Apple's mobile Safari & Apple TV products see increased pressure in 2015, Adobe study says

Posted:
in General Discussion edited March 2016
According to the latest statistics gathered by Adobe Digital Index researchers, Apple's mobile Safari product is being outpaced by Google Chrome, Apple TV views slumped over the holidays and the company's brand image took a hit on social media in February.




In data culled from 600 billion website visits between January 2015 and January 2016, Adobe saw Google Chrome browser usage on smartphones outpace Safari by 127 percent globally. Both browsers experienced year-over-year growth, however, with Chrome netting a 75 percent bump to Safari's 33 percent rise over the same period.

Becky Tasker, Managing Analyst at Adobe Digital Index, told AppleInsider the slight shift favoring Chrome might be explained by its unified experience across multiple platforms and operating systems. Apple has rolled out its own innovations in browsing session portability, including Continuity features like Handoff that let users pick up on a Mac where they left off on iPhone, but integration is limited to Apple's ecosystem.




Narrowing the data to iOS device owners, browser usage unsurprisingly trends toward Safari, which comes preinstalled on all Apple products. Echoing the overall smartphone market, both Safari and Chrome saw respective 34 percent and 19 percent increases in measured visits.

In a survey conducted as part of the study, 43 percent of iOS device owners said they prefer using Safari for their Web browsing needs, while 33 percent chose Chrome.




On a related note, site visits from OS X were down 5 percent year-over-year, but Macs experienced an uptick late last year and is now leading Microsoft's Windows. Overall, however, mobile device proliferation is sucking the air out of the room.

Breaking down share by device type, smartphones drove 76 percent of all mobile visits to the sites monitored by Adobe, with 46 percent originating on iPhone. Android smartphones were responsible for 30 percent of aggregate views. Tablets drove a meager 24 percent of mobile visits, with iPad taking 18 percent of the whole as compared to Android's 5 percent.




On Apple TV, Adobe found authenticated viewing, or watching content that requires a sign in to stream, dropped 8 percent from August to December of last year. Prior to the dip, Apple's set-top box was leading Roku, at one point touching an apex of over 50 percent, but the industry stalwart gained 4 percent over the same period to cross over at the end of 2015. Apple regained its lead in January.

Tasker says aggressive price cuts and 4K HDTV compatibility likely contributed to Roku's rise over the holiday shopping season, a time window in which Apple announced and released a fourth-generation Apple TV device that outputs at a max resolution of 1080p.

Amazon Fire TV products and gaming consoles take small shares of the authenticated viewing market, but not enough threaten Apple TV and Roku's dominance in the space.




Finally, Adobe took a look at social media buzz ahead of next week's "Let us loop you in" event. Interestingly, overall social sentiment is down month-over-month and now sits below two percent for North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific regions. It's not exactly clear what, exactly, is suppressing mindshare, though Apple is embroiled in a high-profile court case with the U.S. Department of Justice over iPhone encryption.

As for specific products expected to debut at Monday's event, iPhone SE dominated global social media mentions measured from Feb. 24 to Mar. 8. Following close behind were combined mentions for a 9.7-inch iPad Pro and iPad Air 3, which are rumored to be one in the same.
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 33
    9secondkox29secondkox2 Posts: 2,719member
    I can see the Apple TV thing not looking so rosy. 

    Apple let has yet to convince me that I need one. 

    Mean Xbox One, PS4, and my Mac, iPad, and iPhone seem to redundantly supply all I could possibly need an Apple TV for. 


    BUT...


    the mobile browser thing is stupid. 

    How many android free phones and otherwise exist out there compared to iPhones? Lol

    That's just ridiculous. 
  • Reply 2 of 33
    calicali Posts: 3,494member
    Well Apple fans said 4K in Apple TV didn't matter. I don't think it's important right now but it's still weird that they skipped 4K on Apple TV while adding 4K on iPhone.
    singularitySpamSandwichcornchip
  • Reply 3 of 33
    Am I blind or something? I don't see any bad news for Apple in that graphs  :/
    cornchip
  • Reply 4 of 33
    brakkenbrakken Posts: 687member
    Um, so?
  • Reply 5 of 33
    What's this ? A Adobe news-'FLASH' ?

    I wonder; how did this news-flash come to light ? Through one of their unpatched backdoors ?

    This grudge, that Adobe holds, for Steve calling flash what it (still) is... That grudge is growing a very, very long beard !
  • Reply 6 of 33
    OMG! It's only 30% INCREASE!! Doomed!!!!
  • Reply 7 of 33
    mike1mike1 Posts: 3,286member
    OMG. It has almost nothing to do with 4K. It has to do with the fact that virtually every new TV sold is a "Smart TV" that offers the ability to stream directly to the TV without the need for an Apple TV or a Roku or a Fire or anything else. May not offer everything, but they generally provide Netflix and Amazon Prime which is all most people want. Smart TVs are not shown anywhere in that graph.
    6Sgoldfishcornchip
  • Reply 8 of 33
    tmaytmay Posts: 6,340member
    cali said:
    Well Apple fans said 4K in Apple TV didn't matter. I don't think it's important right now but it's still weird that they skipped 4K on Apple TV while adding 4K on iPhone.
    Now that the industry has adopted Ultra HD as the 4k premium branding (with HDR amongst other things), I can see myself at least looking at upgrading from 1080p down the road. When the time comes, I would hope that Apple provides a 4k HDR stream/download and so my expectation is that he next gen Apple TV will accommodate that.

    The other end of it is that Apple is having to build out its data centers to handle this, as noted in a recent thread on AI. Once that happens, I would expect the next generation Apple TV to arrive.


    cali
  • Reply 9 of 33
    MacProMacPro Posts: 19,727member
    mike1 said:
    OMG. It has almost nothing to do with 4K. It has to do with the fact that virtually every new TV sold is a "Smart TV" that offers the ability to stream directly to the TV without the need for an Apple TV or a Roku or a Fire or anything else. May not offer everything, but they generally provide Netflix and Amazon Prime which is all most people want. Smart TVs are not shown anywhere in that graph.
    As we have three Apple TVs in our home I have never even looked at Smart TVs so I no nothing about them.  Tell me can you stream your iPhone, Mac or iPhone to them, can you use your iCloud Photos or Aperture Library for screen savers or slide shows on them, can you play anything form your iTunes Match account on them?  Can you talk to them?  I would assume some of the above are possible ... yes .. no?
    bestkeptsecret
  • Reply 10 of 33
    lkrupplkrupp Posts: 10,557member
    Am I blind or something? I don't see any bad news for Apple in that graphs  :/
    It’s the same old drumbeat we heard in the early days of the Macintosh. Apple must become a clone maker in order to survive. Apple must go cheap and license iOS to every cheap assed OEM out there. Selling more for less is the way to go. Forget about margins, it’s volume that makes you successful. Apple didn’t listen then and they won’t take the bait now either.
    creativeonelostkiwicornchipbadmonk
  • Reply 11 of 33
    supadav03supadav03 Posts: 503member
    mike1 said:
    OMG. It has almost nothing to do with 4K. It has to do with the fact that virtually every new TV sold is a "Smart TV" that offers the ability to stream directly to the TV without the need for an Apple TV or a Roku or a Fire or anything else. May not offer everything, but they generally provide Netflix and Amazon Prime which is all most people want. Smart TVs are not shown anywhere in that graph.
    This is probably true but I would never use a smart TV for streaming. I currently have a 65 inch 4K LG Smart TV and have never even hooked it up to my wifi.  Have you seen the privacy policies for those things? Roku as well. Just terrible. I'll stick with my ATV3 & ATV4 for streaming.
    lostkiwibonobobcalibadmonk
  • Reply 12 of 33
    rob53rob53 Posts: 3,251member
    Adobe is still trying to be relevant, which they aren't except for the professional users with lots of money who are locked into the Adobe Suite. Otherwise, I don't think the majority of people care what Adobe has to say or even where they got these numbers. Everyone knows numbers can be manipulated to produce a desired result.

    As for Google Chrome, it just shows that many people don't understand how much data Google grabs from users and how much more pleasant things would be if we didn't get so many targeted ads. We complain that our government doesn't understand much of anything, I see users being the same way. I can't even get my brothers to get rid of gmail accounts and Chrome and they are intelligent. 
    calilostkiwicornchip
  • Reply 13 of 33
    SpamSandwichSpamSandwich Posts: 33,407member
    How many people uninstalled Flash during this period? I finally had it, uninstalled Flash and now can't even watch YouTube videos.
    melodyof1974lostkiwi
  • Reply 14 of 33
    wood1208wood1208 Posts: 2,913member
    Mobile browser comparison is not fair as chrome is available on both ios and android platform while safari is only on ios. Apple-TV is fine. Just need more apps like Amazon prime,Sling,Xfinity, etc and skinny ala-carte TV channels package. Road to get their is treacherous but will get their.
    calicornchip
  • Reply 15 of 33
    rob53rob53 Posts: 3,251member
    How many people uninstalled Flash during this period? I finally had it, uninstalled Flash and now can't even watch YouTube videos.
    I uninstalled at least six months ago. Many websites can still be accessed by using the Develop (Advanced/Show Develop menu) menu and changing the User Agent to Safari-iOS9.1-iPad. As for YouTube videos, I don't have a problem viewing them in Safari. They automatically come up as HTML5. I thought YouTube finished their changover a few months ago.
  • Reply 16 of 33
    mike1mike1 Posts: 3,286member
    mike1 said:
    OMG. It has almost nothing to do with 4K. It has to do with the fact that virtually every new TV sold is a "Smart TV" that offers the ability to stream directly to the TV without the need for an Apple TV or a Roku or a Fire or anything else. May not offer everything, but they generally provide Netflix and Amazon Prime which is all most people want. Smart TVs are not shown anywhere in that graph.
    As we have three Apple TVs in our home I have never even looked at Smart TVs so I no nothing about them.  Tell me can you stream your iPhone, Mac or iPhone to them, can you use your iCloud Photos or Aperture Library for screen savers or slide shows on them, can you play anything form your iTunes Match account on them?  Can you talk to them?  I would assume some of the above are possible ... yes .. no?
    No. I never implied that the TV could do all that an ATV can do. Nor does the survey cover those features. The survey measures streaming use from log-in services and called out no 4K as a possible reason ATV use was down slightly and I simply offered another reason as to why that is possible. I would venture to speculate that the typical user is mainly interested in streaming content. Netflix streaming, after all, is the single largest source for data use on the planet. Your extreme use case is not common or typical. However, it is an excellent reason to own an ATV as I also do. But I do use it less often than I did.
  • Reply 17 of 33
    mike1mike1 Posts: 3,286member
    supadav03 said:
    mike1 said:
    OMG. It has almost nothing to do with 4K. It has to do with the fact that virtually every new TV sold is a "Smart TV" that offers the ability to stream directly to the TV without the need for an Apple TV or a Roku or a Fire or anything else. May not offer everything, but they generally provide Netflix and Amazon Prime which is all most people want. Smart TVs are not shown anywhere in that graph.
    This is probably true but I would never use a smart TV for streaming. I currently have a 65 inch 4K LG Smart TV and have never even hooked it up to my wifi.  Have you seen the privacy policies for those things? Roku as well. Just terrible. I'll stick with my ATV3 & ATV4 for streaming.

    Do you think the average consumer reads or cares about that? They see the big red Netflix button on the remote, enter their WiFi password and off they go.
    lostkiwi
  • Reply 18 of 33
    rob53rob53 Posts: 3,251member

    mike1 said:
    OMG. It has almost nothing to do with 4K. It has to do with the fact that virtually every new TV sold is a "Smart TV" that offers the ability to stream directly to the TV without the need for an Apple TV or a Roku or a Fire or anything else. May not offer everything, but they generally provide Netflix and Amazon Prime which is all most people want. Smart TVs are not shown anywhere in that graph.
    I went into a nice audio/video store and asked if there were any non-smart TVs available. I don't want all the garbage they stick onto TVs. No Netflix, no Amazon Prime, no ethernet, nothing except an HDMI input or two. It's like computerized washing machines. Give me a simple one with mechanical controls and they work fine for a whole lot less money. The problem is, getting a "dumb" monitor costs several times more than a supposed smart one. 

    ---Just helped fix a computerized washing machine that wouldn't start a cycle. Nothing was working, couldn't even get into diagnostic mode. Unplugged it, let the power drain, plugged back in and heard a click. It started working again. I'm used to dealing with these sorts of crazy operations but people shouldn't have to worry about them on simple things and TVs should be simple. All-in-one devices can work well if they're designed properly but TV vendors, all 10K of them, haven't the faintest idea how to provide a good GUI because all I hear are complaints about TVs not being easy to use.
    calibadmonk
  • Reply 19 of 33
    sirlance99sirlance99 Posts: 1,293member
    mike1 said:
    OMG. It has almost nothing to do with 4K. It has to do with the fact that virtually every new TV sold is a "Smart TV" that offers the ability to stream directly to the TV without the need for an Apple TV or a Roku or a Fire or anything else. May not offer everything, but they generally provide Netflix and Amazon Prime which is all most people want. Smart TVs are not shown anywhere in that graph.
    As we have three Apple TVs in our home I have never even looked at Smart TVs so I no nothing about them.  Tell me can you stream your iPhone, Mac or iPhone to them, can you use your iCloud Photos or Aperture Library for screen savers or slide shows on them, can you play anything form your iTunes Match account on them?  Can you talk to them?  I would assume some of the above are possible ... yes .. no?
    You can do all that with your iPhone using Chromecast along with Google Music and Google Photos. 
  • Reply 20 of 33
    CMA102DLCMA102DL Posts: 121member
    I use Mozilla!
Sign In or Register to comment.