners who are buying them. Especially owners of the 12" PowerBook.

They are a market segment that is going to stay and Apple needs sell into this space for the same reasons they sell a Mac mini.

You see "a lot of other Mac owners" buying netbooks . . . to not run OS X and Apple applications??

So "a lot of other Mac owners" are buying into products that are the exact antithesis of Apple.

Right.

Or are these "other Mac owners" just the tech enthusiast niche that post on AI, like you and me that like to screw around with netbooks and hack them to run OS X?
post #74 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadra 610 View Post

Or are these "other Mac owners" just the tech enthusiast niche that post on AI, like you and me that like to screw around with netbooks and hack them to run OS X?

No.

Some have jobs that require lots of travel and they don't like carrying around a bulky MacBook.

Others are women who complain that the MacBook is too heavy.
post #75 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by teckstud View Post

Got Kool-aid?

- They are not selling as well- the figures and the writer of this article states that not me. Stop spinning lies and distortions.

selling better (percentage wise) than the market, and a world wide recession is lies and distortions?

heres a hint, let someone else wear the asshat for a while
I don't see how an anti M$ stance can be seen as a bad thing on an Apple forum I really can't!

nagromme - According to Amazon: "SpongBob Typing Tutor" is outselling Windows
Reply
I don't see how an anti M$ stance can be seen as a bad thing on an Apple forum I really can't!

nagromme - According to Amazon: "SpongBob Typing Tutor" is outselling Windows
Reply
post #76 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by teckstud View Post

You're laughable with your constant distortions and misrepresentations of what I or any others say against the doctrine.

well then, to paraphrase Billy Connelly "GO - OFF!"
I don't see how an anti M$ stance can be seen as a bad thing on an Apple forum I really can't!

nagromme - According to Amazon: "SpongBob Typing Tutor" is outselling Windows
Reply
I don't see how an anti M$ stance can be seen as a bad thing on an Apple forum I really can't!

nagromme - According to Amazon: "SpongBob Typing Tutor" is outselling Windows
Reply
post #77 of 98
This proves it. Apple has their head up their rear ends are getting high off the stench. Then explain why so many people are hacking their netbooks to run OS X and many want a netbook that runs OS X but don't know how or to afraid to hack.

The rumors of Apple's 10 inch something project are driving people like me mad with anticipation which will probably end in major frustration just like the 13 inch MacBooks did and every product released in the last 5 years.

This is just Apple's way of saying we don't have the engineering know how how to build a netbook or a 10 inch laptop with full features like HDMI, several USB/firewire ports, or anything useful that we as customers want.

Blu-ray, a bag of hurt,

No Flash in iphone/ipod touch-too complicated,

Replaceable battery in MacBook Air, iphone/touch-Can't be done (use carbon fiber and it can like the Voodoo Envy).

No firewire in 13 inch Mac Book-it appeals to a different group and people don't need it.

Anything useful that uses 3G, sorry no can do, we support only tech that makes you buy music, shows, movies and services from us and our partners at ridiculous cost and anything of value to you is not allowed.

Tethering-hell no, well maybe me if you sell your first born but then we will still stop you from skyping or accessing sling player.

Problem with screens being too reflective- sorry that looks better to us so shut up and just buy our product or prepare to be socially ostracized

future excuse-Its our mission to stop putting in CD/DVD drives in our computers so you can't watch any content you have available on CD/DVD so you must download your content from us.

Seems like everything we want is being countered with some BS and then they add customers don't want it and they are too cool to make crap. Dude wake up You have made nothing but crap the last 5 years.

The iphone, with version 3 is what a basic iphone should have been at launch. Trying to use your fingers is a nightmare. Especially trying to edit or cut, copy and paste. With a stylus they would not need those two end quotes or points. No keyboard or support for 3rd party BT keyboards, so how do you do much of anything on that device. I admit, i like the browser but no flash support is sick.


Seriously folks Apple has really lost its way, being an Apple fan boy for nearly 3 decades, i am ashamed of what they have become. They are now Big Blue. They have become what their founders hated. Think Different. Well Apple its time you Think Different. Start innovating again and listening to what we want. Stop making deals with companies that hurt your customers like AT&T. You walked away from NBC (as you said) so AT&T is a bully. I too have been waiting to buy a new mac, laptop, etc but they are not giving me what i need. Their hardware is dated and needs to be updated. They still don't have a mac that can kill at PC games, no quad core, no blu-ray, HDMI, etc. Seriously at your prices, i should be getting a lot more then coolness and social status.

Vote with your dollars folks and let Apple know that we the consumers are the ones with the power. They do what we want and not the other way around. Their big head needs to be shrunk. If you are a mac Fanboy/loyalist, then you must help Apple find its way again as it is drunk with power and blinded with greed. Steve Jobs lost his mind just like this and he was tossed out. Yeah his insanity/genius made Apple what it is today and saved them from ruin, but he is going over the edge again and now he has brainwashed cronies to do his bidding. So vote with your dollars don't buy their crap until they give us what we want and save Apple.

By the way Steve Jobs favorite phrase is "a sucker is born everyday". So, time for you to ask yourself, are you one?
post #78 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by teckstud View Post

7% over very few years- not bad.
Kinda of like Mac's share of computer sales- like 8 % over like how many years?
your point? so? and?

did you read that part in the report that said, "we want to sell the BEST computers, NOT the MOST" ??
I don't see how an anti M$ stance can be seen as a bad thing on an Apple forum I really can't!

nagromme - According to Amazon: "SpongBob Typing Tutor" is outselling Windows
Reply
I don't see how an anti M$ stance can be seen as a bad thing on an Apple forum I really can't!

nagromme - According to Amazon: "SpongBob Typing Tutor" is outselling Windows
Reply
post #79 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by teckstud View Post

Why must you always challenge me? You always loose. The 13inch MacBook is 2 inches wider than the 12inch PowerBook. Put down your KoolAid and look it up -I dare you. You're laughable- you can't read text on an 11 " display? Right and that's why netbooks are designed primarily just for that and they go down to 5 inches.

Who really gives a shit that a notebook is 2" wider? It's primarily weight and short enough so the seat in front of you doesn't crush your notebook. Width helps in keeping the keyboards a little bigger.

The 10" netbooks primary weakness however is height resolution. 1024x576 sucks. But higher resolution screens should fix that. Of course, it'll be a bit smaller text wise at 1366x768 but bumping it up to 11-12" and you're not that much smaller than a MB.

There's a reason why netbooks have had a steady progression from 7" to 9" to 10" with some 12" ones. Folks want smaller and lighter yes, but they don't need ultra small unless it fits in a pocket. The MBA is a perfectly suitable lightweight machine. It's just a tad pricey.

I like my wife's 10" Lenovo netbook and steal it a lot for work. I wouldn't bother with a 9" tablet but given Apple's consumer focus I could see them going with a tablet over a netbook. It's just nearly as useful without a keyboard.
post #80 of 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by iLad View Post

Seriously folks Apple has really lost its way...

Right...which is Dell is on the ropes (with all the stuff you say is critical) and Apple is doing better than most of the industry. Because Apple has no clue on how to keep customers happy.

I recommend you go buy a Dell and help keep them from getting bought out by some Chinese company.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Discussion
AppleInsider › Forums › General › General Discussion › Notes of interest from Apple's Q209 quarterly conference call