hmmmm- I would have thought that they would be using powerbooks with gl2's and apples QT broadcaster or something. I didn't think it was that primative- I guess don't fix whats not broken.
They only have obscenely limited bandwidth to work with, the satellite phone technology is stuck in the stone age. We are basically talking about 1960's technology that has been miniaturized.
They probably have reasonable equipment for the stationary brodcasts, but when they are just bombing around in the back of a tank they are limited to modem over satellite phone
As I understood it the idea behind the videophone is that it does not require a satellite link, and that it's really small and can be run by just one person with no set up. It might not look great but I don't think there is anything else that is cheap, small, and easy to take its place at this time.
CNN and others normally use g4 powerbooks to edit news reports in the field but in Iraq they had to give them up because there are no Apple service areas in the Middle East. Also the powerbooks are not as durable as Panasonic toughbooks. (they should just use 14" iBooks but I guess they don't have PC card slots). wired.com had an article a couple of weeks ago on this subject.
Video phones I believe do require a satellite uplink but all the equipment can be carried in a suitcase. The fees are very steep at 1.50 per minute for uplink time.
Supposibly it costs the networks millions of dollars a day to provide the constant live coverage, especially since they do not run commercials.
Comments
"E-war" coverage depends on working technology - Mar 9, 2003 - CNN
keyword searches for some of the tools will help
first try
first link is a winner, complete with prices Videophone Technology
They probably have reasonable equipment for the stationary brodcasts, but when they are just bombing around in the back of a tank they are limited to modem over satellite phone
Video phones I believe do require a satellite uplink but all the equipment can be carried in a suitcase. The fees are very steep at 1.50 per minute for uplink time.
Supposibly it costs the networks millions of dollars a day to provide the constant live coverage, especially since they do not run commercials.