Deal for Sprint & T-Mobile merger could turn Dish into a new wireless carrier

Posted:
in iPhone
Dish, T-Mobile, and the U.S. Department of Justice are reportedly near a compromise deal for T-Mobile's proposed merger with Sprint, which if completed, would see Dish become a national wireless carrier.

Dish TV


Under proposed terms, Dish would be able to use the combined Sprint/T-Mobile network for six or seven years before switching to its own, CNBC said on Tuesday, citing sources. One alleged point of conflict however is that T-Mobile wants to limit Dish's spectrum capacity to 12.5%. Another is that T-Mobile's majority owner -- Deutsche Telekom -- wants any strategic Dish investor capped at a 5% stake.

Sprint and T-Mobile have imposed their own July 29 deadline on the $26.5 billion merger, and already promised to sacrifice Sprint's Boost Mobile prepaid brand, as well as commit to a three-year 5G network expansion without hiking prices in the interim. That's not believed to be enough for the DoJ, given concerns that the national carrier pool might shrink from four to three.

Dish was already rumored to be ready to pay $6 billion or more for assets, including Boost and wireless spectrum. At the moment the company operates as a satellite TV provider and the parent of internet streamer Sling TV.

In mid-June, Dish chairman Charlie Ergen reportedly met with Federal Communications Commission chairman Ajit Pai and DoJ antitrust head Makan Delrahim in order to persuade them of the necessity of four national wireless carriers for the sake of competition.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 6
    n2itivguyn2itivguy Posts: 68member
    Three’s Just fine. Heck, one’s fine so long as they wouldn’t abuse their market position. 
  • Reply 2 of 6
    n2itivguy said:
    Three’s Just fine. Heck, one’s fine so long as they wouldn’t abuse their market position. 
    "so long as". Sure, name one company that has a quasi monopoly and doesn't abuse it. Can't think of one? Yeah, neither can I.
    ronnjbdragon
  • Reply 3 of 6
    Aren’t 3 strong carriers better than 2 strong carriers and 2 weak carriers?
    redraider11SoundJudgment
  • Reply 4 of 6
    Aren’t 3 strong carriers better than 2 strong carriers and 2 weak carriers?
    Bingo!!
    applesnoranges
  • Reply 5 of 6
    n2itivguy said:
    Three’s Just fine. Heck, one’s fine so long as they wouldn’t abuse their market position. 
    "so long as". Sure, name one company that has a quasi monopoly and doesn't abuse it. Can't think of one? Yeah, neither can I.
    Straw man. Doesn’t mean what I said is false. There are some in this world that don’t see profit and power as motivators to allow corruption or abuse of position to be the endgame. 
  • Reply 6 of 6
    ronnronn Posts: 333member
    Hobbling a combined T-Mobile and Sprint while DISH is allowed to leech off of the New T-Mobile for 5+ years is insane. Allow the damn merger without this nonsense. Verizon and AT&T need a better armed competitor.

    If DISH doesn't start its own network on its own next year (they've been warned and are sitting on billion$ of assets), it'll suffer penalties from the FCC. Let any fines/penalties/forfeited spectrum be used to create another national network and increased competition.
Sign In or Register to comment.