Apple's Australian tax bill falls to $164M despite rising profits

Posted:
in General Discussion
Apple's Australian tax bill dropped AUD$18.8 million to $164 million in 2018, despite revenues climbing from $8.04 billion to $9.08 billion, and gross profits rising from $756 million to $900 million, a report revealed on Friday.

Australian cash


The company did register $543 million in "selling, general and administrative expenses," up from $512 million, according to The Age. Factoring in that number slashes Apple's profits to $396 million, off which Apple appears to have paid Australia's standard 30 percent corporate tax rate, along with $15 million in non-deductible expenses, and an under-provision from earlier years of $30 million. The company had a higher under-provision in 2017, $90 million.

Net, after-tax profits for 2018 were $232 million, beating any figure in the past five years. In 2017 that sum was just $71 million.

The company's 2018 tax bill was largely consistent with recent years, compared against $182 million in 2017 and $128 million in 2016.

An international advocacy group, the Tax Justice Network, has raised questions about the Australian government's policies, asking how it's possible that a company can pay relatively consistent taxes despite surging revenue, likewise calling for more transparency in expense reporting.

Apple has often been accused of exploiting loopholes in low-tax countries to avoid paying in the markets where it actually makes most of its money. In Europe, for instance, it has funneled much of its income through Irish subsidiaries. In 2016 that resulted in a tough European Commission ruling, ordering Ireland to collect billions of euros in back taxes after it was decided the Irish government had offered preferential tax deals -- something illegal under E.U. law.

September 2018 saw Apple pay the entire 13.1 billion euro outstanding balance of its disputed taxes to Ireland. Both the company and the Irish government are working to appeal the 2016 ruling.

Australia's tax office audited Apple in 2015, but no severe consequences appear to have followed.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 5
    jungmarkjungmark Posts: 6,647member
    If the law has loophole or is badly written, blame those who wrote/pass/signed the law. 
    mattinozwatto_cobralolliver
  • Reply 2 of 5
    entropysentropys Posts: 1,558member
    I suspect it is an AirPod led rise in revenue. They’re everywhere.
    Surprisingly large numbers of Apple watches, despite Apple not bothering with US features like heart monitoring. That would require allocation of resources in our expensive to employ people/pick your way through the regulatory maze cesspit.
    iPhones are the default phone for corporations. Outside the workplace, especially the young, they are in decline.
    ipads were under threat from surface pros for a while, but there seems a swing back lately with the lower priced iPad.
    Macs on the other hand, have been priced into rarity compared with HPs and Dells. They seem a lot less common.

    that would be my observations.  A peripheral led rise in revenue.

    also: the Age doesnt employ any journalists that understand tax. They just deal in envy and are on a typical Marxist jihad that plagues most journalism these days. So TBH what was once possibly the most respected paper in the country has declined over over the last thirty years to become a pathetic subsidiary of a television station. I don’t trust them.
    SpamSandwich
  • Reply 3 of 5
    jungmark said:
    If the law has loophole or is badly written, blame those who wrote/pass/signed the law. 
    Yes we have a bunch of knuckle heads who did all of that and more in parliament, just look at how many prime ministers we have had in recent years.😉
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 5
    tbornottbornot Posts: 106member
    Lower taxes always leads to higher revenue.  Socialists never understand this, but rich countries have low tax rates.
    SpamSandwichentropys
  • Reply 5 of 5
    tbornot said:
    Lower taxes always leads to higher revenue.  Socialists never understand this, but rich countries have low tax rates.
    Sure, because they’re a better investment for individuals and businesses. If the US committed to the so-called “FairTax” we’d be the envy of the world.
Sign In or Register to comment.