MacWhispers Now "Confirms" New iPods

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in iPod + iTunes + AppleTV edited January 2014
After initally saying they would have aluminum backs instead of stainless steel, they now say the upcoming models will stay as they are currently. I would suspect lower prices and, of course, the fabled 40 Gig. Maybe MPEG 4?
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 22
    hmurchisonhmurchison Posts: 12,464member
    I'm expecting no less than



    1. 40GB Maximum



    2. Bluetooth.



    3. FW800



    4. MPEG4 Support



    5. Digital Output SPDIF
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 22
    bungebunge Posts: 7,329member
    If the drives can't handle the speeds of FW400, what if anything does FW800 have to offer?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 22
    hmurchisonhmurchison Posts: 12,464member
    [quote]Originally posted by bunge:

    <strong>If the drives can't handle the speeds of FW400, what if anything does FW800 have to offer?</strong><hr></blockquote>



    1. Apple will quickly migrate all devices to FW800 because there really is no cost penalty.



    2. FW800 can utilize different cable types but more importantly in the case of the iPod it handles device Abitration much more efficiently which will be a boon if the future offers Plugging your iPod into the home Rendezvous Network.



    As of now I will not purchase a device that doesn't support FW800. It's clear that Apple will revamp the whole lineup as quickly as possible. I too thought initially that it was overkill but now when there isn't much of a price hit coupled with what the future brings for Home Networks.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 22
    stunnedstunned Posts: 1,096member
    Sigh. I was hoping for a all white casing.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 22
    C'mon Bluetooth!!!



    While I look forward to mp4 support the thought of re-ripping over 5000 songs again makes me shudder...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 22
    amorphamorph Posts: 7,112member
    I believe FW800 is also cheaper than FW400, which is a reason to implement it even if the device has no need for the added bandwidth.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 22
    i hope they have the sense to add in pitch control

    it would make for a killer music tool
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 22
    cosmonutcosmonut Posts: 4,872member
    [quote]Originally posted by hmurchison:

    <strong>

    5. Digital Output SPDIF</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Why would an iPod need this? Why do you think they'd build it in?...or is it just a request?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 22
    joekjoek Posts: 93member
    [quote]Originally posted by MacsRGood4U:

    <strong>After initally saying they would have aluminum backs instead of stainless steel, they now say the upcoming models will stay as they are currently. I would suspect lower prices and, of course, the fabled 40 Gig. Maybe MPEG 4?</strong><hr></blockquote>





    So they make up a rumor about something happening... and then "Confirm" that nothing will change...



    think about that...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 22
    [quote]Originally posted by hmurchison:

    <strong>I'm expecting no less than



    2. Bluetooth.

    </strong><hr></blockquote>



    Um, correct me if I'm wrong, but what good is a slow (720 kbps) wireless connection on an mp3 player?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 22
    There won't be bluetooth, as it's pointless, too slow to do anything at all; there won't be fw800 as it's not needed and would add to the cost; and there won't be spdif, you copy music to ipods via fw, it pays for apple to keep it that way and they won't put spdif on as an output as it allows perfect copies - against drm policies.



    But there will be a 40, just not shipping until late april and they will be prettier.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 22
    paulpaul Posts: 5,278member
    [quote]Originally posted by agent302:

    <strong>



    Um, correct me if I'm wrong, but what good is a slow (720 kbps) wireless connection on an mp3 player?</strong><hr></blockquote>



    it would be nice to be able to sync the calendars and contacts via Bluetooth



    also gives possibility to share contact information with friends on the road



    also... BLUETOOTH KEYBOARD to allow input into the iPod...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 22
    hmurchisonhmurchison Posts: 12,464member
    [quote]Originally posted by Chopper3:

    <strong>There won't be bluetooth, as it's pointless, too slow to do anything at all; there won't be fw800 as it's not needed and would add to the cost; and there won't be spdif, you copy music to ipods via fw, it pays for apple to keep it that way and they won't put spdif on as an output as it allows perfect copies - against drm policies.



    But there will be a 40, just not shipping until late april and they will be prettier.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    WTF kind of logic are you using here? I would agree the Bluetooth probably won't be added but then again I have my doubts that Bluetooth is a technoology that will significantly change the way I use my computers. However you're dead wrong on FW800. It's not going to be more expensive than FW400 enough warrant leaving it off. Apple doesn't have DRM policies other than you can't add music from another library. SPDIF doesn't violate and "perfect copies" of mp3's sound funny as mp3's are a lossy compressed format.



    I "know" FW800 will be on the next iPod I'd put money on it.



    Bluetooh is a longshot but the iPod can sync Addressbook data so who knows?



    Spdif is a very longshot but it would be cool nontheless for easy hookup to existing Home Theater receivers.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 22
    So, if we were to have FW800 added onto each iPod, would that still allow for the 99% of us that only have FW400 to sync our iPods to our computers? Or will it be a FW400/800 type either/or setup?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 22
    [quote]Originally posted by Bioflavonoid:

    <strong>So, if we were to have FW800 added onto each iPod, would that still allow for the 99% of us that only have FW400 to sync our iPods to our computers? Or will it be a FW400/800 type either/or setup?</strong><hr></blockquote>



    short answer: yes



    longer explanation from a superb article on <a href="http://www.envestco2.com/macwhispers/0000019.html"; target="_blank">macwhispers</a>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 22
    [quote]Originally posted by hmurchison:

    <strong>I'm expecting no less than



    1. 40GB Maximum



    2. Bluetooth.



    3. FW800



    4. MPEG4 Support



    5. Digital Output SPDIF</strong><hr></blockquote>

    What about the miracle maker software?



     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 22
    I'm trying to figure out why I'd need 40GB.



    I just added about a dozen CDs to my iTunes collection. For me personally, I'm still less than 4GB!



    Now, if the rumors of a vPod (iPod + pictures and video) are true. Larger, color screen; sync w/iPhoto...then the space makes a bit more sense. But even then, My wife (who is the photog in the family) only has like 2GB of photos + 3-4GB of music. Still WAY below the 20GB drive out there.



    Just playing devil's advocate. I'd rather the $ went into a color display and iPhoto synch. That would round out the iPod nicely.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 22
    I could see a 40Gig iPod



    I dod think there will be a firmware update to run MPEG4
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 19 of 22
    For me a 40 GB iPod makes sense... I have about 20 GBs worth of music, and it would be cool to carry HUGE movies and files on my iPod. It would be cool to show iMovies off of my iPod through the TV as well... Remember, 40 GBs may not be completely necessary, but that doesn't make it bad.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 20 of 22
    dfilerdfiler Posts: 3,420member
    With digital out I might actually consider an iPod. I rip everything at nearly 300 VBR so 40 GB would also be great. Audiophiles have tried to resist the cheap and dirty lure of mp3s With digital out and massive storage, I would be able to get decent compressed audio into my home theater...



    Although, I'm still holding out for a wifi component for this purpose.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.