Reason for small hardware updates-->next year is hw year?

Posted:
in Future Apple Hardware edited January 2014
Maybe reason for small hardware updates are, that Apple has put all the energy for making OS X ready like what Linux is now. Look where OS X is now and how many years it has been on market.Still OS X isn't ready and some things are still slow, but direction has been good/fast.



I am sure, that during the next year Apple will put more power into hardware development and we will see a lot more faster/better hardware. As Steve has said: "Will have options during the next year."

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 20
    joekjoek Posts: 93member
    no...



    the reason for small hardware updates is that that's what is the norm.



    Every update people bitch about "oh this is just a small update to hold us over until the 'big one'".



    Wake up people. Small hardware updates are the routine... the "big one" is by far the exception.
  • Reply 2 of 20
    cliveclive Posts: 720member
    [quote]Originally posted by joek:

    <strong>no...



    the reason for small hardware updates is that that's what is the norm.



    </strong><hr></blockquote>



    I agree. Additionally Apple couldn't afford to be holding back on hardware if they had it, that's their way to make sales. When they have it it will be out - I don't think next year will be any more special than the past year (new iMac, remodelled G4s, brand new product - Xserve...).



    So next year you might get speed-bumped iMacs, new PowerBooks, new pro towers with a new processor - very late in 2003 - and the processor to go in the Xserve too - though perhaps 3-6 months after the towers, so putting that into 2004).



    Which is effectively no different to 2002.
  • Reply 3 of 20
    new apple ad



    small hardware.....beacuse size doesn't matter.



  • Reply 4 of 20
    stunnedstunned Posts: 1,096member
    I am optimistic Apple will come out with more significant hardware updates next year. Especially if they switch to IBM or Motorola suddenly come out with a faster processor.



    We all know that mhz dun matter that much.... but Apple by now must realise that it matters to switchers. Ignore that, and they are doomed.



    So, lets hope Apple wakes up next year.
  • Reply 5 of 20
    nebrienebrie Posts: 483member
    Didn't Steve Jobs say that next year, a lot of things they are doing as well as things that don't make sense to most of us now are going to finally come together next year?
  • Reply 6 of 20
    Wow, somthing just hit me reading this thread. AMD is killing Apple!!! Before the Athlon, Intel would realese a couple of speed bumps a year. Like Apple still dose today. But then the PC world went from 600MHz to 1GHz in six months. While Mot went from 500 to 450, back to 500. I think if AMD was still a "value CPU", Apple and Intel would at least be close in performance.
  • Reply 7 of 20
    leonisleonis Posts: 3,427member
    Only small updates is because Apple has no more new stuff



    I am just joking.....so don't flame me



    [ 11-03-2002: Message edited by: Leonis ]</p>
  • Reply 8 of 20
    serranoserrano Posts: 1,806member




    Wasn't this year supposed to be the hw year? Or was that last?
  • Reply 9 of 20
    bogiebogie Posts: 407member
    Dual G4 processors with dual 5.25" drive bays, DDR RAM, dual video output, dual ATA hard drive controllers, ATA/100.



    How quickly people forget.
  • Reply 10 of 20
    big macbig mac Posts: 480member
    [quote]Originally posted by Stratosfear:

    <strong>Maybe reason for small hardware updates are, that Apple has put all the energy for making OS X ready like what Linux is now. Look where OS X is now and how many years it has been on market.Still OS X isn't ready and some things are still slow, but direction has been good/fast. [SNIP]</strong><hr></blockquote>



    I fail to see where you're going with this sentiment. Apple's hardware and software development teams are separate. Moreover, I don't think OS X is lacking in comparison to Linux in any possible way; to the contrary, OS X is superior in many ways. Most concur with the assertion that Apple's poor progress in hardware has been due to Motorola. It definitely cannot be blamed on OS X.
  • Reply 11 of 20
    [quote]Originally posted by Big Mac:

    <strong>



    I fail to see where you're going with this sentiment. Apple's hardware and software development teams are separate. Moreover, I don't think OS X is lacking in comparison to Linux in any possible way; to the contrary, OS X is superior in many ways. Most concur with the assertion that Apple's poor progress in hardware has been due to Motorola. It definitely cannot be blamed on OS X.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    From old news:



    When asked if Apple would seek an alternative to Motorola's PowerPC, namely chips from Intel, Apple CEO Steve Jobs said the company first had to finish the transition to Mac OS X: "Then we'll have options, and we like to have options," he said.
  • Reply 12 of 20
    cowerdcowerd Posts: 579member
    [quote]Dual G4 processors with dual 5.25" drive bays, DDR RAM, dual video output, dual ATA hard drive controllers, ATA/100.



    How quickly people forget.<hr></blockquote>

    Yeah, they're flying off the shelves as we speak.



    [ 11-04-2002: Message edited by: cowerd ]</p>
  • Reply 13 of 20
    [quote]Originally posted by serrano:

    <strong>



    Wasn't this year supposed to be the hw year? Or was that last?</strong><hr></blockquote>



    <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" />
  • Reply 14 of 20
    amorphamorph Posts: 7,112member
    [quote]Originally posted by cowerd:

    <strong>

    Yeah, they're flying off the shelves as we speak.



    </strong><hr></blockquote>



    Of course they are.



    What did you think that huge fan was for?
  • Reply 15 of 20
    bogiebogie Posts: 407member
    Just trying to remind people that Apple did release Power Macs with every feature people have been screaming for over the past year except 2GHz G4s ... and yet they claim this isn't a hardware year ... Whatever, its never enough, there is always something to complain about.
  • Reply 16 of 20
    [quote]Originally posted by Bogie:

    <strong>and yet they claim this isn't a hardware year ... Whatever, its never enough, there is always something to complain about.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Well, this being AppleInsider, people most likely will only ever stop complaining once Macs outperform PCs in every single spec and cost less (a.k.a. "never").



    Bye,

    RazzFazz
  • Reply 17 of 20
    My new Dual PM is definitly worth it this year.



    But this certainly wasn't a Powerbook year.

    Apple has slipped behind some Intel laptops and it

    may not be until next year before they catch up.
  • Reply 18 of 20
    Well, next year came pretty fast.



    A 1 GHz Superdrive Powerbook will be in my hands come Saturday morning. That is if the New KoP store will have any for its grand opening. <img src="graemlins/smokin.gif" border="0" alt="[Chilling]" />
  • Reply 19 of 20
    [quote]Originally posted by MrBillData:

    <strong>Well, next year came pretty fast.



    A 1 GHz Superdrive Powerbook will be in my hands come Saturday morning. That is if the New KoP store will have any for its grand opening. <img src="graemlins/smokin.gif" border="0" alt="[Chilling]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>



    I doubt you'll have one by saturday, the online Apple store shows a 3-4 weeks delay. If you do find one, can you buy one for me? There are no Apple stores in Canada.
  • Reply 20 of 20
    Ah, the old refrain...
Sign In or Register to comment.