G4 iBooks...
Now that the iBook is the lone G3-based Mac in Apple's lineup, how long - and be serious and realistic, please - do you think it'll be before the iBook gets a G4?
Summer? Fall? Next winter? MWSF 2003? Never?
What practical (engineering and production) issues might be at play, preventing this? Heating? Ventilation? Power consumption?
Or is it more from a marketing/economic stance? Affordability and recognizing that perhaps a G3 is perfectly fine for the iBook's intended target audience?
I know, lots of questions...
Summer? Fall? Next winter? MWSF 2003? Never?
What practical (engineering and production) issues might be at play, preventing this? Heating? Ventilation? Power consumption?
Or is it more from a marketing/economic stance? Affordability and recognizing that perhaps a G3 is perfectly fine for the iBook's intended target audience?
I know, lots of questions...
Comments
When the G5 IS announced, it'll be just desktop towers, right?
So what would it matter than if the TiBook is still a G4?
Just perception and marketing then? I don't know...I'm asking.
Then again is any part of the perceived "slowness" of the ibook G3 with OSX due to the fact that it has to run OSX and OS9 at the same time??? Would 1+Ghz help??
Too many questions no answers.
So hypothetically:
TiBook has 733 to 867 MHz HiP 7 G4. If Apple wants to further separate the products, they can add L3 cache or DDR SDRAM.
iBook has 700 MHz HiP 6 SOI G4 on 100 MHz bus.
A 700 mhz G4 iBook with a 100 bus would fit the bill.
I don't imagine the new Powerbook to have a G5 anytime soon. So it goes up to a 867 and 933 Mhz G4 processor, better video card, increased screen resolution, built in airport, and a 133 bus.
From a marketing point of view, I think there would be enough of a performance/features difference between the two.
I think it's WAY more important that the iBook is fitted with a G4 (OS X, iTunes, overall performance, iMovie, etc.) than it is to sit and wait for the PowerBook to get a G5.
They can do lots of things to differentiate the two (just as they've done with the LCD iMac and the Quicksilver towers...both G4's, but both quite different in specs/performance).
A nice, iMac-matching iBook in the 700MHz G4 range (give or take), with a 100MHz bus, combo drive, 30-40GB hard drive, etc. would be wonderful, especially if they apply Satchmo's ideas to the TiBook to further separate the two.
I hope it's soon.
I have a buddy who I'd LOVE to see get a 14" G4 iBook with a Combo Drive. She'd be set!
The current iBook will be one year old in May and, while not expecting or even WANTING a massive redesign, I'm confident that somehow Apple can figure out a way to outfit the current iBook case design with a G4.
I'm going on record and am betting that a G4 iBook will be one of the announcements during Job's MWNY 2002 keynote.
If OS X is the end-all/be-all OS (according to Apple and their marketing stance), it would help if their lineup all had a processor that could comfortably run it and take advantage of all it's features in a way that isn't too slow and painful.
You'll turn more people off to the platform if their first impression is that the hardware AND the OS are both sluggish and less than zippy.
<strong>Now that I think about it, I don't think MWNY would be too unreasonable to expect a G4 iBook announcement.</strong><hr></blockquote>
As I've recently acquired an iBook 600mhz G3 combo, a major hardware upgrade within the next few months would be consistant with all of my other Apple purchasing experiences...
<strong>They can do lots of things to differentiate the two... </strong><hr></blockquote>
One further differentiation is that the 14" iBook is also heavier and bulkier (although, some actually prefer this).
Plus the iBook only has mirroring capabilities vs. spanning on the Powerbook.
Although I hope any new iBook would have the ability to span.
[QBHowever, even if the iBook had a G4, people would want the PowerBook for its larger screen, better video, GigE, etc.[/QB]<hr></blockquote>
Some, maybe. But not if you're a student, on a budget, only need it for surfing/e-mail, etc.
Not every Mac user is a power-hungry graphics person.
The iBook, in lots of ways, is much more attractive to many people. Especially if there is a gap of $1000 to reach those features you mention.
I must say I'm a bit disappointed in Apple with their attitude towards the portables-- it just seems that reving the iBook to 600 & 700 and the TiBook to 667 & 800 is such an obvious next step... I hope they don't wait for MWNY to do it.
TING5
From apple's history, i suspect that they enjoy touting their updated consumer machines as on par with the power of their Pro machines, only to update their pro machines shortly thereafter.
my guess: Faster G4 powerbooks. Faster G3 ibooks. ibook goes G4. Powerbooks get faster G4s. Powermac goes G5. Faster G4 ibooks. Powerbook goes G5.
(i am not even going to attempt a time table for these events.. but i see Powerbook G5 in late 2003 early 2004)
I'm thinking Sahara G3, with all its cheaper, faster, smaller, cooler technology, starting within a couple months at 700 Mhz and going up to 1Ghz within a year or so.
Reason being, is that it will really fill the need of the sub-notebook category with out developing a whole new laptop. While at 4.9 pounds is not lightweight, it's small size and features more than make up for it's weight.
How sweet a 12" G4/700 Combo drive iBook would be!
I dont really think the iBook will go G4 until even a PBG5 is released, or until the PBG4 clock speed gets a lot higher. It all depends on the chips though.
I'm thinking Sahara G3, with all its cheaper, faster, smaller, cooler technology, starting within a couple months at 700 Mhz and going up to 1Ghz within a year or so. <hr></blockquote>
IBM already has 1.5 GHz G3s :eek:
<a href="http://www.geek.com/procspec/apple/g3e.htm" target="_blank">http://www.geek.com/procspec/apple/g3e.htm</a>
supposedly it was ready a year ago!
[ 04-07-2002: Message edited by: bauman ]</p>
The G3 will keep the costs down for target audience like schools, while the G4 could provide the performance necessary for those needing more "oomph."
The 14" already has the bigger screen and better battery-- why not a G4?
This has good marketing implications to me. But then, what do I know?