Review: Microsoft's health tracking, iOS-compatible Band

Posted:
in iPhone edited February 2015
The competitive price, strong feature set, and universal compatibility of the Microsoft Band will make it a compelling product for anyone in the market for a wearable fitness and health tracking device, though it does suffer from some of the expected shortcomings of a first-generation product.




We've spent a few weeks testing out the Microsoft Band, which is compatible with Apple's iOS and also has a dedicated OS X app for syncing. The Band sells for $199.99 through Microsoft, and it is available in sizes of small, medium and large.

Microsoft Band is compatible with Apple's iOS, via a dedicated Microsoft Health app available free on the App Store. The company also has a less-fully-featured app for OS X, available on the Mac App Store, that allows users to charge and sync.

Hardware

While it offers a range of basic smartwatch functions, the Microsoft Band is first and foremost a fitness and health tracking device, offering step tracking, heart rate monitoring, sleep monitoring and more. But for us, the key feature was GPS integration, allowing the Band to track our outdoor runs without the need to use our iPhone's GPS, or even carry our iPhone with us.




The design of the Band is very much a first-generation device: It's chunky and feels like a work in progress. But the Band is bulky for a reason, as it packs in a great deal of sensors and capabilities that do make it an appealing health device.

The top of the device sports a 1.4-inch touchscreen that measures 11 millimeters by 33 millimeters, with a resolution of 320 by 106 pixels. Given its long rectangular design, content must be displayed horizontally across the display, which makes it best suited for displaying inside the wrist.




We don't usually wear watches in this fashion, but found ourselves able to quickly adjust.

Wearing the Band is not necessarily unpleasant, but we did find it to be slightly uncomfortable at times. Thankfully, adjusting the tightness of the Band is easy with a unique slide-locking clasp on the underside.

Inside the wrist-worn accessory is a sensor that can actively track a user's heart rate throughout the day. And opposite that, underneath the display, is a magnetic charging port. When worn for a long period of time at moderate tightness, we did find that this port would leave an indentation on the skin on the inside of our wrist.




Beyond heart rate, the Band can also track steps and movement, skin temperature, ultraviolet light, and more. Including all of these sensors makes the Band rather stiff, which some wearers may find unappealing.

We'll also note that the Band was advertised to come with a free screen protector, but when we bought ours at a Microsoft Store, no protectors were available. Over the course of a few weeks' worth of use, we did manage to get some noticeable scratches on the display.

The design of the Microsoft Band is frankly its least appealing aspect. Users who don't mind its style or comfort level on the wrist will find its greatest assets in daily usage, where we found the Band to be a viable entrance into the wearables market.


Usage

The Microsoft Band is not intended to be a do-everything smartwatch, and this device doesn't feel positioned to compete with the Apple Watch or even Android Wear hardware. Instead, Microsoft is focusing on the fitness market, where companies like Nike, Garmin, Fitbit, Jawbone and others compete.

The collection of features and sensors in the Band help it stand out from other devices, which may only track steps or heart rate. The Band not only does both, but also offers built-in GPS, calorie tracking, sleep tracking, goal setting, a UV monitor, and a unique selection of guided workouts that we found particularly interesting.




Navigating the Microsoft Health app for iOS, users can install custom workouts and routines onto their Band.

For example, a basic routine might have a user working out three times a week. Once this routine has been selected, the Band would alert users on days when they must work out, whether it's strength training or cardio.

For these workouts, the Band will even walk users through every step of their routine, using a combination of display and buzzing alerts. For example, a bodyweight workout routine would have users to jumping jacks, squats, planks and crunches, and alert then with a buzz when to start and stop.

For more advanced fitness enthusiasts, guided workouts from Gold's Gym are available. The Gold's Gym workouts are 12-week plans created by celebrity trainers, focusing on a variety of goals from building muscle to losing weight.




And the inclusion of GPS is a true killer feature for the Microsoft Band. Testing the Band inspired us to dig up our old clip-on sixth-generation iPod nano, using that for music on our runs and negating the need to lug around an iPhone 6 on our arm.

Once returning from our run, we simply opened the Microsoft Health app on iOS and synced the activity, which was then automatically uploaded to our connected RunKeeper account. The Band shares time, pace and distance data with RunKeeper, but unfortunately not route data on a map.

GPS does come at a cost, though: While Microsoft says the Band can last up to two days on a single charge, we found that battery life was significantly reduced if we tapped into the GPS. For example, in our tests, a one-hour outdoor run cut the battery uptime to just over a day.




Currently, the Band also supports integration with MyFitnessPal, and Microsoft has partnered with Starbucks to allow users to pay with their coffee chain card via a scannable display on the Band's display.

One gripe we would like to see fixed: Some sort of auto-enable for the display when bringing the watch toward your face, like Apple's upcoming Watch. As it stands, activating the screen to simply check the time requires a button press.

Still, the Microsoft Band has a strong lineup of features for an ambitious first-generation device, and it's clear that there's much more to come -- particularly on the iOS front.


iOS compatibility

While the Band does not yet work with HealthKit, Microsoft has told AppleInsider that it does plan to integrate support for Apple's Health application in iOS 8. This will make it even easier for data collected by the Band to be shared with other apps and services, which will serve to only bolster the value of the wearable device.

For now, without HealthKit support, Microsoft's integration with RunKeeper and MyFitnessPal go a long way in making this a viable fitness tracking device. But we are looking forward to more universal ecosystem support once HealthKit begins to really take off.




Syncing, setting up workouts, and customizing the look of the Band through the iOS app are all simple and easy. For the smartwatch functions, major apps like Messages and Facebook get dedicated tiles that can be enabled or disabled, while users who want all notifications from all apps sent to their wrist can allow the Band to do so.

Applications are displayed on the Band as tiles, with three at a time fitting across the display. Users can customize the order of these tiles, or hide them completely. The color scheme and wallpaper of the Band can also be configured through the iOS app.




The Microsoft Health app also allows users to review their recent activities, including runs, exercises, and sleep patterns. These are accompanied by helpful data and well-designed graphics, including maps for runs, and illustrations for restful sleep, light sleep, and time awake.

Microsoft Health feels comprehensive, detailed and useful. The tracking capabilities of the Band and the out-of-the-box support for Apple's iOS make the Band a strong candidate for anyone considering a fitness-focused device.




As an iOS-connected smartwatch, the Microsoft Band falls flat, offering just basic alerts and vibrations. The unit also includes a microphone, but this only works with Windows Phone devices and is incompatible with iOS.

Conclusion

Priced competitively at $200, the Microsoft Band is clearly not trying to go after the same market as the Apple Watch, or even Android Wear. This is intended as a fitness and health device, and it's very much first-generation hardware, with a clunky design that may not appeal to all.




In the space it occupies, competing with products from Jawbone, Fitbit, Basis, Nike and others, the Microsoft Band offers enough to stand out. Anyone currently in the market for a wearable fitness tracker should definitely consider Microsoft's offering.

In many ways, Microsoft Health feels like the star of the show, tapping into the hardware features of the Band to offer a wide range of health and fitness data. This, along with the deep day-one compatibility with iOS, only bodes well for the Band and future wearable fitness accessories from Microsoft.




Of course, those looking for a more full-featured smartwatch should wait. Regardless of how well received the Apple Watch is when it launches in 2015, few could dispute the likelihood that the wearable devices market is about to get shaken up in a big way.

But a $350-and-up multifunctional wearable device isn't for everyone, and that's where the Microsoft Band carves its niche. As a first-generation product, it's a respectable entrance into the wearable market that seems to signal even better things to come.

Score: 3.5 out of 5

Pros:
  • A wide array of advanced sensors packed into a competitively priced wrist-worn device
  • Integrated GPS is a significant for running, biking and other outdoor activities
  • Strong iOS integration with syncing, informative health data readouts, and basic smartwatch notifications
  • Support for HealthKit is on the way, with RunKeeper and MyFitnessPal already compatible
Cons:
  • Clunky design could be improved to be more comfortable and durable
  • Just a day and a half of battery life -- even less if you use GPS
  • Inside-the-wrist design may not appeal to everyone

Where to buy

The Microsoft Band is available direct from Microsoft from its online store and its retail locations. All three sizes sell for $199.99. It comes with a $5 Starbucks gift card and is supposed to come with a screen protector (though ours did not).

«1345

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 90
    MacProMacPro Posts: 17,779member
    I'd like to see some reviews of such products testing more varied life styles. For example, what would the readings be like watching Dexter as opposed to watching Dr. Who? Is one more beneficial than the other. Is driving to the Mall better for me done slowly or faster? How is my heart rate when setting up OS X Server 10.10 drinking coffee compared to scotch? There is so much more I want to know about my lifestyle, I hope such devices can help.
  • Reply 2 of 90
    flydogflydog Posts: 112member
    great article from MicorsoftInsider. If only there was a similar site with articles about Apple products.
  • Reply 3 of 90
    I think it's a good start. Comfort and improved styling will likely make the second Gen better. The GPS is big point that the Apple Watch is missing.
  • Reply 4 of 90
    Is it just me, or is this smartphone craze simply stupid?

    I liked the iPhone the first time I saw one. For years, I'd been trying to find a phone clever enough to do what it did. Most were ill-designed junk. The iPhone, particularly when it could add apps, was a marvelous idea.

    But these smartwatches leave me wondering why anyone would want one. An AT&T salesman showed me how he could put different clock screens on his. I thought, why would I pay $200-300 for that?

    And I've got enough stuff to keep charged. The last thing I want is a watch that needs a daily charge. The one I have lasts about 5 years on a $2 battery.

    What do I want? A $10-20 gadget I can wrap around my wrist or ankle that'd vibrate when I get a call or alarm on my iPhone. That I need. The pricey calorie counting I can do without.
  • Reply 5 of 90
    mac_128mac_128 Posts: 3,282member
    So the Apple Watch illuminates when you raise it to your face? I was looking all over for an article that explained how that worked. So how close to your face does it have to be, and what turns it on, the mere act of raising your wrist? In which case, what prevents it from coming on accidentally when gesturing? So I assume it's dark all other times, and presumably one can press a button as well to illuminate the face?
  • Reply 6 of 90
    shsfshsf Posts: 302member

    Yeah, but why do you need a gps when  you are under house arrest?

  • Reply 7 of 90
    inkling wrote: »
    Is it just me, or is this smartphone craze simply stupid?

    I liked the iPhone the first time I saw one. For years, I'd been trying to find a phone clever enough to do what it did. Most were ill-designed junk. The iPhone, particularly when it could add apps, was a marvelous idea.

    But these smartwatches leave me wondering why anyone would want one. An AT&T salesman showed me how he could put different clock screens on his. I thought, why would I pay $200-300 for that?

    And I've got enough stuff to keep charged. The last thing I want is a watch that needs a daily charge. The one I have lasts about 5 years on a $2 battery.

    What do I want? A $10-20 gadget I can wrap around my wrist or ankle that'd vibrate when I get a call or alarm on my iPhone. That I need. The pricey calorie counting I can do without.

    I think you meant smartwatch craze.

    But I agree. I get the feeling that Apple feel they have to create a whole new, huge ecosystem in order to justify the high price of the Apple Watch. It just doesn't make sense. People are not going to be constantly fiddling around with their watches like they do their iPhones or iPads; it'll be far too much hassle.

    In a sense, Microsoft are showing more of the Apple focus with this Band than Apple are with their Watch. They are concentrating on a few functions which they feel are most useful to a wearable.

    What will the landscape for wearables be like in five years? It could be like the iPhone, with most people using a wearable, or it could be like Google Glass.

    I bet the latter.
  • Reply 8 of 90
    mac_128 wrote: »
    So the Apple Watch illuminates when you raise it to your face? I was looking all over for an article that explained how that worked. So how close to your face does it have to be, and what turns it on, the mere act of raising your wrist? In which case, what prevents it from coming on accidentally when gesturing? So I assume it's dark all other times, and presumably one can press a button as well to illuminate the face?

    I had been wondering this, too.

    I can't imagine how it won't keep lighting up, as we constantly move our arms, but maybe Apple have found an ingenious solution, and it is my imagination that is lacking.
  • Reply 9 of 90

    Am I wrong in thinking if a device/app communicates with MyFitnessPal and other running Apps like RunKeeper that the app/device shares its info with the App then the App that DOES communicate with HealthKit can then write/read data into HealthKit?

     

    Basically isn't this just a "middle man" work around to get the info you want into HealthKit?

     

    I understand that only certain data from an app is read/written into HealthKit but isn't it a functional work around for now.

     

    Im all down for the Apple Watch but no dedicated GPS is a no go for me until it is included.

  • Reply 10 of 90
    rogifanrogifan Posts: 10,669member
    I've heard a lot of reports of the band being uncomfortable and the screen scratching so easily that Microsoft is now including ascreen protector with the device. Also some claim the heart rate sensor is way off compared to other products they've used. No thanks.
  • Reply 11 of 90
    All I want is:
    - GPS
    - Bluetooth and music
    - time
    That's it. That's all I want. Sure I'll even throw in simple text/call notification when my phone is close to me. But seriously, why the hell can't any of these companies make a true running/workout health watch??? Every single one has a crucial missing feature that really negates the whole thing for me.
    Just venting my frustration...
  • Reply 12 of 90
    This was a solid review.

    Thanks Neil.
  • Reply 13 of 90
    chris_cachris_ca Posts: 2,543member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Inkling View Post

    What do I want? A $10-20 gadget I can wrap around my wrist or ankle that'd vibrate when I get a call or alarm on my iPhone. That I need. The pricey calorie counting I can do without.

    Your iPhone doesn’t ring or vibrate?

  • Reply 14 of 90
    cpsrocpsro Posts: 2,417member

    I'm not used to reading sideways. or diagonally.

  • Reply 15 of 90
    A tiny band like this can't even make it a day with GPS, and people want to know why a wrist computer like the AppleWatch doesn't have full cellular and GPS capability? :rolleyes:


    It doesn't look bad. But it looks like a $99 device at best. And given the years of bad experiences I've had with Microsoft hardware, I will pass.
  • Reply 16 of 90
    idreyidrey Posts: 640member
    All i want is for the apple watch to come out so I can try it. I always have my iphone on me so gps missing on the watch is not an issue for me. I want the sport version. It will probably last me for 6 month do to my work. I like watches and what i like about the apple watch is that it is a watch. Well it does more but it is virtually a watch. I actually appreciate the fact that apple didn't "re-invented" the watch. They just kind of kept the true integrity of the watch.
  • Reply 17 of 90
    morkymorky Posts: 171member
    If MS could put GPS in this, Apple could have done it in their watch. I don't want to carry a phone on a run, and I understand it kills battery, but I can recharge as needed. Sad that this is better device for running than Apple's
  • Reply 18 of 90
    idreyidrey Posts: 640member
    A tiny band like this can't even make it a day with GPS, and people want to know why a wrist computer like the AppleWatch doesn't have full cellular and GPS capability? :rolleyes:


    It doesn't look bad. But it looks like a $99 device at best. And given the years of bad experiences I've had with Microsoft hardware, I will pass.

    Agree. For $99 i might be tempted to try it. But for $200 nope. Ill save that for the apple watch. And what is it with the $5 Starbucks card?
  • Reply 19 of 90
    undefined
  • Reply 20 of 90
    undefined
Sign In or Register to comment.