Lawfirm considers suit over iPhone's Touch ID-connected 'Error 53'
A Seattle-based lawfirm is considering a class action lawsuit against Apple, following reports of an "Error 53" message some iPhone owners have seen after having unofficial repairs done on their Touch ID sensor.
The firm, PCVA, is investigating the option, and soliticting complaints from people affected by the glitch, The Guardian said on Monday. The message is triggered if people get unauthorized repairs that affect the Touch ID sensor, and then try to update or restore their iPhone. At that stage the phone is rendered both unusable and ineligible for warranty coverage.
"We believe Apple may be intentionally forcing users to use their repair services, which cost much more than most third-party repair shops," PCVA claimed, noting that the public would find it unacceptable if carmakers forced drivers to bring vehicles into an official dealership for service.
The firm said it would represent any affected people coming forward for free.
In its defense, Apple has said that it's trying to protect the security of users. Touch ID normally saves data in a component known as the Secure Enclave, and in theory unofficial parts could be used to steal a user's fingerprint. During official repairs Apple re-validates the pairing between the Touch ID sensor and the Enclave.
The company is asking people impacted by Error 53 to contact Apple Support, but to date the only known solution has been to get a replacement iPhone.
The firm, PCVA, is investigating the option, and soliticting complaints from people affected by the glitch, The Guardian said on Monday. The message is triggered if people get unauthorized repairs that affect the Touch ID sensor, and then try to update or restore their iPhone. At that stage the phone is rendered both unusable and ineligible for warranty coverage.
"We believe Apple may be intentionally forcing users to use their repair services, which cost much more than most third-party repair shops," PCVA claimed, noting that the public would find it unacceptable if carmakers forced drivers to bring vehicles into an official dealership for service.
The firm said it would represent any affected people coming forward for free.
In its defense, Apple has said that it's trying to protect the security of users. Touch ID normally saves data in a component known as the Secure Enclave, and in theory unofficial parts could be used to steal a user's fingerprint. During official repairs Apple re-validates the pairing between the Touch ID sensor and the Enclave.
The company is asking people impacted by Error 53 to contact Apple Support, but to date the only known solution has been to get a replacement iPhone.
Comments
Yeah we knew this was coming, but if the error is due to the fact the touch ID and secure elements are linked together for security purposes there is not a whole lot they can argue about going to a non-authorized repair places. Also warranty repairs are free so their is no cost impact to the user to get something fixed under warranty. This issue only applies to those phones outside warranty, so you warranty is not violated when it is already outside of the warranty period. Looks like this lawyers do not understand US warranty laws.
It is kind of like being upset you can not take your electronic safe to anyone you like to change the locking mechanism and when you do and they screw it up and thief break into your safe and steal all your valuables you want to sue the safe manufacturer. We all know how the courts will rule in that case.
With that said, I would still be upset I could not repaid my own Iphone. I have done my fair share of repairs on old Iphones, done batteries, broken displays, and home buttons. I guess this is one things I will not be repairing myself when I am out of warranty.
Oh well.
Nonsense... most people will have their iPhones repaired by Apple. That's a no-brainer.
A good start...
http://www.pcvalaw.com Pfau Cochran Vertetis Amala, seems like they concentrate on class action lawsuits. I'm not saying they're ambulance chasers and I understand why they pursued some of their cases, but it would be nice if they actually did some research into this event before they jumped onto Facebook to look for people who won't get much out of it while they get a lot. I can also understand why they don't bother pursuing any litigation against Android-based mobile devices because they already know there's no money to be made.
(Six male partners, four male associates and two token female associates. Maybe someone should talk to them about diversity.)
My analogy to this issue is someone losing their house key, calling a lock repairperson who drills out the lock, replaces the lock with a new lock and calls everything good. The problem is, once that lock is broken, anyone can get in (until it's replaced) and the lock repairperson could keep the key pattern and make new keys to get into your house at a later date. Apple creates a unique pair of keys, both of which need to be present, in order to unlock the phone. If your Touch ID assembly is bad, Apple or one of its authorized repair centers has the ability to re-key or pair the new Touch ID module to the iPhone. If it's done wrong (it doesn't matter who's doing it wrong), the data in the secure enclave, which contains all the passwords and encryption keys necessary to decrypt your phone, should be deleted. No way I want someone being able to get to the data on my phone, which also includes logons and passwords to Safari websites. Like I said, there's more to this security configuration than you're talking about.
One last thing. If you want Apple to expand their presence into the enterprise, health and government environment, the way Apple has configured Touch ID and the secure enclave goes a long way, like a 450-ft home run, towards getting their hardware approved, including for classified operations. Without the ability to keep non-authorized personnel from accessing government or enterprise secure information or medical information (HIPAA) Apple will have a hard time maintaining any presence in these areas. With it, and I believe they're the only manufacturers who can document a secure mobile device, they could rule these businesses. Is it worth a couple bricked iPhones? To me it is.
When it comes to unauthorised repairs, there's only one rule: Caveat Emptor.