Facebook Oculus update lowers hardware requirements, promises social experiences

Posted:
in General Discussion
Facebook has unveiled the next steps in the Oculus virtual reality platform, including a sneak peek at a wireless version of the Oculus Rift, and an initiative to lower the hardware requirements needed to use the system to specs already exceeded by Apple's 4K and 5K Retina iMac lines.









Citing a "slow start" in 2016 for Facebook's Oculus program, CEO Mark Zuckerberg took the stage today to discuss the long-term social future of the platform, and what's in store in the next few months. Claiming that the current hardware is sufficient for great experiences, most of the announcements on Thursday were on the software and peripheral side of things.



As expected, Facebook wants to add social experiences to the Oculus Rift. Demoed on Thursday were VR avatars for players, with exaggerated, cartoony facial expressions, currently missing from social VR experiences.









The environment was explored using Oculus' $200 Touch controller, announced today. No dramatic changes have been made to the exterior of the controller since it was first revealed, and functionality and tracking resolution remains the same, according to Facebook.

Roaming, versus tethered VR



Zuckerberg briefly touched on a demo product of the consumer Oculus Rift, that wasn't tethered to a gaming computer. While not on stage for the keynote, Zuckerberg claims that a roaming version of VR, where a user can wander around a space and be tracked by a software and hardware combination is where the future lies for the technology.









"We all know where we want to improve and where we want virtual reality to eventually get -- It's this feeling of real presence," said Zuckerberg. "We want hardware that's a lighter form factor and smaller, that can do both VR and AR, that can do eye tracing and mouth tracking and hand tracking."

Under the hood, from a developer's perspective



The Unreal Engine is the main developer's tool for developing for the Oculus Rift. The software is free, but Epic claims a portion of revenues generated from titles made with the environment.



A fund newly started by Oculus will cover license fees for the Unreal Engine. Oculus will pay fees for up to the first $5 million in gross revenue, in an attempt to kickstart development for the platform.



The Rift SDK will see an update soon, implementing a feature called "aschyncronous timewarp." The feature, intended to fill in gaps for lost frames so the user does not become ill, "kicks in, grabs the previous frame and the most recent head orientation, and warps it into place," allowing for the app to catch up and not render the missed frames.



Asynchronous timewarp, and other engine efficiency improvements, allows for lower frame rates to simulate a "mandatory" 90 FPS experience. As a result, the minimum specifications for a VR system have been lowered to an Intel i3-6100 processor, 8GB of RAM, HDMI video, three USB ports, coupled with a Nvidia 960 or greater GPU.



macOS support was not announced at the event on Thursday, but the existing crop of high-end 4k and 5k Retina iMacs now fit the bill for compatibility. Oculus has previously stated that it would build the SDK for macOS when the Apple-build hardware could support the platform.

The web, in VR



Another attempt to launch development is the "Carmel" VR browser. Oculus will tune it to run on "any VR device" and it will shift web browsing to a more VR-friendly format, with virtual spaces, and other niceties.



The Carmel browser utilizes the avatars that Zuckerberg had demonstrated earlier in the presentation, giving users a persistent identity anywhere on the Oculus Rift platform.



The new browser, and the VR avatars will shift to mobile-based VR experiences like The Samsung Gear VR in early 2017

Mobile VR



Oculus touched on improvements to the mobile SDK.



Coming to the smartphone-oriented version of the VR toolset, Oculus is adding a remote monitor to aid in developer performance improvements in titles, as well as a video SDK to allow for streaming.



Oculus is pledging $50 million in 2016 to boost mobile VR game development.

Supplemental hardware



Along with all the other announcements, Oculus has also released new earphones for $50 which the company promises sound quality "as good as a $900 pair of headphones."



For room-scale roaming VR, a $80 third sensor is available as well.

Apple and VR



While Apple had utterly no presence, or mentions in Thursday's reveal event, the company has hinted several times that augmented reality, and virtual reality technologies were being examined in-depth as potential future areas of entry.



Earlier this month, Zeyu Li, a former Magic Leap employee joined Apple as a Senior Computer Vision Algorithm Engineer. Yury Petrov, who worked as a research scientist at Facebook's Oculus since 2013, took an identical position at Apple in June.



From patents for AR devices with transparent displays to iPhone-powered VR headsets, evidence of Apple's interest in the space is mounting.



During a quarterly investor conference call in January, CEO Tim Cook responded to a question about Apple's potential role in the future of VR, saying he thinks the technology is "cool" and has interesting applications.



Cook expanded on those thoughts six months later during Apple's most recent earnings call, confirming investments in AR technology, adding that the potential for growth is "huge."



Apple last year acquired motion capture specialist Faceshift and German AR firm Metaio.



Cook mentioned Apple's ongoing development of AR solutions in an interview in August, and did again speaking with ABC News' Robin Roberts in mid-September.



Asked about the prospect of Apple-branded virtual and augmented reality products, Cook said that while VR promises "cool" applications for gaming and education, AR technology is of particular interest.



"There's virtual reality and there's augmented reality -- both of these are incredibly interesting," Cook said to Roberts. "But my own view is that augmented reality is the larger of the two, probably by far."

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 14
    irelandireland Posts: 17,391member
    VR saddens me for our species.
    baconstangtallest skilmattinozwatto_cobraSpamSandwich
  • Reply 2 of 14
    calicali Posts: 3,495member
    Apple needs to get in this space. These things are hideous!
    EsquireCats
  • Reply 3 of 14
    nolamacguynolamacguy Posts: 4,758member
    ireland said:
    VR saddens me for our species.
    my grandfather's generation would say the same about sitting behind huge monitors, noses stuck in phones, and video gaming. 

    this is just a tool which will have several uses and cases. one needn't pursue any or all of them. 
    fastasleeplolliveraddicted44watto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 14
    thrangthrang Posts: 727member
    "In the photo above, Zuckerberg and a board member use Occulus to hunt for a market for the device..." How often do you think Zuckerberg uses this crap? Each headset should have imprinted, in white ITC Machine font, LOSER across front. As Cook said, AR makes more sense for widespread adoption - an affordable set of eyeglasses that expressly does not capture photos or videos. But in conjunction with the iPhone and Apple Watch, provides real time overlays of any number of categories - products, services, sightseeing, transit, entertainment, etc...
    baconstangwatto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 14




    They look ridiculous.
    baconstangSpamSandwich
  • Reply 6 of 14
    irelandireland Posts: 17,391member
    ireland said:
    VR saddens me for our species.
    my grandfather's generation would say the same about sitting behind huge monitors, noses stuck in phones, and video gaming.
    And he'd probably be right.
    tallest skilwatto_cobra
  • Reply 7 of 14
    tallest skiltallest skil Posts: 43,399member

    WE SHALL PREVAIL.

    watto_cobraSpamSandwich
  • Reply 8 of 14
    Yes but Oculus's idea of being social is posting "Memes for Trump".
    lolliverbaconstangwatto_cobra
  • Reply 9 of 14
    welshdogwelshdog Posts: 1,608member
    Having a lot of trouble developing any interest in these technologies.  Might be great, might be the next 3D TV.
    mattinozbaconstang
  • Reply 10 of 14
    Oculus is a funny product and company. They immediately squandered their lead and now are releasing products 6 months late to market. They are both first and last to market.

    It's amusing to remind ourselves of Palmer Luckey, the weirdly angry young man who started Oculus and was adamant that their product couldn't possibly run on mac computers or any hardware that wasn't featuring the latest GPU, despite Oculus's competitors such as HTC already having functioning hardware on the market - which was both more refined, better featured and with a tie-in to Steam software titles.

    Now here we are, near the end of 2016 and Oculus are just releasing hardware that could feasibly compete with HTC in the market, some 6 months late...again.
    mattinozsully54
  • Reply 11 of 14
    Google Glass on (virtual) steroids. 
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 12 of 14
    misamisa Posts: 827member
    Facebook has unveiled the next steps in the Oculus virtual reality platform, including a sneak peek at a wireless version of the Oculus Rift, and an initiative to lower the hardware requirements needed to use the system to specs already exceeded by Apple's 4K and 5K Retina iMac lines.

    ...


    "There's virtual reality and there's augmented reality -- both of these are incredibly interesting," Cook said to Roberts. "But my own view is that augmented reality is the larger of the two, probably by far."
    Um no, what they did here was nerf the software so that it can run on much crappier hardware and not make people want to vomit in 30 seconds. That's not really any improvement. You still need the top-of-the-line, one-generation removed, hardware or better or you are just going to have a miserable time.

    I've already seen these things being demo'd at the Microsoft store, and quite honestly the thing frightens me for the amount of money you have to drop in order not have a sickening experience (over $3000) I would not touch these things until "$99 GPU" 's are the same performance as current $600 GPU's like the 1070 and 1080. A 960 is "minimum" like "a 386 with 4MB of RAM" was a minimum to run Windows 95 when you really needed a Pentium 75 and 8MB of ram.

    We didn't learn. "Minimum" requirements always mean "you will not like the experience, not one bit, but if you're desparate, you can play." Early MMORPG players learned this the hardware when they had Dial-up and people on the other side of the planet had better latency due to having cable.




    edited October 2016 rcponewatto_cobra
  • Reply 13 of 14
    SpamSandwichSpamSandwich Posts: 29,767member
    Unless Oculus pivots to be an AR-centric company, they are risking complete irrelevancy.
  • Reply 14 of 14
    These devices are still unwieldy and ugly. Who is really going to want to wear one for long periods of time anyhow as the weight of the device will make it quite uncomfortable. There's a tremendous amount of hardware issues for the technology to become mainstream at an affordable cost. Transparent displays would help tremendously in building a device more akin to regular glasses. A corded device won't have to worry about battery life, but eliminates portability. Corded to an external battery might work. The I/O interface of the device might be able to be done wirelessly but adding a radio means additional weight and lower battery time than a corded solution. Such a solution will come eventually. But it's not here and I personally wouldn't wear any of these current devices on my head for any length of time. No one has learned from the Google glass experience.
Sign In or Register to comment.