Crime blotter: Teenaged Apple Store robber agrees to pay security guards

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in iPhone

A teenager accused of January's London Apple Store theft has pleaded guilty, an influencer home invasion, and a trip to China in this week's Apple Crime Blotter.

The Apple Store in Brent Cross in London
The Apple Store in Brent Cross in London - Image Credit: Apple



The latest in an occasional AppleInsider series, looking at the world of Apple-related crime.

Teenaged Apple Store robber agrees to pay security guards



A 14-year-old who admitted his part in a January Apple Store robbery in London has agreed to pay compensation to a pair of security guards who were present at the time.

According to The Daily Mail, the teenager pled guilty to robbery but was not considered a ringleader of the incident. In total, five teens entered the Brent Cross Apple Store and stole 50 iPhones. He was given a nine-month referral order and told to pay 100 pounds in compensation to each of the security guards.

Top Los Angeles cop accused of AirTag stalking keeps his right to be an officer



A former assistant chief in the Los Angeles Police Department, who was suspended in January after being accused of stalking a former romantic partner with an AirTag, has won a victory.

The Los Angeles Times reports Alfred "Al" Labrada had his peace officer certification restored, following an investigation by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST). This means he remains eligible to work as a police officer in the state of California.

Labrada did not face criminal charges when the accusation was first raised in 2023, but he was found guilty on seven counts by a civilian disciplinary panel and retired from the department. He later sued, alleging anti-Latino bias.

Influencer who was robbed traced stolen MacBook to hospital



The Twitch personality Kaitlyn Siragusa, known as Amouranth, was the victim of a home invasion in early March, at her residence in Houston.

According to Yahoo, the robbers were after her millions of dollars in crypto assets, but the only item they successfully stole was her MacBook. That was tracked to a hospital - the same one where she was at the time.

Four arrests have been made.

Now I can break some of my silence -- the one object they took was a MacBook. With "find my" turned on. There was a moment of total panic after I got out of the hospital the night of the incident

I tracked the The MacBook and was in disbelief that we were at the same hospital. https://t.co/HwGm7LCP2U

-- Amouranth (@Amouranth)

California man accused of stealing truck and iPad, FaceTiming owner



A 42-year-old man from California has been arrested on charges that he stole a semi-truck. Police say he used the victim's iPad to FaceTime him during the theft.

VVNG explains that FaceTime call led the victim to take a screenshot of the suspect's face. The truck was later found, without the iPad in it, and the suspect began sending threatening messages to the owner.

Ultimately, the victim was able to ping the iPad and notify officers of the suspect's location, leading to his arrest, although he did resist it. He was charged with vehicle theft, possession of a stolen vehicle, possession of stolen property, burglary and resisting arrest with violence.

Philadelphia man's iPhone ended up in China



Two different Philadelphia men, in unrelated incidents, had their iPhones stolen from bars in that city. One tracked his device to Shenzhen, China, after it had earlier pinged in New Orleans.

According to a subsequent 6ABC investigation, theft rings in the U.S. are taking phones and shipping them in bulk to Shenzhen, where they are sometimes sold, and other times stripped for parts.

Man and woman wanted for 2024 purchase of MacBook with stolen credit card



Suffolk County Crime Stoppers on Long Island are looking for a man and woman who they say used a stolen credit card to buy a MacBook from Best Buy in March of 2024.

Per Patch, the two are wanted for grand larceny.

Homes featured on Ted Lasso were targeted for burglaries



Before the official word in mid-March that Ted Lasso is returning for a fourth season on Apple TV+, there were reports of a burglary ring that targeted multiple homes in the London area that were featured on the show.

According to a report in The Sun in January, police are searching for the gang that they say robbed or targeted four "swanky" homes in the Richmond Green area that appeared on Ted Lasso. This included the residence that stood in for the home of team owner Rebecca (Hannah Waddington), however, in the case of that home, the residents were able to chase the thieves away.

Also targeted was a home belonging to Richard Ashcroft, of the band The Verve.

Connecticut police looking for suspect in theft of three iPhones and Apple Watch



Police in Norwich, Conn., are looking for a suspect who they say stole iPhone 16 Pro Max phones and one Apple Watch from an AT&T Store on March 13.

WFSB reports the items are valued at $6,529.96.





Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 7

    A 42-year-old man from California has been arrested on charges that he stole a semi-truck. Police say he used the victim's iPad to FaceTime him during the theft. 


    VVNG explains that FaceTime call led the victim to take a screenshot of the suspect's face. The truck was later found, without the iPad in it, and the suspect began sending threatening messages to the owner. 

    Ultimately, the victim was able to ping the iPad and notify officers of the suspect's location, leading to his arrest, although he did resist it. He was charged with vehicle theft, possession of a stolen vehicle, possession of stolen property, burglary and resisting arrest with violence.

    Read on AppleInsider
    This is one of my pet peeves. Why is the person that the victim and the police have photographic evidence of being called a suspect? They are the perpetrator of the crime, there is proof. Without proof the person could be a suspect, but when there is proof they are no longer suspected, they are the perpetrator. This happens all the time in the media and I don’t understand why. 
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 7
    tokyojimutokyojimu Posts: 537member
    In the US you are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Until then you are a suspect.
    muthuk_vanalingamronnwatto_cobra
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 7
    tokyojimu said:
    In the US you are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Until then you are a suspect.
    You are right, of course, when we are talking about courts. This isn’t a court case and words have meaning. 

    noun | a person thought to be guilty of a crime or offense: the police have arrested a suspect.

    per-pe tra•tor l noun a person who carries out a harmful, illegal, or immoral act: the perpetrators of this crime must be brought to justice.

    In this case, the perpetrator of the crime made a FaceTime call and proved they did it. There is no suspicion here. 

    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 7
    Sorry, there’s no edit option on my phone since the forums updated. That noun is for the word “Suspect”.
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 7
    gustavgustav Posts: 829member
    tokyojimu said:
    In the US you are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Until then you are a suspect.
    You are right, of course, when we are talking about courts. This isn’t a court case and words have meaning. 

    noun | a person thought to be guilty of a crime or offense: the police have arrested a suspect.

    per-pe tra•tor l noun a person who carries out a harmful, illegal, or immoral act: the perpetrators of this crime must be brought to justice.

    In this case, the perpetrator of the crime made a FaceTime call and proved they did it. There is no suspicion here. 

    We only know what the media tells us. The evidence could end up being fake, or it could end up being a case of mistaken identity, etc. It's dangerous to label someone a criminal or perpetrator when we only have a third hand account of evidence. Just ask Richard Jewell (google him)
    ronnwatto_cobra
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 7
    gustav said:
    tokyojimu said:
    In the US you are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Until then you are a suspect.
    You are right, of course, when we are talking about courts. This isn’t a court case and words have meaning. 

    noun | a person thought to be guilty of a crime or offense: the police have arrested a suspect.

    per-pe tra•tor l noun a person who carries out a harmful, illegal, or immoral act: the perpetrators of this crime must be brought to justice.

    In this case, the perpetrator of the crime made a FaceTime call and proved they did it. There is no suspicion here. 

    We only know what the media tells us. The evidence could end up being fake, or it could end up being a case of mistaken identity, etc. It's dangerous to label someone a criminal or perpetrator when we only have a third hand account of evidence. Just ask Richard Jewell (google him)
    Read the rest of the paragraph:

    Ultimately, the victim was able to ping the iPad and notify officers of the suspect's location, leading to his arrest, although he did resist it. He was charged with vehicle theft, possession of a stolen vehicle, possession of stolen property, burglary and resisting arrest with violence.”

    The perpetrator was charged with crimes. He isn’t a suspect. Richard Jewell (who I don’t need to google) WAS a suspect. He ended up not being charged because there was no evidence that he did it. That’s where the word “suspect” makes sense. This is not one of those cases. 
    ronnmacguiwatto_cobra
     1Like 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 7
    macguimacgui Posts: 2,548member
    gustav said:
    tokyojimu said:
    In the US you are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Until then you are a suspect.
    You are right, of course, when we are talking about courts. This isn’t a court case and words have meaning. 

    noun | a person thought to be guilty of a crime or offense: the police have arrested a suspect.

    per-pe tra•tor l noun a person who carries out a harmful, illegal, or immoral act: the perpetrators of this crime must be brought to justice.

    In this case, the perpetrator of the crime made a FaceTime call and proved they did it. There is no suspicion here. 

    We only know what the media tells us. The evidence could end up being fake, or it could end up being a case of mistaken identity, etc. It's dangerous to label someone a criminal or perpetrator when we only have a third hand account of evidence. Just ask Richard Jewell (google him)
    Read the rest of the paragraph:

    ”Ultimately, the victim was able to ping the iPad and notify officers of the suspect's location, leading to his arrest, although he did resist it. He was charged with vehicle theft, possession of a stolen vehicle, possession of stolen property, burglary and resisting arrest with violence.”

    The perpetrator was charged with crimes. He isn’t a suspect. Richard Jewell (who I don’t need to google) WAS a suspect. He ended up not being charged because there was no evidence that he did it. That’s where the word “suspect” makes sense. This is not one of those cases. 
    Until convicted in court he's an alleged perpetrator and a suspect. Media is aware of this and the liability of printing something that isn't proven in a court of law. The idea is to prevent "trying the case it the media" because of the tenet that everyone is innocent until proven guilty when charged with a crime. Words matter. What you maintain is about an arrestee's status is factually incorrect. Police charge innocent people all the time. Charging someone doesn't mean any more than an authority believing someone has committed a crime. They have to prove it even if they caught someone in the commission of a crime.

    Police arresting and charging someone with a crime doesn't make them guilty unless and until it's proven in court. However that doesn't stop any individual from believing what ever they want. Those beliefs may or may not  be correct. Some people believe that whatever they believe is fact. The court systems aren't perfect but they're better than acting solely on someone's arbitrary belief systems.
    muthuk_vanalingamronnwatto_cobra
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.