Apple CEO Tim Cook among first investors in water saving shower head startup Nebia

Posted:
in General Discussion edited August 2015
The makers of a new water conserving shower head can count Apple Chief Executive Tim Cook among their first investors, who took a personal stake in the company after trying the eco-friendly product.




In addition to courting Cook as an investor, Nebia's shower heads have also been installed at Apple's corporate campus in Cupertino, Calif., according to The New York Times. Nebia is a six-person company based out of San Francisco.

The product is said to resemble the base of an iMac, and its unique design reportedly cuts down water use by up to 70 percent. A Nebia shower is said to use six gallons in an average use, while the typical shower consumes 20 gallons.

Nebia accomplishes this with specialized nozzles that turn water into tiny droplets. Doing so not only cuts down on water use, but also increases the surface area of the spray tenfold.




Though it has funding from Cook, as well as Alphabet executive Eric Schmidt, Nebia is still seeking funding through a new Kickstarter project. As of Tuesday, the effort has already exceeded its $100,000 goal.

The fully self-installed shower system features an adjustable bracket and a portable wand. With savings on water usage, Nebia claims its product pays for itself in less than two years.




On its Kickstarter page, Nebia thanks Apple for allowing the company to test its product at its campus. The new shower head has also been tested at Google, Stanford University, and Equinox Gyms.

The product is planned to retail for $399 when it hits the market, but backers on Kickstarter can get in at a discounted price of $299. Nebia estimates that it will begin shipping by May 2016.
«1345

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 83
    SpamSandwichSpamSandwich Posts: 33,407member
    Very stylish.
  • Reply 2 of 83
    sricesrice Posts: 120member
    WTH? This is mist mode on my hose sprinkler ...
  • Reply 3 of 83
    Is it HomeKit compliant? :-)
  • Reply 4 of 83
    knowitallknowitall Posts: 1,648member

    $399, ha ha ha ha.

    Maybe when I buy my $25000 iWatch.

  • Reply 5 of 83
    mike1mike1 Posts: 3,286member

    Except with no water pressure it takes 5 times longer to rinse your hair. OK for bald people I guess. Stupid waste of time for the rest of us.

  • Reply 6 of 83
    am8449am8449 Posts: 392member
    I am interested in this, but at that price point would need to try it before I buy.

    I think this is a major hurdle. The price is at least 10x the cost of a normal shower head, and given that the experience is supposed to justify the price, they need to somehow let potential buyers 'get their feet wet' to make the sale.

    Also, since I rent an apartment and don't pay the water utility bill, the savings is no incentive for me.
  • Reply 7 of 83
    MacProMacPro Posts: 19,727member
    I've long thought that in this day and age a system that the water run until the desired temperature is reached, doesn't go down the drain. Imagine how much water that would save! You see pictures of folks in California using a bucket for this and that water goes on their plants but surely this could be internalized in the water system itself so the water than runs until the pipes warm up is automatically returned to the storage tank by the use of thermal valves. (patent pending) ;)
  • Reply 8 of 83
    SpamSandwichSpamSandwich Posts: 33,407member
    I've long thought that in this day and age a system that the water run until the desired temperature is reached, doesn't go down the drain. Imagine how much water that would save! You see pictures of folks in California using a bucket for this and that water goes on their plants but surely this could be internalized in the water system itself so the water than runs until the pipes warm up is automatically returned to the storage tank by the use of thermal valves. (patent pending) ;)

    With modern wall-mounted home water heaters, there's no waiting for the water to heat up.
  • Reply 9 of 83
    MacProMacPro Posts: 19,727member
    sog35 wrote: »
    I get it.

    But I'd be frustrated having a mist shower.

    The ten fold surface area of the water droplets maybe more than compensates for the seemingly less amount of water flowing in terms of the feeling and washability .... I'd have to try one to know but I suspect so.
  • Reply 10 of 83
    kpluckkpluck Posts: 500member

    I can see why Tim Cook is interested in this, they are charging hundreds of dollars for something that shouldn't cost more than $50. <img class=" src="http://forums-files.appleinsider.com/images/smilies//lol.gif" />

     

    -kpluck

  • Reply 11 of 83
    MacProMacPro Posts: 19,727member
    With modern wall-mounted home water heaters, there's no waiting for the water to heat up.

    I I know I had one of those years ago but the vast number of homes that don't have instant hot water right at the point of the shower need such a system.
  • Reply 12 of 83
    Hmm probably try the mist shower with my hose :)
  • Reply 13 of 83
    MacProMacPro Posts: 19,727member
    kpluck wrote: »
    I can see why Tim Cook is interested in this, they are charging hundreds of dollars for something that shouldn't cost more than $50. :lol:

    -kpluck

    Here is your opportunity then, go design and sell a competitor for $50!
  • Reply 14 of 83
    bdkennedy1bdkennedy1 Posts: 1,459member
    This was tried in the 90's. People found that they saved some water and it took 3x longer to take a shower.
  • Reply 15 of 83
    SpamSandwichSpamSandwich Posts: 33,407member
    Here is your opportunity then, go design and sell a competitor for $50!

    http://www.thisiswhyimbroke.com/flexible-misting-hose
  • Reply 16 of 83
    Why aren't building codes updated to mandate either tankless water heaters in all new construction or insulated hot-water-loops? When we built our rambler in the late 1980's, the plumber installed an insulated hot-water loop which ran to all remote bathrooms and the kitchen and back out into the garage, where the water tank was located. A small electric pump kept the water circulating. Here's the deal - when we went to use the sinks or shower from our master bedroom, which was WAY at the opposite corner from our garage, we didn't have to let the water run and run and run - it was instantly hot, because the plumbing just tied into the loop.

    All of the water that is wasted down the drain while waiting for it to warm up - that's low-hanging fruit if you're trying to conserve water, people!
  • Reply 17 of 83
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by digitalclips View Post



    ...surely this could be internalized in the water system itself so the water than runs until the pipes warm up is automatically returned to the storage tank...

     

    This has been done and used in one of the toughest environments around for years-- the International Space Station. It gets all water from air, sweat, human waste, anything that has a byproduct generating or causing condensate H2O, etc...

     

    At 8.3 lbs/gal (1.0 atm, room temp, etc...) it would be the most expensive consumable shipped to the ISS -- unless of course they found a way to ship dehydrated. ¡

     

    :D

  • Reply 18 of 83
    cnocbuicnocbui Posts: 3,613member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by SpamSandwich View Post



    Very stylish.



    No it isn't.

     

    Hans Grohe Raindance - FTW.

     

    Luckily, I don't need to conserve water so can shower under a deluge.

  • Reply 19 of 83
    kent909kent909 Posts: 731member
    I have a shower head that I got from Lowe's that puts out 1.6 gpm. I paid $39.95. I take 4-5 minute showers witch includes the time for hot water to arrive. So why would I want this. The ROI is going to be much longer than 2 years. As anoher commenter pointed out if you solve the problem of waiting for hot water you will do much more good.
  • Reply 20 of 83
    maestro64maestro64 Posts: 5,043member

    Should work great until hard water hits the thing.

     

    The problem with all the low flow shower heads (and I have used the same one (1.5 gpm) since the 90's and love it) they get clogged with hard water deposits. I have to clean mine every few years to it works correctly. Look at this design cleaning it is not going to be easy.

Sign In or Register to comment.