Apple Card expected to earn Apple $1B annually with minimal risk to Apple
Apple Card could earn Apple $1 billion dollars in revenue within a few years of its launch, analysis of the upcoming credit card suggests, with the service likely to be "almost pure profit" to the iPhone maker while partner Goldman Sachs handles the vast majority of the risk and its operation.
Arriving this summer in the United States, Apple Card aims to offer consumers an easy-to-use credit card that is managed through their iPhone. The card offers a variety of benefits, including competitive interest rates, a lack of fees, features to help customers avoid debt or pay it down faster, and same-day usage after acceptance, which may make the card an extremely attractive proposition for iPhone users.
According to estimates from Alliance Bernstein seen by Business Insider, Apple Card may not necessarily offer the greatest potential revenue compared to other services announced at the same time, such as Apple News+, Apple TV+, and Apple Arcade. However, it is suggested that Apple Card may be a highly profitable project for the company with relatively little effort or risk on Apple's part.
Despite not charging fees, the card will earn money from transaction fees and interest from consumer balances. As with other co-branded cards, Apple will take a percentage of these revenues for itself, but while the number is usually in the range of 5% to 10%, it may be higher for Apple due to being a premium brand, Goldman Sachs being new to the credit card business in general, and Apple's work to integrate Apple Card with the Wallet.
"The split is likely more in favor of Apple given its relative negotiating leverage over Goldman Sachs," the report advises. It was revealed on Tuesday that Goldman Sachs faced competition from Barclays, Synchrony, JP Morgan Chase, and Citigroup, with the latter thought to have pulled out of the running over the potential lack of profits available to it.
In terms of revenue, it is estimated the two largest rewards cards available at the moment, Amex Premium and Chase Sapphire Reserve, each draw in somewhere in the region of $4 billion in annual revenue. Apple Card has the potential to reach this level, due to the "brand cachet" and the large number of iPhone owners who could use the facility.
It is estimated there will be 935 million iPhones in use globally by the end of 2019, giving it a considerable potential customer base if it does somehow go international with Apple Card, but for the moment the catchment pool will be far less.
While US consumers are generally wealthier than other markets, the card's instant cash-back and 2% cash-back rate for digital purchases is thought could appeal to low and middle-income earners.
Bernstein thinks Apple could earn $1 billion annually from Apple Card within three to five years if all goes well, though earnings in the "hundreds of millions" is more likely.
More beneficial to Apple is that this is revenue with minimal risk or effort required on its part, aside from integrating the functionality. As Goldman Sachs is effectively paying Apple to access its customer base, and is handling all operations, managing credit exposure, collecting bills, and dealing with customers, this "should be almost pure profit to Apple," the analysts believe.
Arriving this summer in the United States, Apple Card aims to offer consumers an easy-to-use credit card that is managed through their iPhone. The card offers a variety of benefits, including competitive interest rates, a lack of fees, features to help customers avoid debt or pay it down faster, and same-day usage after acceptance, which may make the card an extremely attractive proposition for iPhone users.
According to estimates from Alliance Bernstein seen by Business Insider, Apple Card may not necessarily offer the greatest potential revenue compared to other services announced at the same time, such as Apple News+, Apple TV+, and Apple Arcade. However, it is suggested that Apple Card may be a highly profitable project for the company with relatively little effort or risk on Apple's part.
Despite not charging fees, the card will earn money from transaction fees and interest from consumer balances. As with other co-branded cards, Apple will take a percentage of these revenues for itself, but while the number is usually in the range of 5% to 10%, it may be higher for Apple due to being a premium brand, Goldman Sachs being new to the credit card business in general, and Apple's work to integrate Apple Card with the Wallet.
"The split is likely more in favor of Apple given its relative negotiating leverage over Goldman Sachs," the report advises. It was revealed on Tuesday that Goldman Sachs faced competition from Barclays, Synchrony, JP Morgan Chase, and Citigroup, with the latter thought to have pulled out of the running over the potential lack of profits available to it.
In terms of revenue, it is estimated the two largest rewards cards available at the moment, Amex Premium and Chase Sapphire Reserve, each draw in somewhere in the region of $4 billion in annual revenue. Apple Card has the potential to reach this level, due to the "brand cachet" and the large number of iPhone owners who could use the facility.
It is estimated there will be 935 million iPhones in use globally by the end of 2019, giving it a considerable potential customer base if it does somehow go international with Apple Card, but for the moment the catchment pool will be far less.
While US consumers are generally wealthier than other markets, the card's instant cash-back and 2% cash-back rate for digital purchases is thought could appeal to low and middle-income earners.
Bernstein thinks Apple could earn $1 billion annually from Apple Card within three to five years if all goes well, though earnings in the "hundreds of millions" is more likely.
More beneficial to Apple is that this is revenue with minimal risk or effort required on its part, aside from integrating the functionality. As Goldman Sachs is effectively paying Apple to access its customer base, and is handling all operations, managing credit exposure, collecting bills, and dealing with customers, this "should be almost pure profit to Apple," the analysts believe.
Comments
"More beneficial to Apple is that this is revenue with minimal risk or effort required on its part, aside from integrating the functionality. As Goldman Sachs is effectively paying Apple to access its customer base, and is handling all operations, managing credit exposure, collecting bills, and dealing with customers, this "should be almost pure profit to Apple," the analysts believe."
↑↑ That should scare the living tish out of anyone applying for one of these cards. If the analyst is accurate, Apple gets paid a ton with little risk. Yaaaaaaay. Yaaaaaaaay. Our favorite company gets to make more money. Yaaaaay (not really sure why, but Yaaaay anyway). You howerver, Mr or Ms Cardholder, you get to deal with Goldman Sachs, a company with a proven history of financial responsibility and regard for their customers well being. ← tee hee. Hopefully they're no longer the Goldman Sach we've come to know an love. ← tee hee.
Make good financial decisions people.
Aside from an incident many years ago in which my credit chard was charged about $30 from a bar in Texas and was probably caused by a keying error in which they happened to get the check digit correct and a credit card stolen from my daughter's house (and for which the credit card company caught the fraud immediately and called me), I've never had any fraud over decades until recently. Aside from having numerous credit cards automatically replaced due to massive data breaches and/or security flaws at the scanners in retail, two of my credit cards have had fraudulent purchases made recently, mostly in China. These purchases were immediately caught by the credit card companies who contacted me as soon as the purchases were made, but I'm still puzzled how my credit card account numbers with the 3-digit number on the back became available to someone else. I think CNP (Card not present) fraud is a threat to the entire credit card system.
On a slightly related note, I get those crazy "I've hacked your account and have videos of you watching porn" ransom emails every day. Some of them come with an old password of mine. Notably, they're always passwords that I haven't used in years, so they must have come from old data breaches. One password was used with a small publisher of music directories and I just figured that being such a small company, their website or database wasn't secure enough, but the others are more puzzling. Since those are passwords that I no longer use, I don't know what sites I used them on because I don't keep a record of most old passwords.
The big NYC retailer B&H is offering their own new credit card that refunds the amount of the sales tax. But the interest rate is 30%, so someone would be a fool not to make sure they immediately pay off the entire amount before the first due date. For them (or their bank) to break even on the card, the average person would have to hold a balance for about 4 months and I can't see that happening. But for big purchases, like a Mac or a camera, one can save several hundred dollars and that's far more than the rebate that the Apple Card would provide. But this B&H "Payboo" card is only good for purchases at B&H.
Tim Cook: Minimal Risk
However, given the past behaviour of Goldman Sachs, they may simply have thought "We'll just bleed the suckers dry to make up for the reduced top line."
I'm sure most users already have a credit card and they didn't pee their pants. Luckily Apple shares less data than the cards in my wallet.
Thanks for the laughs.