Here's when users can expect App Store privacy nutrition labels

Posted:
in General Discussion
Apple will start requiring developers to include information for App Store privacy "nutrition labels" on Dec. 8. Here's what that means for users.

Credit: Apple
Credit: Apple


The privacy information, first announced as an iOS 14 feature in June, will be displayed on an app's App Store page. The goal, Apple says, is to increase the transparency around what kinds of data an app collects, and what happens to that data.

What the nutrition labels will show

Basically, the privacy information is a short and prominent overview of the types of data that an app collects, and what that data is used for.

For example, if an app or an associated third party collects names, email addresses, physical addresses, or payment information from a user, that data will be displayed on an App Store listing.

Similarly, developers will need to let users know how they or a third party use the data. Some of those usage categories include analytics, product personalization, or third-party targeted advertising.

A full list of the data types and usage categories is available here.

These disclosures must also be updated if privacy or data policies change. Apple says that developers are responsible for keeping the responses accurate and up to date. All disclosures and responses must also comply with Apple's App Store guidelines.

When users can expect the nutrition labels

As far as when users can start expecting the privacy nutrition labels to show up, that might take some time.

Apple will begin requiring developers to submit privacy information with new apps or app updates on Tuesday, Dec. 8. However, in a developer update Friday, Apple noted that existing apps will remain available to download.

What that means is that apps that are frequently updated will start showing privacy information sooner than others. Less frequently updated or abandoned apps, on the other hand, may not display that data as soon -- or at all. Beyond the Dec. 8 requirement for app updates, the company also hasn't set a hard deadline requiring all apps to have that information.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 7
    narwhalnarwhal Posts: 118member
    This is great for developers running ads who never update their apps. But for developers who update their apps regularly, their apps will appear to App Store customers as more intrusive and dangerous. Apple should add information to older apps too stating that their privacy settings are undetermined due to the age of the app.
    williamlondondewmewatto_cobrafrantisek
  • Reply 2 of 7
    mcdavemcdave Posts: 1,927member
    I’d like to see 1st-party framework adoption ‘nutrition’ labels. Or warnings for apps which heavily rely on 3rd-party frameworks.
    n2itivguywatto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 7
    fred1fred1 Posts: 1,108member
    narwhal said:
    This is great for developers running ads who never update their apps. But for developers who update their apps regularly, their apps will appear to App Store customers as more intrusive and dangerous. Apple should add information to older apps too stating that their privacy settings are undetermined due to the age of the app.
    I agree. I don’t understand why some apps are exempt. 
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 7
    Apple will probably postpone this requirement just like every other before it.
    williamlondon
  • Reply 5 of 7
    mike1mike1 Posts: 3,273member
    fred1 said:
    narwhal said:
    This is great for developers running ads who never update their apps. But for developers who update their apps regularly, their apps will appear to App Store customers as more intrusive and dangerous. Apple should add information to older apps too stating that their privacy settings are undetermined due to the age of the app.
    I agree. I don’t understand why some apps are exempt. 
    Because you have to start somewhere. I would think that this will eventually lead to another purge of the app store, like was done a few years back for some technical requirement. Maybe it was the 32 bit to 64 bit changeover.

    watto_cobrafrantisek
  • Reply 6 of 7
    GeorgeBMacGeorgeBMac Posts: 11,421member
    This could be a model for a national law.

    But first, consumers would need actual education on what online privacy and how violating that privacy can affect them.

    But, industry will fight both measures tooth and nail using the tried & true technique first pioneered by the tobacco industry:  spread doubt and confusion.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 7 of 7
    This could be a model for a national law.

    But first, consumers would need actual education on what online privacy and how violating that privacy can affect them.

    But, industry will fight both measures tooth and nail using the tried & true technique first pioneered by the tobacco industry:  spread doubt and confusion.

    It is not easy task. From number of my discussions with Android users or illiterate users I can say that many of them simply do not care even you explain them.  Some even find personalized adds as welcomed feature. In some way it can be seen like that,

    I think all this privacy focused changes could give more value back to specialized magazines and websites where desired public for adds is coming. When you shouting out laser sharp campaign on Facebook wont be working that well in future. hopefully.
Sign In or Register to comment.