Some people you'd just want to hunt down and kill...
...just too much for words. Maybe matsu would agree on a few points this bozo states but I'm steamed...
<a href="http://news.com.com/2010-1071-979757.html?tag=fd_nc_1" target="_blank">c|net moron article...</a>
Ahhh, it's c|net...what am I getting all hung up about...?
<a href="http://news.com.com/2010-1071-979757.html?tag=fd_nc_1" target="_blank">c|net moron article...</a>
Ahhh, it's c|net...what am I getting all hung up about...?
Comments
-robo
The uninitiated, though, saw something different: two notebooks. The elegant new PowerBook comes with a 17-inch screen, but it's not all that different than 16-inch-screen models from Sony and Toshiba. A nearly identically configured Sony Vaio, in fact, sells for $2,699--$600 less than the PowerBook.
Apple's new mini-notebook, meanwhile, fits squarely within its category. It's not the thinnest or lightest model (that distinction belongs to the 2-pound Sharp Muramasa) or, at $1,799, the cheapest. It's good, it looks cool--but it's a mini-notebook. Outside of Japan, a depressed market, few people buy them.
*ahem*
I don't think it's necessary to even comment. It's obvious this man has the brain power of a used tampon.
"(Of course, think of the scary flip side. If Apple had changed the course of history in the 1980s and emerged as the guiding force in computing, we'd be up to our necks in graphic artists, freelance DJs and career temp employees.)"
Check that sig, that's right, I'm not above giving credit or cash, when it's warranted.
<strong>Sure it's done in an inflamatory way, but web-sites need hits, duh?</strong><hr></blockquote>
It seems like it's in vogue to bash Apple. While some PC mags have started to actually try a Mac before passing judgement, the case in not the same for many "technology reporters".
I mean are these comments really warranted? Surely if they're so happy with the way things work on their PC's, why do they seem so threatened by a platform with a marketshare of only 2.5%?