1

Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014




[ 01-28-2003: Message edited by: Steve ]</p>

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 16
    groveratgroverat Posts: 10,872member
    "Verses"? Is it a poetry fight?
  • Reply 2 of 16
    stevesteve Posts: 523member




    [ 01-28-2003: Message edited by: Steve ]</p>
  • Reply 3 of 16
    jeffyboyjeffyboy Posts: 1,055member
    Not sure this is a good idea...



    Jeff
  • Reply 3 of 16
    eugeneeugene Posts: 8,254member
    If they both had cigarette lighters, I'd go with the one on the right since the other looks like she's got a lot of product in her hair.
  • Reply 5 of 16
    sapisapi Posts: 207member
    the one in the blue shirt...
  • Reply 6 of 16
    sapisapi Posts: 207member
    now... try to figure out what I was talking about...



    (damn people who edit their posts while I reply)
  • Reply 7 of 16
    jeffyboyjeffyboy Posts: 1,055member
    <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" />



    This is gonna seem so strange to the random person looking at the thread tomorrow!



    Jeff
  • Reply 8 of 16
    stevesteve Posts: 523member
    [quote]Originally posted by sapi:

    <strong>(damn people who edit their posts while I reply)</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Only because this man







    looked like he could kick my ass if he really wanted to. I mean, it'd take him a while to come all the way from New Mexico, but look! My location is right to the left of this text! What is stopping him!.......s
  • Reply 9 of 16
    eugeneeugene Posts: 8,254member
    I am so confused.
  • Reply 10 of 16
    I find your wholehearted endorsement of United States unilateralism as manifested by your numerical propaganda entirely at odds with modern world standards of decency, human rights and best environmental practices. You use your faux liberal media to foist the notion of supremecy and hegemony onto all those who do not bow before your war machine and bankrupt cultural imperialism. The obvious allusion to the U2 song by the same name, 1, and the resulting implication that your use of a military spy plane by the same name to immorally monitor other sovereign nations is all too confrontational and blunt and yet you proceed anyway. To compound your numerous other recent slaps in the face to the world community you directly attack the Arabic people of the Middle East by usurping their numerals for your disinformation machine's manipulative use of 1. Additionally, you further contradict your own constitution's establishment clause by attempting to reinforce the notion of monotheism via its strongest symbol, 1. You American cultural imperialists would do well to heed the clarion call for multilateral action as expressed by countercultere artists and philosophers. Indeed, I believe it was Socrates, or perhaps Three Dog Night that distilled it so succinctly when they said, "One is the loneliest number...that you'll ever do. Two, can be as bad as one, it is the loneliest number since the number one." The second line of course can be seen as a Nostradamus like denunciation of Tony Blair's being made into W's bitch, making the former British empire into a lapdog for our favorite cowboy. Woo be onto those who worship 1.



    [ 01-28-2003: Message edited by: ColanderOfDeath ]</p>
  • Reply 11 of 16
    jkarc21jkarc21 Posts: 132member
    [quote]Originally posted by ColanderOfDeath:

    <strong>I find your wholehearted endorsement of United States unilateralism as manifested by your numerical propaganda entirely at odds with modern world standards of decency, human rights and best environmental practices. You use your faux liberal media to foist the notion of supremecy and hegemony onto all those who do not bow before your war machine and bankrupt cultural imperialism. The obvious allusion to the U2 song by the same name, 1, and the resulting implication that your use of a military spy plane by the same name to immorally monitor other sovereign nations is all too confrontational and blunt and yet you proceed anyway. To compound your numerous other recent slaps in the face to the world community you directly attack the Arabic people of the Middle East by usurping their numerals for your disinformation machine's manipulative use of 1. Additionally, you further contradict your own constitution's establishment clause by attempting to reinforce the notion of monotheism via its strongest symbol, 1. You American cultural imperialists would do well to heed the clarion call for multilateral action as expressed by countercultere artists and philosophers. Indeed, I believe it was Socrates, or perhaps Three Dog Night that distilled it so succinctly when they said, "One is the loneliest number...that you'll ever do. Two, can be as bad as one, it is the loneliest number since the number one." The second line of course can be seen as a Nostradamus like denunciation of Tony Blair's being made into W's bitch, making the former British empire into a lapdog for our favorite cowboy. Woo be onto those who worship 1.



    [ 01-28-2003: Message edited by: ColanderOfDeath ]</strong><hr></blockquote>



    was this message created using the auto rant program?



    It sure sounds like it. You can have a lot of fun with that thing....
  • Reply 12 of 16
    jkarc21jkarc21 Posts: 132member
    [quote]Originally posted by jeffyboy:

    <strong> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" />



    This is gonna seem so strange to the random person looking at the thread tomorrow!



    Jeff</strong><hr></blockquote>



    yep! this must be the oddest thread I have ever read. Why have the first messages been edited and deleted?
  • Reply 13 of 16
    No no auto-rant, just my own ramblings since the topic was already edited out and thus left to be filled in by the time I read the thread. Although the same type of over the top verbosity works well for my purposes as it does for that program. I doubt that you would find either the word bitch or such specific modern cultural references in that auto-rant thing although I could be wrong.
  • Reply 14 of 16
    thegeldingthegelding Posts: 3,230member
    i won't tell why he edited the orginal message...but i will say it was nice of him to do that and i appreciate it and i am glad that i don't have to travel to Mass. in the winter to kick his ass.... g
  • Reply 15 of 16
    Steve!



    Back into your cage.
  • Reply 16 of 16
Sign In or Register to comment.