NRAM a possibility?

Jump to First Reply
g-dogg-dog
Posted:
in Future Apple Hardware edited January 2014
Is NRAM a possibility for the long-term future? like late next year?



NRAM info - Nantero's homepage



The thought of this coupled with a 970 or more likely 980 is one that can't escape my mind.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 13
    bihbih Posts: 44member
    This tech is still a couple of years off. But if there was a surprise announcement at WWDC including NRAM, I would poop a brick.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 13
    gamblorgamblor Posts: 446member
    On a different note, isn't it about time for MRAM to make an appearance?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 13
    thegeldingthegelding Posts: 3,230member
    shouldn't we be using XRAM or iRAM...though iRAM could be taken in the wrong way...





    g
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 13
    bigcbigc Posts: 1,224member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by thegelding

    shouldn't we be using XRAM or iRAM...though iRAM could be taken in the wrong way...





    g



     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 13
    ghost_user_nameghost_user_name Posts: 22,667member
    I still think we need to convert back to EDO Simms

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 13
    alcimedesalcimedes Posts: 5,486member
    that would be slick if you could have your entire OS reside in NRAM.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 13
    gamblorgamblor Posts: 446member
    <old fart>

    EDO? You young whippersnappers don't know memory.



    We need good ol' CORE MEMORY!

    </old fart>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 13
    junkyard dawgjunkyard dawg Posts: 2,801member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by bih

    This tech is still a couple of years off. But if there was a surprise announcement at WWDC including NRAM, I would poop a brick.



    Better be careful about making pronouncements about bodily functions here at FH--they might hold you to it.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 13
    t'hain esh kelcht'hain esh kelch Posts: 1,274member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by \\/\\/ickes

    I still think we need to convert back to EDO Simms





    Yeah, lets starts a petition!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 13
    costiquecostique Posts: 1,084member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by \\/\\/ickes

    I still think we need to convert back to EDO Simms





    Yes! It worked like a charm. Does anyone know why they switched to DIMMs, DDR and all that? Guess it's marketing. They look all the same. Guess they are all the same.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 13
    chuckerchucker Posts: 5,089member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by thegelding

    shouldn't we be using XRAM or iRAM...though iRAM could be taken in the wrong way...





    g



     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 13
    willywalloowillywalloo Posts: 408member
    NRAM should be a definite possibility for the future, imagine you are working late on a paper and for some reason the power shuts off.



    hmmm. here are the two different scenarios between NRAM and RAM.



    RAM

    ====

    you just lost all of your work



    NRAM

    ====

    your computer turns back on, and all of your work is still there.



    Then you get kinda scared, because you know your computer isn't supposed to do this.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 13
    davegeedavegee Posts: 2,765member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by willywalloo

    Then you get kinda scared, because you know your computer isn't supposed to do this.



    Talking to our kids/grandkids, "... in MY day when you lost power anything you were working on was GONE unless you were luck enough to save it right before you lost power ... you kids don't know how lucky you have it"



    D
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.