Ring pauses data sharing practices, promises more privacy controls

Posted:
in General Discussion
After criticism, Amazon's Ring is hitting pause on its practice of sharing data with third parties in an effort to boost the amount of control users have over their privacy.

Ring appears to be making an effort toward giving users more control over their data privacy.
Ring appears to be making an effort toward giving users more control over their data privacy.


In January, researchers at The Electronic Frontier Foundation discovered that Ring's Android app was spying on users and sending that data to analytics and marketing firms like Facebook, Google and MixPanel.

After that report, Ring promised to give users more control over their data through a new privacy dashboard and other transparency efforts. This week, in a statement to Engadget, Ring announced that it has stopped sharing data with third-party firms.

"We have temporarily paused the use of most third-party analytics services in the Ring apps and website while we work on providing users with more abilities to opt-out in Control Center," the spokesperson said.

Starting sometime this week, Ring users will also be able to explicitly opt-out of sharing data that would be used to serve personalized ads. In the wake of the EFF report, Ring also added the ability to opt-out of police video requests.

And later in the spring, the Amazon-owned doorbell company says it will "provide customers with additional options to limit sharing information with third-party service providers."

While it hasn't been confirmed whether the Ring for iOS app contains as many third-party trackers, privacy and security advocates still have concerns about many facets of the platform.

In the past, Ring employees have abused "highly privileged" access to customer feeds and the company itself reportedly has deep ties to law enforcement. In December 2019, Motherboard found that there were serious concerns about Ring's cybersecurity practices.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 5
    Far too little. Far too late.

    Amazon won't like to lose such a valuable source of data. I'm sure that they'll find another way to get it.
    dysamoriaDogpersonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 5
    StrangeDaysStrangeDays Posts: 12,877member
    Oh how nice. imagine, doing what people would have expected from the start. 

    never trust data-miners with your privacy. 
    edited March 2020 chasmdysamoriaDogpersonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 5
    Oh how nice. imagine, doing what people would have expected from the start. 

    never trust data-miners with your privacy. 
    What?! Who cares about privacy when these things are so inexpensive?!

    /s
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 5
    chasmchasm Posts: 3,296member
    Amazon (like Google, FB, Twitter, et al) have zero interest in your privacy, a strong monetary incentive to collect data from you on levels you're not even imagining, and sell it to absolutely anyone. Anything they say that claims anything other than that is a PR move (like Facebook does -- promises to fix a problem and then just doesn't).

    We need cripplingly expensive fines and jail time for the execs that foster this lack of respect for privacy.
    dysamoriaDogpersonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 5
    dysamoriadysamoria Posts: 3,430member
    “Pauses”. What a solution. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha... 
    Dogpersonwatto_cobra
Sign In or Register to comment.