Watch: iPhone 7 Plus Portrait Mode vs. DSLR
Apple with the recent release of iOS 10.1 enabled Portrait Mode on iPhone 7 Plus, allowing users to add a touch of artistic blur to their images by simulating an enhanced depth-of-field effect. AppleInsider compares the still-in-beta feature to a true prosumer DSLR, the Canon 5D Mark IV with full-frame sensor.
For more videos like this, subscribe to the official AppleInsider channel on YouTube.
For more videos like this, subscribe to the official AppleInsider channel on YouTube.
Comments
The point of a smartphone camera is to be able to take impulse photos. That is all. If you are seriously using it to take photos of your wedding, or produce a 4K film get your head examined because you lose 75% of the color and resolution with jpeg compression even if you lightly compress it to retain the details.
Ironically, recognizing that the 5D is a pro camera would show that the iPhone is comparable to one of the best cameras out there rather than just some second-tier high-end camera.
The whole point of Apple adding this feature (and improving camera quality overall) is so that the everyday pictures people are always taking with their iPhone look better than they used to. How can giving people nicer pictures (even though they are not as good as a DSLR) be considered as anything other than a positive experience?
And if you don't need the autofocus performance, digital rangefinders (like Leica) or medium-format cameras (Hasselblad, Phase One, or Leaf) give far higher image quality.
Next, consider carrying a Canon 5D around for a couple of years while taking those 10,000 photos. How much would you have to be paid to carry that bulky Canon 5D with you 24x7, 365 days x 2 years? I wouldn't, but some people may agree to carry a brick around for $1 a day. Over two years, that's $730. That inconvenience is worth far more than enough to upgrade to a new iPhone every year -- until the Canon 5D is obsolete, and the iPhone camera has new features. If you would have to be paid $5/day to carry a brick, then we're looking at $3650 worth of inconvenience over a two-year time frame.
Of course, you don't have to carry the Canon 5D brick everywhere you go. On occasions when the 5D is left at home, the iPhone camera is worth infinitely more than the Canon. I can certainly think of use-cases that justify the incremental cost and inconvenience of the Canon 5D -- commercial photographers, dedicated hobbyists, status-seeking showoffs, etc. However, those do not apply to me. When I'm spending my money (as opposed to yours), the inferior photos of the iPhone 7+ are just what the doctor ordered.
That being said, those same photos look like shit compared to the ones I take with my Canon 5DM3. When you look at an iPhone photo by itself, of course it looks great so long as there's no reference.
I have friends that take wonderful phone photographs and sadly, they consider themselves to be "photographers" and relish the compliments they receive when they post their photos. They become very quiet immediately after I publish 5D shots. That's the difference that an SLR will provide.
But back to the iPhone... I agree with the posts that it's all about the camera you have with you when you need to take a photo. To that end, the advancements of smartphone cameras have been amazing. It's sill not DSLR level, but will meet the needs of the vast majority of people.