The iCloud effect
I'm preparing a few upgrades in the near future. I'm hoping to get a Macbook Air, iPad 2 and iPhone 5 all within a few months of each other.
The magic that I hope ties them all together well is iCloud. I'm a content MobileMe user right now. I probably don't lean on the service as much as I could but it works for me.
iCloud, to my eyes, represents that next leap forward. I sold my first generation iPad a few months ago and I miss it. What I don't miss, however, is the management of non Universal apps in the app store. I remember thinking that if MobileMe could sync an app then the Universal version would be ideal because then it "connects" my iPhone with the iPad and makes for or more powerful system. A las MobileMe was not up to the task but it appears that iCloud is and here are my hopes for iCloud.
1. Pervasive support. If an app is available on the app store and that app deals with data or documents that can be sent. I want iCloud.
2. I want developers to skew towards Universal apps even if the pricing needs to be higher rather than deliver separate iPhone and iPad apps.
3. When possible I'd like to see a Mac app even if it's basic. At times I don't need a full fledged Mac app but rather something that's going to let me get data in or read data later on a larger screen. I'm starting to prune task apps that are iPhone/iPad only. Mobile devices are great but they become even greater with Web/Desktop OS access.
Lion and iOS 5 are big big big. I'm sure developers are going to ante up on iCloud and other stuff but I hope they leverage these tools and realize that it's ok to ask for money. The only way someone can show you they care about your product is to pay a fair price.
The magic that I hope ties them all together well is iCloud. I'm a content MobileMe user right now. I probably don't lean on the service as much as I could but it works for me.
iCloud, to my eyes, represents that next leap forward. I sold my first generation iPad a few months ago and I miss it. What I don't miss, however, is the management of non Universal apps in the app store. I remember thinking that if MobileMe could sync an app then the Universal version would be ideal because then it "connects" my iPhone with the iPad and makes for or more powerful system. A las MobileMe was not up to the task but it appears that iCloud is and here are my hopes for iCloud.
1. Pervasive support. If an app is available on the app store and that app deals with data or documents that can be sent. I want iCloud.
2. I want developers to skew towards Universal apps even if the pricing needs to be higher rather than deliver separate iPhone and iPad apps.
3. When possible I'd like to see a Mac app even if it's basic. At times I don't need a full fledged Mac app but rather something that's going to let me get data in or read data later on a larger screen. I'm starting to prune task apps that are iPhone/iPad only. Mobile devices are great but they become even greater with Web/Desktop OS access.
Lion and iOS 5 are big big big. I'm sure developers are going to ante up on iCloud and other stuff but I hope they leverage these tools and realize that it's ok to ask for money. The only way someone can show you they care about your product is to pay a fair price.
Comments
The only way someone can show you they care about your product is to pay a fair price.
No. The only way someone can show you they care about your product is by actually using it.
Not everybody can afford a price. And what constitutes a 'fair' price is very debatable.
No. The only way someone can show you they care about your product is by actually using it.
Not everybody can afford a price. And what constitutes a 'fair' price is very debatable.
People use free stuff all the time. Doesn't actually mean they care about the company or the product. It's why Apple doesn't play in the low margin commodity business. They know that at that level people's allegiance is to cost and Apple strives to be more than a price tag.
Take for instance the Omnigroup. They don't give their software away by any stretch but the software they deliver is updated regularly and has a plethora of features. They've drawn a line in the sand and said "You will pay more for our software but it will work as designed and be functional"
They've done all of this being devoted to a single platform as well.
Apple's giving developers the tools but they have to believe in their product and it's value and leverage the platform as much as possible.
People use free stuff all the time. Doesn't actually mean they care about the company or the product.
Using 'free stuff' doesn't mean they care about the company (the company can take care of itself), but it DOES mean they care about the product! Or they wouldn't be using it.
For most of the organizations the thing matters is the quality, if the price is a bit high but the software is really functional then the price really doesn't matters.
Price always matters! Neither "organizations" nor individuals can afford to waste money. Not even Bill Gates or Steve Jobs. They only became so rich because they did not piss their money away on stuff that wasn't worth the price.
Oh yes Apple products are really not affordable, they are too costly to buy. They should decrease their products cost price so that an ordinary man can think to buy it.
Good. We don't want worthless spambots buying Macs, anyway.