or Connect
AppleInsider › Forums › Mac Hardware › Current Mac Hardware › Apple fires its return salvo as Microsoft issues misleading 5th ad
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Apple fires its return salvo as Microsoft issues misleading 5th ad - Page 8

post #281 of 321
Is MS giving the "Hunters" the budget mentioned in each ad and letting them keep the change? Or are they only paying for the actual cost of the computer? It seems unclear to me, maybe I'm slow.

If MS gave me money to buy a computer I would spend every penny.
post #282 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisj979 View Post

I mean MACs don't have spyware and viruses NOT because they are better, but because the creators "don't bother" Like buying a HUGO, car jacker don't bother.

That argument never made sense to me. Apple already gets one-third of every dollar spent on computers in the US, and for machines that are over $1000 they gets over two-thirds of every dollar. Car jackers steal an expensive car because they can get more money out of the one, surely software doesnt work the same but you are saying that their is no market for a thief to steal from the most affluent PC buying consumers. That doesnt make sense.

The argument is that they do steal from the most expensive system, which are servers, but Linux and Unix users are rampant on the internet with about half, I think, of the web servers being Linux running Apache and holding the CC numbers of millions upon million of customers along with other valuable data, yet they seem to only attack Windows PC, by your reckoning.

That doesnt add up. BTW, people do steal cheap cars all the time. Stealing is mostly about opportunity, the marketshare does add to that but its not the only factor, and Mac and Linux marketshare is more than sufficient for thieves if only it was easier to do.

PS: Apple had viruses prior to Mac OS X when their marketshare was considerably lower than it is now.

PPS: Using a car analogy will not help an argument.
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
post #283 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadra 610 View Post

Correct.

Apple is an industry leader. Market share in terms of premium products is always lower, but Apple owns the market share at the Premium end - well over 70% of it. And the overall share at the Premium end is a lot smaller. It's a pyramid and we're looking at the the top or near the top. So people with enough disposable income or otherwise enogh to spend comfortably on a Mac of some sort (and the ability to actually deliver on their own tastes) are choosing Macs. This of course makes MS/PC-ware not only look cheaper, but consigns their image to bargain-bin status. Not good. And the MS ads are doing a wonderful job of reinforcing this message. I'm not sure who would want to associate themselves with it, apart from those who simply have no choice. Lauren, Giampaolo, and all those examples of consumers WANT Macs. They simply aren't in a position to afford them. It seems MS inadvertently delivers this message along with the "we're cheaper" message. Perhaps there's really no divorcing one from the other, anyway. You decide.

MS can only dream of owning the most coveted portion of the market - the high-margin, higher-income end. This end of the market not only presents less pressure in terms of production, but it also tends to esatblish product image and exclusivity - something to be coveted. And it helps keep you honest in terms of quality and fit-and-finish. Nothing but the best for this end of the market. This tip of the market pyramid can singlehandedly push your product into "must-have" status.

MS is to varying degrees locked out of this end.

Apple is the most significant tech player of our time. With the market share they have (kept exclusive and "Premium-oriented"), Apple now has more cash on hand than Microsoft. With a fraction of the production. Apple doesn't do high volume Macs and OS X. They don't want to, nor should they. That will only dilute product image and eventually, quality. MS only wishes it could pull off the kind of margins Apple can. But the average peson looks at an MS/PC product and the last thing they think of is tasteful, functional beauty.

MS' recent ads are simply meant to increase sales at any cost - mostly of PC's which come with Windows installed anyway. All this really does in the long run is just slag on MS and the other PC manufacturers. It effectively kills any chance they have of pushing further into the Premium end. But this is what happens when you scrape from the bottom.

And where do you get these numbers from? Like an Apple fan you think INSIDE THE BOX, so let me help you out of the box. MOST COMPANIES have buildings upon buildings full of WINDOWS OS RUNNING PC's. Everyone is taking up for Apples high prices by saying they are targeting a different audience, people with disposable incomes. I in a sense agree cause they are targeting a certain audience, people who ONLY surf the net and check e-mail, and DJ's, and those who don't know better. Look I have a PC and I can CHOOSE which monitor I want. How is MAC delivering on my taste when I can't even get a black monitor.

Now you say apple own's 70% of the premium end, I find that odd considering the number of gamers that use WINDOWS gaming rigs starting at around $2500, ever heard of Alienware? Also Dell has a workstation called a Precision which is on NUMERIOUS trade floors, doctors offices, realestate offices, etc. running for Power Users or just as small servers, or for people who just want a super powerful PC, those things cost around $3500+, fact of the matter is you do not find too many MACs in businesses, not to say they are not there cause they are but they are still WAYYYY outnumbered by PC's running Windows no matter what price range. In fact most companies that use MAC's also use PC's, you cannot say that about companies that use PCs.

My point is, there are many Windows PC's selling that cost $3000+, more than the 30% you mention. And please don't get me started on the countless Windows Servers that EVEN THE COMPANY YOU WORK FOR has in a Server room with all that "business critical" data. Some of those servers cost $10,000+. But there are wayyyy more Workstation Windows PC's being sold for $3000+ than there are MAC's being sold for $2000. I guess that's why Apple will be lowering prices cause it owns the Premium end.

So how is Windows LOCKED OUT again????
post #284 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by solipsism View Post

That argument never made sense to me. Apple already gets one-third of every dollar spent on computers in the US, and for machines that are over $1000 they gets over two-thirds of every dollar. Car jackers steal an expensive car because they can get more money out of the one, surely software doesnt work the same but you are saying that their is no market for a thief to steal from the most affluent PC buying consumers. That doesnt make sense.

The argument is that they do steal from the most expensive system, which are servers, but Linux and Unix users are rampant on the internet with about half, I think, of the web servers being Linux running Apache and holding the CC numbers of millions upon million of customers along with other valuable data, yet they seem to only attack Windows PC, by your reckoning.

That doesnt add up. BTW, people do steal cheap cars all the time. Stealing is mostly about opportunity, the marketshare does add to that but its not the only factor, and Mac and Linux marketshare is more than sufficient for thieves if only it was easier to do.

PS: Apple had viruses prior to Mac OS X when their marketshare was considerably lower than it is now.

PPS: Using a car analogy will not help an argument.

Tell that to all the other countless people on here using car analogys. But when I use it for PC's you try to VOID it. The point was IT COMES WITH THE TERRITORY. They say don't buy a PC cause of the virus risk or it crashes so MAC is better. No that depends on what you use a computer for.

So if you buy a benz you have more risk, does that mean a HUGO is better "NO" That was my point, sorry it flew over you. Like I said think outside the box. WOW you alook like the first in this forum to admit that APPLE's get viruses, cause others explain it like they NEVER do, just read above.

I'm glad you are able to break down why people steal cars now I know. But in real life people steal cars for various reasons. Just like no car is car jack proof, Apple is not virus or crash proof. Look I made my point again.
post #285 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisj979 View Post

My point is, there are many Windows PC's selling that cost $3000+, more than the 30% you mention. And please don't get me started on the countless Windows Servers that EVEN THE COMPANY YOU WORK FOR has in a Server room with all that "business critical" data. Some of those servers cost $10,000+. But there are wayyyy more Workstation Windows PC's being sold for $3000+ than there are MAC's being sold for $2000. I guess that's why Apple will be lowering prices cause it owns the Premium end.

Here is one CNN Money article about NPD data...
http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com...ce=yahoo_quote PS: Dont confuse a consumer desktop with a business workstation and server. There are reasons why data is collected from different groups and this one is from consumers.
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
post #286 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisj979 View Post

I'm glad you are able to break down why people steal cars now I know. But in real life people steal cars for various reasons. Just like no car is car jack proof, Apple is not virus or crash proof. Look I made my point again.

You did make the same point again while using the same car analogy again. Could you at least change up the models being stolen? And I have asked people to not use the analogy, often it fits well but jsut as often it does not and its so over used that no one cares anymore. Like Paris Hilton or Kim Kardashian, so over used that no one cares anymore.

No one here who knows any computing history will deny that Macs have had viruses, but it was prior to the switch of Mac OS X. Apple dropped their previous OS because it was antiquated. Got that?! They had a crappy system that required them to clean house, buy NeXT to get the Mac platform back on track.

Also, no one said that Macs arent hackable, crushable, or infallible. They are all of those things, but the likelihood of these happening are much less because of Apples business model, not in spite of it. When you decide to build the HW and SW. They have a limited product lineup and use a modular, modern OS that affords them certain benefits that MS cant get. But MS model affords them the ability to have a much higher marketshare. This is business, this is life, there are always tradeoffs.
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
post #287 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisj979 View Post

How is MAC delivering on my taste when I can't even get a black monitor.

Best line of the day.
post #288 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisj979 View Post

I use my computer for more than just email and internet, and I'm not a DJ.

Best line of the day.
post #289 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by hiimamac View Post

Now with regard to market research, they would have found that 10s of thousands of audio users were furious the FireWire got dumped and it was not about size but more about a better gpu and not wanting pro users to buy the low end. They would have also found that all the new iLife trainees had FireWire camcorders so IMHO they did not do their research or rather, they did but they want the end user to pay up if they want these missing features.

Oooo-kay... So why is FW still in their *lowest* priced laptop?
post #290 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by solipsism View Post

Here is one CNN Money article about NPD data...
http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com...ce=yahoo_quote PS: Dont confuse a consumer desktop with a business workstation and server. There are reasons why data is collected from different groups and this one is from consumers.

Only problem there is, report is looking at brand names.

I know only one person having reasonably expensive branded PC - one of Dell XPS boxes - and comparably huge number of them having even more expensive custom built boxes. Of course, it is hard to get real numbers on $1000+ custom boxes out there so reports like one you've mentioned will simply ignore them, but that makes such reports without real value.

Additionally, report is - I presume - based on US numbers, right? We all know that US is Apple's stronghold. Dilute those numbers with the rest of the world, add custom built boxes strong with home users/enthusiasts, and number will be quite a bit different.
post #291 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisj979 View Post

Yes MAC OS boots faster, IT DOES LESS.

No, it doesn't. Where did you get this ridiculous idea??
post #292 of 321
delete
post #293 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisj979 View Post

Apple is not virus or crash proof.

There is currently no way to remotely infect OS X. There are still no documented viruses in the wild for OS X. Haven't been for nearly 9 years. No virus or malware has ever, ever, brought an OS X install to its knees. Not once. The best that anyone's done from early 2001 to now is a couple of trojans that aren't able to do any damage.

And the rarity of crashes is the exception that proves the rule.

OS X, for all intents and purposes, is virus-proof and crash-proof. As it has always been.
post #294 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stashman View Post

I would hardly call tying Mac OS X to Apple hardware as a disadvantage of owning a Mac. If you own a Mac you will able to run Mac OS X and if you wanted to Windows or Linux on the same Apple box. What I think you are trying to say is that Mac OS X is disadvantaged by not being able run on any old PC hardware.

The point is that the Mac platform is more than just the software, the hardware is designed to work with the software and vs versa. This is why the Mac offers a better user experience to users. If you just take the bits you want you will end up with a compromised solution. Also how on earth could you expect Apple to certify it's OS capable of running on Joe Bloggs computer. Microsoft tries to do this and the user experience is not pleasant. Many PCs are sold with inferior hardware which is substandard and prone to failure. You can blatantly see this in the poor viewing viewing angles and washed out colours on your supermarket laptop display.

I wouldn't agree that Mac hardware is designed for OSX. Mac hardware works fine with Windows and Linux as well, which means it is pretty much general hardware compatibility wise. Mac hardware does have drivers designed for OSX, but so do any other hardware used for other platforms.

Apple does have advantage that comes from it's disadvantage - limited number of hardware devices supported is so small it makes it so much easier to test both hardware and drivers before hitting market... but even then, new Macs quite often have an issue or two with their 1st revisions, much as I have observed.

Other things - experience, integration etc. - I can't really comment, to be honest; still haven't got Mac, or iPhone, or iPod, or (you name it). Obviously Apple is making extra effort on integration/experience front with included applications and other gear they are offering, but is it enough to compensate for (what I personally observe as) disadvantages - I don't know.
post #295 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by solipsism View Post

Absolutes are never good thing, so how about... "The market for a mid-range headless Mac solution is not large enough and, by extension, not profitable enough for Apple to care about at this time"

Or is it because Apple thinks it would cut deeply into other Mac sales..?
post #296 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by solipsism View Post

I wouldn't call it being pissed. It's business.

Are you saying that Apple is so insignificant that MS would consider them a mosquito? In OS marketshare sure, but in value as a company, and surely the other PC vendors (where Apple actually competes head to head) they take most of the profitable market.

Portion of interview transcript, Bob Garfield from AdAge interviewing Bill Gates during the Corbis Creativity 2.0 panel in Manhattan:
GARFIELD: I want to ask you one more thing: Those Mac ads — how do you feel about the John Hodgman character?
GATES: I can’t comment on someone else’s ad.
GARFIELD: OK … but he’s you.
GATES: Yeah, I’m not gonna comment on someone else’s ad.
GARFIELD: OK, well, Bill Gates, thank you so much for joining us.
(Silence)
GARFIELD: Can I just have a clean goodbye?
(Silence)
GARFIELD: OK, can you just say goodbye? Thank you or goodbye or something like that?
GATES: Goodbye.
--------------------

Gates does sound pissed of, to my opinion. Must say I never thought that way, but PC and Mac guy can easily translate into Gates and Jobs, thus ads can be taken very personal.

True it is business, but Apple has pushed some limits in this case - and by a margin. While there is as strong competition between PC brands, I can't recall seeing any of them constantly having fun on other's behalf - and for years. I can't recall anything like that in any other market.

Quote:
My aunt just called me up yesterday. She is having BSOD on her notebook periodically. Her machine also takes 10 minutes to boot up with Kaspersey running and it's dog slow. This was not the case when she first got it.

I'm really sad to hear that. On the other hand, for our only client with some Macs, small publishing house, I recently had to recover from backup couple of files corrupted while being saved from Macs to a server share.

There was a reason why that happened twice in a single week and never again, and there is a reason why your aunt have her issues. There is also a solution to pretty much any problem in IT. If you are implying that your aunt is condemned to such things because she has PC, it simply isn't true.
post #297 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadra 610 View Post

It gets repetitive after a while, but this is an Apple fansite. All fansites/entusiast sites are like this, whether it's about Macs, Harleys, or whatever brand of TV.

Mac people repeating their stuff, Pc people repeating their stuff - all good fun!
post #298 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadra 610 View Post

Correct.

Apple is an industry leader. Market share in terms of premium products is always lower, but Apple owns the market share at the Premium end - well over 70% of it.

I've already posted on this topic, but I'll indulge in repeating.

All market studies I have seen are considering only branded boxes. However, in high-end home market - enthusiast market - number of custom built boxes is much higher then in low end (relative to market share).

In short, there is a big number of very expensive custom built PCs that no one is taking into account. And most if not all of them are running on Windows.

Just look at numbers of expensive motherboards from Gigabyte, Asus, MSI, DFI, Foxcon, E EVGA and others - some of them getting close to US$500. Look at the choice of premium cases, cooling solutions, power supplies, high end graphics, mods; they exist because there is demand for them. Enthusiast market is more than big enough to make difference in those premium segment stats, if you take custom built boxes into account.
post #299 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Millmoss View Post

Possibly, but I'm still not convinced of the wisdom of Microsoft's approach. Look how long Apple has been running their "I'm a Mac" campaign. It's got legs because it builds the image of the product and the company in the minds of consumers. You see this in a lot of ad campaigns. I think probably the best of them don't try to be momentary and forgettable. Microsoft has tried the opposite approach -- the advertising equivalent to negative political campaigning. Driving up the other guy's negatives is the kind of approach you take when you're behind. You hope it hurts them more than it hurts you.

Wouldn't know - Mac ads are not aired here in NZ, I can only see them on the net.

I think that MS advertising people are still searching for the right formula, so these notebook hunters are just a phase; they are cheap to make, don't have celebrities (Justin Long must cost something nowadays!) and are expendable. I do have a feeling we'll see more of a variety once Windows 7 is out - I wouldn't be surprised to learn that MS marketing people are, at this point, already spending much more time and money on W7 ads than they are doing on presently aired ads.

Mac ads wise, they were novelty when they started, but today they are more like "me, too". Old news. Another take on the same topic. Definitely not fresh any more. I think Apple should make an effort to re-invent their advertising as well. There is only that much you can tell with one uniformed form of advertising...
post #300 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpellino View Post

Oooo-kay... So why is FW still in their *lowest* priced laptop?

I font want to teach this lesson again but will give short version. A while back on board gma benchmarked at 171% opengl but you could not play games but could run pro apps. Apple realizing this crippled it and thevlast black and white MacBook had gma x3100 (can't recall model) and the opengl dropped from 171% down to 70%. No more pro apps

Then came newerbmodels with much better gpu so you can run pro apps, problem is, no firewire means no camera connection nor high end FireWire audio cards/devices.

In a nutshell, dedicated gpu allows pro apps with a gitcga if no FireWire thaye why and the white mb may have FireWire but very weak gpu so no pro apps. Thats why.

Peace.
post #301 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by hiimamac View Post

I font want to teach this lesson again but will give short version. A while back on board gma benchmarked at 171% opengl but you could not play games but could run pro apps. Apple realizing this crippled it and thevlast black and white MacBook had gma x3100 (can't recall model) and the opengl dropped from 171% down to 70%. No more pro apps

Then came newerbmodels with much better gpu so you can run pro apps, problem is, no firewire means no camera connection nor high end FireWire audio cards/devices.

In a nutshell, dedicated gpu allows pro apps with a gitcga if no FireWire thaye why and the white mb may have FireWire but very weak gpu so no pro apps. Thats why.

Peace.

Their cheapest model now has NVIDIA 9400 *and* firewire. Except for the DDR2 vs DDR3 it's the machine you need for low end and video and pro apps and games and audio... So the evidence still points to FW being a space issue on the MacBook 13 ALU.
post #302 of 321
Isn't there an adapter you can use with the Firewire? What's the big deal?

I have a Canon digital camera - nothing crazy but it's still one of the better ones out there (SD 1000). I don't even connect it to my Mac. I simply plug the SD card into the little USB adapter I have and that's it. There's an adapter for everything and a lot of them tend to be fairly inexpensive, and in the case of the SD card adapter, incredibly useful.
post #303 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikon133 View Post

Wouldn't know - Mac ads are not aired here in NZ, I can only see them on the net.

I think that MS advertising people are still searching for the right formula, so these notebook hunters are just a phase; they are cheap to make, don't have celebrities (Justin Long must cost something nowadays!) and are expendable. I do have a feeling we'll see more of a variety once Windows 7 is out - I wouldn't be surprised to learn that MS marketing people are, at this point, already spending much more time and money on W7 ads than they are doing on presently aired ads.

Mac ads wise, they were novelty when they started, but today they are more like "me, too". Old news. Another take on the same topic. Definitely not fresh any more. I think Apple should make an effort to re-invent their advertising as well. There is only that much you can tell with one uniformed form of advertising...

It seems that Microsoft is forever searching for the right formula in their advertising. In the past it didn't matter too much -- they got most of their sales by default anyway. They still do, but now they are in the position where it would be very useful for them to have a positive, comprehensible corporate image in the minds of the public, and they don't quite seem to know how it's done. Apple has been masterful at this. Probably most people could tell you what Apple is about in a few words. How many could do the same for Microsoft?
Please don't be insane.
Reply
Please don't be insane.
Reply
post #304 of 321
You happen to have a (still?) camera that uses an SD card. For that you're all set. Lots of people have lots of MiniDV and FW audio not to mention hard drives. I haven't looked since the intro of the MacBook 13 ALU but there was exactly one USB 2.0 > FW adapter on the market, and that one did not have Mac drivers.

USB 2.0 claims of equivalent speed are valid only under certain conditions, and the real world sustained performance on hard drives and other devices is going to be lower.

Steve's infamous "you don't need it" private email to an end user was an uncharacteristic public version of what he's famous for doing in house. Notice nobody at Apple has repeated it officially.

eMacs and Minis and every iMac since the DV have had FireWire, so it's not a "pro" feature.

And it's not obsolete or else it wouldn't be on every other later model.

It's space. It'll likely be back.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadra 610 View Post

Isn't there an adapter you can use with the Firewire? What's the big deal?

I have a Canon digital camera - nothing crazy but it's still one of the better ones out there (SD 1000). I don't even connect it to my Mac. I simply plug the SD card into the little USB adapter I have and that's it. There's an adapter for everything and a lot of them tend to be fairly inexpensive, and in the case of the SD card adapter, incredibly useful.
post #305 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpellino View Post

You happen to have a (still?) camera that uses an SD card. For that you're all set. Lots of people have lots of MiniDV and FW audio not to mention hard drives.

USB 2.0 claims of equivalent speed are valid only under certain conditions, and the real world sustained performance on hard drives and other devices is going to be lower.

eMacs and Minis and every iMac since the DV have had FireWire, so it's not a "pro" feature.

And it's not obsolete or else it wouldn't be on every other later model.

It's space. It'll likely be back.

Absolutely. USB2, beyond input devices, just doesn't cut it on so many levels.

The first MacBook Pro (Intel processor) omitted FireWire 800. This was accompanied by howls from users. In the Rev.B version, FireWire 800 was back. I suspect we'll see FireWire 800 in the unibody MacBook along with other hardware tweaks in the Rev.B version.

The moral? Never buy a Rev.A Mac.
Macintosh: It just WORKS!
Reply
Macintosh: It just WORKS!
Reply
post #306 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisj979 View Post

Now you say apple own's 70% of the premium end, I find that odd considering the number of gamers that use WINDOWS gaming rigs starting at around $2500, ever heard of Alienware?

Methinks you and nikon133 are doing a great job at confusing sticker price with profit margins...
post #307 of 321
Quote:
Now you say apple own's 70% of the premium end, I find that odd considering the number of gamers that use WINDOWS gaming rigs starting at around $2500, ever heard of Alienware?

Alienware laptops? Talk about hideous design. 20lbs. with freon cooling systems?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DocNo42 View Post

Methinks you and nikon133 are doing a great job at confusing sticker price with profit margins...

Actually Apple has above 60% of the +$1000 LAPTOP market.
The desktop market is where Apple lags pretty miserably.

Apple STILL needs to release a headless desktop machine that falls somewhere in between the MacPro and Mac mini.

I really fail to understand why Windows lovers lurk on geeky Mac forums.

Do they think we're dumb fuck Stockholm Syndrome suffering Windows users dying for abuse, who will all suddenly see the dark, chuck our MacBook Pros and buy a Dell running Vista or Ubuntu?


I guess it's like foam-at-the-mouth Jesus freaks preaching on the subway. There's nothing to be said to get them to shut up or go away... just screw in the earbuds a little deeper or pull the book closer to your face and wait for your stop.
Macintosh: It just WORKS!
Reply
Macintosh: It just WORKS!
Reply
post #308 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpellino View Post

I haven't looked since the intro of the MacBook 13 ALU but there was exactly one USB 2.0 > FW adapter on the market, and that one did not have Mac drivers.

Ouch, I didn't know that.

Mind you, my SD card to USB adapter doesn't need drivers, you just plug it in and go. I suppose Firewire to USB is a different story.
post #309 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffharris View Post

Alienware laptops? Talk about hideous design. 20lbs. with freon cooling systems?



Actually Apple has above 60% of the +$1000 LAPTOP market.
The desktop market is where Apple lags pretty miserably.

Apple STILL needs to release a headless desktop machine that falls somewhere in between the MacPro and Mac mini.

I really fail to understand why Windows lovers lurk on geeky Mac forums.

Do they think we're dumb fuck Stockholm Syndrome suffering Windows users dying for abuse, who will all suddenly see the dark, chuck our MacBook Pros and buy a Dell running Vista or Ubuntu?


I guess it's like foam-at-the-mouth Jesus freaks preaching on the subway. There's nothing to be said to get them to shut up or go away... just screw in the earbuds a little deeper or pull the book closer to your face and wait for your stop.

Completely agree with you on the Windows "lost souls" comment.

There is absolutely no way I could ever go back to Windows. I've already soiled my MBP with Windows (via Bootcamp) in the past, just to play EVE Online, but since I've left the MMO world my Windows XP CD has functioned quite nicely as a decorative coaster.

As for the whole Apple-needs-to-make-a-headless-desktop issue . . . I think they've caught on to the reality that desktops are a dying breed, at least in their current form. Notebooks are where the market is now, and we're heading toward greater and greater miniaturization. If anything, the Mac Mini is the form factor of the future if we're talking headless, but it currently can only handle so much. I think even the Mac Pros will at some point get smaller. Bigger (and thinner) displays are the big thing, not bigger towers and cases.

The gamer market is a different story, but the PC-gamer seems to be a dying breed as well, at least in the big-case + a ton of cards and fans sense. The ones that like to build and mix and match parts in order to max out their Crysis framerates (overclockers, too) just to make the kid next door cry harer seem to be just a niche of the tech enthusiast market, which is small enough as it is.
post #310 of 321
You know, I've read many of these posts and they have a common thread, that is; My dad can beat up your dad; my car is faster than your car, my p&@#% is larger than your p&@#% . Does it really matter? use what you like and be happy, in this world you get what you pay for. Be happy with your choice or find something that makes you happy. Somebody was right in an earlier post, this is like a broken record...
Mac user since 1990 - System 6.0.7 through OS X 10.6 - Mac Mini (2009) - 4/320 - Snow Leopard
Reply
Mac user since 1990 - System 6.0.7 through OS X 10.6 - Mac Mini (2009) - 4/320 - Snow Leopard
Reply
post #311 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Millmoss View Post

It seems that Microsoft is forever searching for the right formula in their advertising. In the past it didn't matter too much -- they got most of their sales by default anyway. They still do, but now they are in the position where it would be very useful for them to have a positive, comprehensible corporate image in the minds of the public, and they don't quite seem to know how it's done. Apple has been masterful at this. Probably most people could tell you what Apple is about in a few words. How many could do the same for Microsoft?

Not that many, likely. Guess that is where P&B are supposed to jump in and fill the gap. They've just started, though...
post #312 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikon133 View Post

Not that many, likely. Guess that is where P&B are supposed to jump in and fill the gap. They've just started, though...

Advertising firms can't tell a company what they are all about; it has to go the other way. One of Steve's major contributions to the revival of Apple was refocusing the company philosophy. When a company can tell their ad firm what message they want consumers to hear, a good ad firm can help them a lot more than when they're casting around for one.
Please don't be insane.
Reply
Please don't be insane.
Reply
post #313 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadra 610 View Post

No, it doesn't. Where did you get this ridiculous idea??

Does it have a Media Player built in? How about .net framework? should I go on? Like I say IT DOES LESS. Ridiculous idea, i think not.
post #314 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadra 610 View Post

No, it doesn't. Where did you get this ridiculous idea??

Quote:
Originally Posted by solipsism View Post

You did make the same point again while using the same car analogy again. Could you at least change up the models being stolen? And I have asked people to not use the analogy, often it fits well but jsut as often it does not and its so over used that no one cares anymore. Like Paris Hilton or Kim Kardashian, so over used that no one cares anymore.

No one here who knows any computing history will deny that Macs have had viruses, but it was prior to the switch of Mac OS X. Apple dropped their previous OS because it was antiquated. Got that?! They had a crappy system that required them to clean house, buy NeXT to get the Mac platform back on track.

Also, no one said that Macs arent hackable, crushable, or infallible. They are all of those things, but the likelihood of these happening are much less because of Apples business model, not in spite of it. When you decide to build the HW and SW. They have a limited product lineup and use a modular, modern OS that affords them certain benefits that MS cant get. But MS model affords them the ability to have a much higher marketshare. This is business, this is life, there are always tradeoffs.


OK FOR THE SLOWou WWW PEOPLE IN THE ROOM. As I was saying certain things come with the territory, weather it's buying a TV or a car. Since me changing the brands will make it EASIER for you to understand. An SUV comes with certain drawbacks than if yu buy a car, but it also has it's advantages. If I have a family of 7 an SUV serves me better than a car, duhhhhhh. Sorry you could not understand that certain things come with the territory.
post #315 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by solipsism View Post

Here is one CNN Money article about NPD data...

http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com...ce=yahoo_quote PS: Don’t confuse a consumer desktop with a business workstation and server. There are reasons why data is collected from different groups and this one is from consumers.

Sorry I DID NOT confuse consumer with business, YOU DID NOT SPECIFY. But the better question is how many PC's for consumers do you see that cost $1000+? The thing about your comparison is when MOST people look for a PC they look for UNDER $1000 which are just as good or better than the MAC they would spend $1000+. That's like Pioneer saying they own 70% of ythe TV market for TV's over $5000, but not too many others make TV's in that price range so it is considered a FALSE POSITIVE.

Lets look at the complete picture and see how big (small) that 70% actually is:
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles...s_decline.html

70% looks like alot when you cut the picture to taylor your argument.

I'll end my argument cause MOST people who use PC's understand computers alot better and use computers in a completely different way than PEOPLE who use MACS.
post #316 of 321
You're trolling ! Let's see how you'll eat this !

The most correct statistics about market share

Windows - 87.9%
Mac - 9.73%
Linux - 1.02%
iPhone - 0.55%
iPod Touch - 0.15%
Android - 0.07%
Other - 0.32%

And... Apple have... 9.73+0.55+0.15 = 10.43% - The highest percent in "Company market share" nomination.
Higher than such companies as HP, Dell, Asus, etc.
The greatest company !


P.S. Congratulations ! Linux now have 1% !
When it'll become more "usable", Linux will eat a LOT of Windows's market share !
post #317 of 321
But I don't want Apple to grab a LOT of market share.
In that case it will allow MAC OS to be installed on PCs and replace the Microsoft,
and will become so ugly and boring like M$ !

Apple, please, don't be too greedy ! Don't grow bigger than 25% !
Leave the place for Linux, FreeBSD and other "human" systems !
post #318 of 321
I am a PC. I've been running Vista since launch and have gotten no viruses. No need for antivirus, but there are great, free programs such as Antivir. MS cannot include software bundled with it's OS because they would get sued, just like they have been for bundling media player and IE. Macs are prettier than most PC's if not all, but I build my own systems and can upgrade my video card in my ~$1,000 system. To have that ability in a Mac you have to spend more than 2 grand. I would like to buy a Mac but want a tower for ~$1,000 which doesn't look like it will happen. I'll probably get an iPhone though, I'm tired of my WinMo phone. Mac Ads are lies, don't see how people can get mad over PC ads. Oh, my OS also does not freeze, even running beta/RC Seven. I do not need to go into the future 100 years to see if it's not freezing, because it's not now. I mainly joined this forum for iPhone info and figured i'd share my opinion. If there's anything wrong with what I posted, feel free to correct me.
post #319 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by lathode View Post

I am a PC..

Thanks for sharing.
post #320 of 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by piot View Post

Thanks for sharing.

im a little teapot.
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
Dick Applebaum on whether the iPad is a personal computer: "BTW, I am posting this from my iPad pc while sitting on the throne... personal enough for you?"
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Current Mac Hardware
AppleInsider › Forums › Mac Hardware › Current Mac Hardware › Apple fires its return salvo as Microsoft issues misleading 5th ad