When is the United States going to recover from Democratic Rule?

My guess is likely never. The damage to institutions from the Democrats this time will be too great for anyone to trust them again no matter what party is in power.

That of course presumes there would be anything worth saving in the first place.

A few points...

The bailout of AIG has now cost us double what we spent on New Orleans due to Hurricane Katrina. Both are small compared to all the bailouts overall.

The rule of law is gone. Contracts are temporary things that are easily broken by the government on the whims of politicians. Secured bond holder really means greedy speculator who shouldn't be repaid or even considered on proper legal terms. Rule of law really means, I'm better than you because of my background unless I'm not better than you in which case it is your fault because I am disadvantaged.

Pax Americana is still here and is thriving better than ever. We are sending more troops to more places and of course the media will help spin how out of Iraq really didn't mean come home, just be redeployed abroad to places that evoke bettery imagery.

The media has just completely given up reporting news because they would rather worship their messiah. It's June and Obama still isn't funny in any fashion. The media is dying and spinning their own death. Newsweek is giving up the pretense of objectivity, slanting hard left, raising their price and having Stephen Colbert as a guest editor (because who can tell between clown and editor in the media in this age.) Others are following suit and everyone is racing to the bottom of being bankrupt first. Profits don't matter when you have the right intentions about

Speaking of bankrupt the United States is and even the president admits we've run out of money even though we own the printing presses. The same financial pages that whisper about what everyone knows 8-12 months before it becomes the statistics reveal the news are all whispering the same thing. The debt path Obama has put us on is unsustainable and we need a dollar replacement because the U.S. is going to default on its debt with the printing press. Everyone knows it and all are standing around knowing the ship is sinking but not sure of how to bolt to the lifeboats without creating a mad mob.

Don't worry though. HuffPo will point out who Chris Matthews "blasted" today and also who John Stewart "slammed" because the tone and intention are much more important than the facts and details. Just ask our newest Supreme Court nominee about that. In the end Obama will go "talk" to everyone about the fact that we make nothing, borrow everything and how utopia should come about because we want it to happen.

Who would invest in a country that cannot honor debts, rule or law or have news organizations that cannot report the news? It is clearly a country that prefers delusions to reality. No one should invest in that unless they want to lose their return as many are already doing.

Me, I'm working on my garden and making sure my my rentals are filled with good people, enjoying the outdoors and of course my kids. Even in Future United States, or California as we prefer to call it, I'm doing just fine. Good principles work even in the down times. I am a bit sad that the country my kids grow up in though will be a shell of what it could be and that so much harm will come to it due to delusional ideas.

Not really, it becomes more like, let us try to earn profits with leverage instead of making things and we will let you steal some of it to redistribute to various groups.

The profits, justified or not are gone but the theft is still occuring.


I'd call it more than both parties, I'd call it the belief system of an entire generation.

Here is something that is pretty pathetic and annoying because no media source is likely to report on it today.





Pretty words only sucker people for so long.

I can see why you enjoy laughing so much. I mean your party leader is a comedian and his sidekick.

Let's look at the HuffPo today for some encapsulated Democratic thought.

Stewart Calls Fox News Personalities "Extremists" For Coverage Of Obama's Cairo Speech

Clearly this must be a joke since it is from a comedian.

WATCH Dick Uncut: "Daily Show" Calls Out Cheney For Blaming 9/11 On Richard Clarke

Clearly this is news because... wait that is from a comedian as well.

ComedyWATCH: Stephen Colbert Lands In Iraq!

Ah...well perhaps this is why the press has no time to ponder Obama policy. Colbert is landing! I wonder if CNN interrupted regular news coverage to report on it?

I'd go on but the amount of nonsense on the page makes me a bit sick to my stomach. HuffPo... the only news website on the web still talking about Octomom.

Someday could be pretty darn soon if the impatient American public note than Obama didn't end the war he promised to end, spent trillions and still will likely have double digit unemployment going into the midterm elections.

See those of us with memories can use them to recall that when Obama was arguing for the stimulus to be passed and save all those wonderful jobs, it was to limit. His argument was that without the stimulus, the unemployment rate would reach an incredibly high 9%.

He got his stimulus and today it sits at 9.1%.

Keep laughing though... keep laughing.

Obama declared that with the stimulus, unemployment would be down to 7% by the midterms. Let's see if it happens. If it hits double digits instead get read for the fun.

Oops... someone at Newsweek had that honest slip of the tongue again.



David Adickes works on his sculpture of President Barack Obama at his studio in Houston, June 2, 2009. AP Photo/David J. Phillip

The Democrats have become religious nutcases. Only instead of praying to an invisible guy in the sky, they've got a man handing out checks for trillions. Sadly even with all that spending, they aren't getting their miracle.

Here's some honesty. Under Obama, rule of law is a volleyball to be tossed around only we aren't talking about terrorists in a detention camp and a debate about that, we are talking about Americans shareholders, investors, and state governments getting screwed over because Obama demands that a secured bond become unsecured to pay off his political bribes for the UAW.

Here's some honesty. AIG's bailout has cost double what was spent on Katrina.

Here's some more honesty. All the Obama financial projects for the economy this year have been radically wrong.

Meanwhile the guy hasn't been in town very often because he is out apologizing to the world for America existing.

State of Indiana objected in court based off the shortchanging of bondholders of which they were one.

Teachers, police officers and fire fighters are those terrible "speculators" who loaned out money by buying those bonds.


Correlates to the failure to understand that Obama's every day business costs double the most expensive claimed Bush fuck ups.

The knock on Bush during Katrina was that it cost so much that it even cost more than going to war in Iraq for a couple years.

To make it clear let me put it this way. The cost of the entire war in Iraq is still $130 billion less than the cost of the stimulus.

So every bit of claimed financial loss blaimed on Bush for 8 years has been exceeded by Obama in one.


We were told those feelings caused lack of action. Obama claims to have changed the feelings yet there is no change in action. There is a word for that. It is called bullshit.

The problems with the economy are much more than perception. The government keeps becoming the answer to itself as the problem and declares it must reallocate the resources it caused to be misallocated with bad policy. It is becoming a negative feedback loop and the result is amplifying which is why the numbers are getting huge so quickly.

That said the media is becoming ridiculous in their desire to bail out Obama.

I kid you not, according to the L.A. Times, unemployment has now official become "Funemployment."

Anyone else feel like vomiting on their shoes at the sheer audacity of the media to spin reality for their messiah?

No problem. I'm sure you'll be able to find a comparable "funemployment" type article from the time Bush was in office, of from a time when any Republican was holding the leadership position. Just go ahead and post it when you find it.

It's sort of like how gas prices have doubled since inauguration and when Bush was in office they only ever moved up because he was a greedy oil man helping his friends. Now of course they have doubled because... oh look, we don't need to look into oil jumping to $70 a barrel, we need to ask how Sasha and Malia like Paris.

I'll be happy to look at whatever news pieces you find examining the movement of oil and tying it to Obama action as well.

Not quite sure how Spitzer = funemployment but um...whatever.

Ah, well in the meantime I'll be waiting for that "funemployment" article about how healthy it was for Republican leaders to put people out of work.

In the meantime we have some polls and they show some interesting trends.

June 2009


June 2008


Republicans have gone from having advantages on ZERO out of ten issues to six out of ten.

The economy has been a 20 point swing and that wonderful Ethics and Corruption, 19 points toward the GOP.

Things are changing fast. I think Obama's popularity might really end up hurting the Democrats because, as we've even seen in the reasoning here, it masks and covers many deeper issues. People whether it be fear of having an -ism leveled at them or just a divergence of issues from person, it is clear that there are plenty of areas where they have disagreement with the president on issues even if they don't attach it to him personally yet.