Best suited machine for FCP (iMac or MacBook Pro)

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
Hello,



I'm planning to replace my "old Maggi"... what!? I'm the only one around here who name his computer? ... anyway, as I was saying, I'm planning to replace my old G5 desktop dual 2.0Ghz for a new machine.



I would love to put my hands on a brand new Mac Pro but the price is too much for my current budget so I was thinking in a more "wallet friendly" option.



I need a machine powerful enough so it can handle pretty intensive work with Final Cut Pro and 3D (mainly Blender but also a bit of Cinema 4D). This is where I need some advice.



As I said before, I cannot afford a Mac Pro, so I was thinking that my best option relies between an iMac and a MacBook Pro.



Portability is not an issue, I'm more concern about "raw power". Of course I can get an idea just by reading each machine's specs, but there must be "small details" that make the difference. Plus a quote of "users' experience" that I would like to hear so I can make a "well informed purchase".



I'll really appreciate any advice.



P.S. That's right, MAGI... as in NEON GENESIS EVANGELION... I know, I'm a nerd

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 5
    backtomacbacktomac Posts: 4,579member
    I don't use FCP or Blender, but its pretty well accepted that any of the new iMacs will be faster than a MBP. The 27" iMacs with the quad core cpus will be substantially faster than the fastest MBP you can get. You need to see one and ensure that you can live with the large glossy display which some users cannot tolerate.



    A good value IMO, are the last generation refurbished quad core iMacs. Those will be only be slightly slower than the new ones that replaced them but quite a bit cheaper.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 5
    iMac. Quad.



    Bigger screen is worth it for picture and video editing.

    Better GPU ... again... these apps will leverage the GPU for additional power.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 5
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by KingOfSomewhereHot View Post


    iMac. Quad.



    Bigger screen is worth it for picture and video editing.

    Better GPU ... again... these apps will leverage the GPU for additional power.



    I've been looking around, and it seems that the new iMac is a real "workhorse", specially the one with i7 processors. I think I'll wait a couple of more weeks until the "summer sale season" (I live in Japan) and go for the iMac.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 5
    cory bauercory bauer Posts: 1,286member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by gcarcass View Post


    Portability is not an issue, I'm more concern about "raw power".



    You just answered your own question

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by gcarcass View Post


    Of course I can get an idea just by reading each machine's specs, but there must be "small details" that make the difference. Plus a quote of "users' experience" that I would like to hear so I can make a "well informed purchase".



    There really isn't; the specs speak for themselves. The iMacs will run circles around the MacBook Pros and for significantly less money. My experience with Final Cut Pro on MacBook Pro's has been far less than favorable, even after replacing the 5400RPM drive with a 7200RPM drive. Enjoy your new iMac!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 5
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Cory Bauer View Post


    You just answered your own question



    There really isn't; the specs speak for themselves. The iMacs will run circles around the MacBook Pros and for significantly less money. My experience with Final Cut Pro on MacBook Pro's has been far less than favorable, even after replacing the 5400RPM drive with a 7200RPM drive. Enjoy your new iMac!



    What Cory said!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.