Final Cut Pro for Mac and Final Cut Pro for iPad 2 have grossly different features

Posted:
in Mac Software

Alongside the launch of the new iPad Air and iPad Pro lineups, Apple showed off updates to Final Cut Pro for iPad and macOS -- but they do not have the same feature set. Here are the key differences, and things to watch out for.

A MacBook Pro and iPad displaying Final Cut Pro video editing software with timelines, clips, and audio editing features, showcasing a man singing into a microphone.
Apple's new Final Cut Pro for iPad 2 and Final Cut Pro 10.8.



Final Cut Pro for iPad 2 is a major shift in the use of the iPad editing tool, while Final Cut Pro 10.8 is a modest upgrade. The result is two different tools with different tools, sharing the same name.

While competitors have added many AI and workflow improvement tools, such as transcript-based editing, advanced subject tracking and masking, and more, to their desktop versions, Apple seems to focus most of its effort on the iPad version.

To determine which app -- or if both apps -- are right for you, it's key to walk through the history of the apps, their differences, and, more importantly, their unique strengths.

Apple's awkward naming decision is a problem for users



I've been using Final Cut Pro for years -- first exclusively and now as one of the tools in my editing arsenal -- and, like many users, have been hoping for major updates. I also use the iPad version and appreciate updates, but they are increasingly becoming two different tools.

iPad displaying Final Cut Pro video editing app interface with a project timeline, colorful graphics thumbnails, and a person dancing in a clip.
Final Cut Pro for iPad both is and isn't the same as the Mac version.



Final Cut Pro for iPad 2 adds new features that take the mobile app in a much different direction than the Mac version. The iPad version now features mobile capture that would be difficult to achieve on the Mac.

In other words, Final Cut Pro for iPad and Final Cut Pro for desktop are two different video editing systems that share the same name but have different audiences and features.

Adobe avoided this problem by labeling the mobile-only version of Premiere "Premiere Rush." It might have made sense if Apple dropped Pro from the iPad version instead of tacking iPad onto the end of the name.

BlackMagic's DaVinci Resolve video editing suite took a different approach than Adobe or Apple by making the iPad version as close to the desktop version as possible.

The iPad version of Resolve lacks some desktop features, but it is incredibly similar, mostly a scaled-back variant that addresses different user interface experiences.

Tablet displaying Resolve video editing software for iPad with colorful graphs and clips on a wooden desk, beside a coffee cup, earphones, and a stylus.
BlackMagic's DaVininci Resolve for iPad is a faithful copy of the desktop version



Processing power likely contributes to the features the iPad version of Resolve lacks, so it will be interesting to see how the new M4 iPad Pro affects development.

History and development of Final Cut Pro and Final Cut Pro for iPad



Final Cut Pro (FCP) has been part of Apple's flagship professional creator tools for over two decades, but it only came to the iPad in May 2023. Almost a year later, Apple has just released Final Cut Pro for iPad 2.

During the same product launch as Final Cut Pro for iPad 2, Apple also announced that Final Cut Pro for Mac would be updated from version 10.7 to 10.8. As the point release indicates, this update doesn't include changes to the core functionality but adds some AI-driven features.

Final Cut Pro for iPad did not offer feature parity with the Mac version at its launch. The discrepancy between the two was not particularly surprising. FCP is a massively complex program with decades of development and uses significant processing horsepower to produce feature-length projects.

Apple is capitalizing on these differences and is using the iPad version to showcase the power of devices like the M4 iPad Pro. However, the different naming conventions and lack of a clear comparison guide can be confusing.

At the risk of being overly simplistic, it's good to think of Final Cut Pro for iPad as a solution for the mobile-specific editor. Final Cut Pro for Mac is a tool for more advanced video editing. The type of content being created should be a guide as to which version to use.

Hardware differences drive different capabilities



Before discussing the software differences, it's important to note that the launch of Final Cut Pro for iPad 2 showcases the power of the iPad Pro and the advantages of an all-in-one mobile device.

iPad displaying Final Cut Pro video editing software with a music band performance on the timeline and title graphics options on the right.
Apple's Final Cut Pro for iPad 2 takes advantage of the new iPad Pro capabilities.



The new iPad Pro features a cutting-edge screen that Apple calls Tandem OLED. By sandwiching two OLED panels together, the new iPad Pro has an outstanding range of colors.

The new iPad Pro's color fidelity is remarkable for video editors. The display faithfully reproduces standard dynamic range (SDR) and High Dynamic Range (HDR) content.

As the name implies, SDR content is designed for playback on traditional monitors and TVs, while the wider range of colors in HDR content requires more advanced displays, like those in the iPad Pro, the iPhone Pro, and many 4K TVs.

The problem with HDR displays is that you need one to adjust colors and evaluate playback. Stand-alone HDR displays can be expensive, but the iPad Pro satisfies both needs. The new iPad Pro can evaluate HDR footage since the iPad can be used as a secondary display for the Mac.

Final Cut Pro for iPad vs. Final Cut Pro for Mac



It's best to discuss the basic differences between the two platforms to understand the growing differences between Final Cut Pro for iPad 2 and Final Cut Pro for Mac.

It's easiest to start by discussing what Final Cut Pro for iPad is missing relative to the Mac version, as the omissions are more noticeable than the similarities.

Organization



FCP for Mac organizes work in libraries that can hold events and projects. The larger library is a core organizational tool. The library system allows editors to make different silos for things like clients, jobs, or users.

Final Cut Pro editing on a Mac with multiple clips of a man talking.
Final Cut Pro for Mac has a different set of tools from FCP for iPad



Libraries, in turn, can contain events and are most often used to organize specific shoots. An event can then contain clips or projects. A project is a single editing session, essentially a single timeline.

The library, event, and project system allows for easy job portability. Any other FCP Mac user can open a Library, which can contain all the original footage for simplicity and efficiency.

I can still access any Final Cut Pro Library I've used and start working without hunting for drives or footage because I archived them all as media-containing libraries.

FCP for iPad only has projects, and since the desktop organization is based on libraries, it's impossible to open a library on the iPad version. This eliminates cross-platform and cross-user collaboration when using the iPad version.

Importing and working with content



FCP for iPad has a similar number of sources used for import but some unique limitations. Media can be imported from internal storage, an externally connected drive, iCloud Drive, and a media card connected by an external reader. However, you can't import a range of files; it's all or nothing.

The ability to import from the internal camera is unique to the iPad version (and radically improved with the latest update). Final Cut Pro for iPad's mobile capture functionality is its defining feature and the direction in which Apple will continue to move.

Starting with the M2 models, the iPad version of Final Cut Pro can be captured in Apple's high-quality ProRes format, which the iPhone is also capable of. [https://appleinsider.com/inside/iphone-15-pro/tips/how-to-get-the-best-video-capture-possible-on-iphone-15-pro-with-prores]

Color management



Final Cut Pro for iPad 2 has gained some color adjustment tools, but it still lags behind Final Cut Pro. Color adjustment in the iPad version is similar to color adjustment in Photos.

You can manually adjust color with sliders, use a color grading preset (think enhancing highlights or applying a tint to shadows), or add a "color effect," which is essentially a filter.

The Mac version has more professional color matching and adjustment tools suitable for TV and cinema productions. Users can also use plug-ins and filters to adjust colors more specifically.

Screen of a iPad showing Final Cut Pro video editing app interface with a timeline, clips, soundtracks, and playback controls.

Audio editing



Final Cut Pro for Mac has powerful audio tools, and editors can work with dialog and effects. However, Final Cut Pro for iPad has more limited audio capabilities but boasts some excellent features.

Any clip can be assigned to dialog, effects, or music, while the desktop version can make subtitles or edit the names of roles.

The iPad version has ducking, adjusting multiple clips simultaneously, panning, fading, noise removal, and isolation effects to clean up tracks. The Mac's ability to run plug-ins for audio effects is missing.

Final Cut Pro for iPad 2 and Final Cut Pro for Mac part ways



In the first version of Final Cut Pro for iPad, multicam support was limited compared to the Mac version. In Final Cut Pro for iPad 2, Multicam support received radical improvements. It is the center of the iPad version's future development and the platform split's start.

Laptop screen displaying Final Cut Pro 10.8 video editing software with various color correction controls and a scene of a room with lamps.
One of the minor changes in FCP 10.8 is the ability to add custom Inspector names.



FCP for Mac users have been hoping for a significant upgrade to their editing tool as Final Cut Pro has begun to fall behind competitors. There's been an uptick in YouTube videos about people switching from Final Cut Pro to Resolve and Premiere.

Version 10.8 adds many quality-of-life improvements and "Leverag[es] the Neural Engine in Apple Silicon" to support AI-based enhancements.

FCP 10.8 enhances support for HDR, RAW, and LOG workflows and can now improve color, color balance, and exposure settings with a single click. Think of this as the Photos enhancement button coming to the video.

The program also gains Smooth Slo-Mo, which uses AI to create smooth motion in clips recorded at normal speed, eliminating jerkiness.

Color correction and events can be dragged from the inspector onto clips to apply them without repeating settings, and a new timeline index allows editors to find clips with missing media to repair projects quickly.

And that, largely, is all for the desktop updates. There's enough to show that Apple is working on the program, but more is needed to justify a full version upgrade.

I suspect the next major update to Final Cut Pro will happen sometime after Apple's OS updates bring more advanced AI features to the ecosystem.

Final Cut Pro for iPad gets a new direction for mobile creators



Final Cut Pro for iPad 2 and the release of Final Cut Camera have made the mobile editor a mobile capture tool, with the addition of powerful multicam features.

This functionality finally gives me a reason to upgrade to the mobile version, and it will also make the mobile version more useful for other creators.

Over-the-shoulder view of a person recording a piano performance on an iPad.
A video creator using Multicam to capture various angles thanks to FCP for iPad 2



Up to four devices (iPhone or iPad) can be connected wirelessly to create one multicam stream, and the settings of each camera can be adjusted from the central editing iPad. Directors can change settings like exposure, focus, and zoom on the fly through the Final Cut for iPad 2 Interface.

Multicam is used occasionally in television production and, to a certain degree, in cinema production. With the support of iPhones and iPads as capture devices, Apple is looking to pioneer a new multicam project.

I believe that the drive here is for streaming content and YouTube development, where channels are getting increasingly sophisticated yet might not have (or want) dedicated editing teams.

With ProRes support already in the iPhone and iPad and the manual controls provided by Final Cut Camera, anyone can suddenly build and edit a multi-camera shoot using nothing more than the gear in their pockets.

Less than a decade ago, Sony, Canon, and others released a stream of compact cameras with built-in webcam abilities, image stabilization, pro-audio support, and advanced color-management tools to help a new generation of creators.

These small creator-focused cameras tackled a problem the smaller content channels faced: making footage that looks as good as possible to capture eyes and subscribers on YouTube, TikTok, and elsewhere.

To my mind, Final Cut Pro for iPad was developed with the same realization that drove the pivot in camera strategy. There's still a market for a truly professional video editing tool, but online content creators are the new core customer base.

Where does Final Cut Pro go from here



To my mind, Final Cut Pro for iPhone and Final Cut Pro for Mac have two possible trajectories.

The most likely scenario is that Apple keeps adding specialization to each platform and continues to leverage the strengths of the Final Cut Pro ecosystem to integrate both.

In this scenario, Final Cut Pro for iPad will eventually look less like its Mac predecessor and more like its own tool. By going in different directions, the naming choice becomes even more problematic.

iPhone on tripod capturing a climber ascending an indoor rock wall, displayed on screen, with colorful holds in blurred background.
The new Final Cut Camera in use on a rock climbing shoot.



This possible future could be right around the corner. Rumors of on-device AI being a major push for Apple starting with iOS 18 and macOS 15, to be announced at the upcoming WWDC event, suggest that the functionality of these video tools could take a sudden leap forward.

AI tools in Final Cut Pro would allow it to at least catch up to rivals in some fundamentally important ways, to the relief of diehard Final Cut Pro users.

The second possibility is that eventually, Final Cut Pro for iPad will absorb the Mac version, bringing feature parity to the mobile version and then some.

This alternate future feels less likely, but there are reasons to suspect it might be the eventual path. Apple's iPad event focused heavily on the power of the iPad Pro and its ability to operate as fast as many Macs.

With competitors' headstart in next-generation AI-based editing tools for desktops, it might be advantageous for Apple to create an iPad-centric future where its strengths lie.

However implausible this might seem, just a few Apple events ago, Apple produced the whole launch video using the iPhone 15 Pro, and it used Final Cut Pro's chief rival, DaVinci Resolve, to perform all of the editing.

Which Final Cut Pro should I use?



Fortunately, there's an easy answer to which Final Cut Pro is the right choice: Both are. Just as there are tasks best tackled with an iPad and others best tackled on the Mac, the same is true with Final Cut Pro.

By branching Final Cut Pro into different products that integrate well, any user can use either version of Final Cut Pro, depending on needs. The new Final Cut Camera and Final Cut Pro for iPad 2 open up new content creation capabilities and provide creators with new video editing tools, and that doesn't look like it's going to change.

Now if Apple could just sort out its naming issues.



Read on AppleInsider

FileMakerFeller

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 13
    ducarmurducarmur Posts: 5member
    I don't get it!

    Of course there will be a difference from the desktop version vs. iPad version regardless of "naming".

    There are so many desktop programs I wish I could fully utilize on an iPad but it seems I need a keyboard mouse, etc....but the Apple Pencil is bring things closer.

    The iPad is moving closer but this article is just nonsense!

    Use Final Cut on a Mac for you task and/or use Final Cut for the iPad.

    Am I missing something here?

    And if I have offended anyone, you have my apologies.

    I just wish for real, creative and well thought dissection of news.

    JUST DO NOT WRITE FOR THE SAKE OF WRITING.

    Love you all!
    Oferwilliamlondon40domi9secondkox2
  • Reply 2 of 13
    JamesCudeJamesCude Posts: 52member
    Totally agree this story is word salad in search of controversy…
    40domi9secondkox2spheric
  • Reply 3 of 13
    I agree the naming makes it confusing although i wonder if the education creative bundle includes the new iPad version? This would make it cheaper to just get that bundle then two separate fcp 
  • Reply 4 of 13
    elijahgelijahg Posts: 2,780member
    What professional editor is going to awkwardly edit anything of note on an iPad, when they could do the same thing on a Mac with keyboard and mouse in 10% of the time? FCP on iPad is just Apple's way of saying "we can" without thinking whether "we should". Everyone is well aware that iPad's hardware is lightning fast, but unfortunately that just means it's light years ahead of iPadOS. Work on the OS, not the apps.
    edited May 10 muthuk_vanalingampaisleydisco40domi
  • Reply 5 of 13
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,041member
    What's the problem use the iPad version for minor editing on short form video?
    edited May 10 40domi
  • Reply 6 of 13
    I am just sooo glad I did not get dissected for my comment by social media.

    Thanks......

    However, what if apple designed a monitor that functions with the Apple Pen Pro?

    Think of the convenience and familiarity with the touch of the iPad's screen.

    Just a crazy thought as Apple has abstained from touch screen Macs.

    edited May 10 9secondkox2
  • Reply 7 of 13
    yawn!

    The world is going mobile and Apple is trying to stay ahead. However the risk is... FCP for Mac is still the best and fastest way. 


    9secondkox2
  • Reply 8 of 13
    sloaahsloaah Posts: 26member
    If the two suites aren’t fully cross-compatible then that’s a major issue and they shouldn’t have the same name. I would expect to be able to open a Mac FCP project on iPad, but at the moment I can only import it in the other direction. 

    Personally I hope the iPad version begins to grow closer to the Mac version, since I see Apple being much more active about FCP for iOS development than they are with the Mac side, which has been relatively stagnant for a while. Long term I’m sure they plan for a FCP for Vision Pro - in which case feature parity between Mac and iOS versions becomes more important. 
    9secondkox2FileMakerFeller
  • Reply 9 of 13
    40domi40domi Posts: 135member
    When launched last year FCP for the iPad was a different version of the Mac Version, didn't see any articles about the naming then, why is it a big issue now?
    Although I do agree, the iPad version should have a different name, as it's a different product, for all the wrong reasons I may add
    9secondkox2
  • Reply 10 of 13
    9secondkox29secondkox2 Posts: 2,832member
    Apple is probably trying to justify an eternal subscription for Final Cut on iPad. 

    I’ve had Final Cut Pro on Mac for years. I don’t mind if they charge $50 one time to add the new ai features. 

    Would be worth it. 

    If apple goes subscription on Mac I think Final Cut dies. 

    But if they do incremental updates with worthwhile features, I don’t think Anybody has an issue paying $50 for the addition every 2-3 years or so. 
  • Reply 11 of 13
    9secondkox29secondkox2 Posts: 2,832member

    yawn!

    The world is going mobile and Apple is trying to stay ahead. However the risk is... FCP for Mac is still the best and fastest way. 


    It’s interesting. I think the world WAS going mobile. Now, mobile is still huge, but people are returning to notebooks and even desktops to get work done in the most focused and efficient way. 

    Even my creative interns, a bunch of 20-25 year olds are doing everything on their laptops including Instagram posting. 

    I think we reached another inflection point. Mobile was new and “cool” but now folks are past the honeymoon phase and rediscovering the original wheel so to speak. I think the notebook/desktop paradigm is already coming back - especially for heavily creative endeavors such as filmmaking, video editing, motion graphics, and even graphic design. 
    edited May 11
  • Reply 12 of 13
    9secondkox29secondkox2 Posts: 2,832member
    ducarmur said:
    I am just sooo glad I did not get dissected for my comment by social media.

    Thanks......

    However, what if apple designed a monitor that functions with the Apple Pen Pro?

    Think of the convenience and familiarity with the touch of the iPad's screen.

    Just a crazy thought as Apple has abstained from touch screen Macs.

    That’s a great thought. But ultimately a pencil pro compatible monitor connected to a tower or notebook would be a “Mac.” So I don’t think apple does this until they are ready to apply it on notebooks as well - which they really should. 
  • Reply 13 of 13

    yawn!

    The world is going mobile and Apple is trying to stay ahead. However the risk is... FCP for Mac is still the best and fastest way. 


    It’s interesting. I think the world WAS going mobile. Now, mobile is still huge, but people are returning to notebooks and even desktops to get work done in the most focused and efficient way. 

    Even my creative interns, a bunch of 20-25 year olds are doing everything on their laptops including Instagram posting. 

    I think we reached another inflection point. Mobile was new and “cool” but now folks are past the honeymoon phase and rediscovering the original wheel so to speak. I think the notebook/desktop paradigm is already coming back - especially for heavily creative endeavors such as filmmaking, video editing, motion graphics, and even graphic design. 
    Um that’s because computers have bigger screens and it’s easier sometimes to use keyboard and mouse to edit instead of your fingers, especially when you are layering images. And your 20-25 year olds are still posting on their phones since instagram only works properly when you post via the mobile app. ( the website and desktop app is sh— and they had 10+ years to fix it)
Sign In or Register to comment.