The three evolutions of Apple aqua

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
How clunky it looked back then! (The website images are early 2000, May 2002, and present)















[ 02-16-2003: Message edited by: MajorMatt ]</p>

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 8
    Looks better now... more simple.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 8
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    Yeah, much better now.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 8
    ast3r3xast3r3x Posts: 5,012member
    it has a cleaner and sharper look
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 8
    I miss the shiny blue apple on the first tab...but the grey one is more discreet. <img src="graemlins/hmmm.gif" border="0" alt="[Hmmm]" />
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 8
    stunnedstunned Posts: 1,096member
    I prefer the blue one.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 8
    My My Aqua, how you've grown! <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> Actually, the tabs got shorter but, whatever. What we were salavating over 3 years ago, now looks tacky and unrefined.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 8
    Someone really should put up something like a history page of OS X, with screenshots of 10.1, 10.0, the Public Beta, and the Rhapsody DP and DR builds...like the AppleFritter page on A/UX.



    Funny how far Aqua has come. It's not that bad, really...at least it doesn't seem as bad as other people made it out to be when OS X first hit the streets.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 8
    cosmonutcosmonut Posts: 4,872member
    iReview. <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> That lasted, what, two months?



    I think the current apple should be a shiny, silvery apple like they have on the front of the displays, or something similar. Otherwise, it is much nicer than it was.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.