Fatherly Conversation on world matters

Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
Q: Daddy, why did we have to attack Iraq?



A: Because they had weapons of mass destruction.



Q: But the inspectors didn't find any weapons of mass destruction.



A: That's because the Iraqis were hiding them.



Q: And that's why we invaded Iraq?



A: Yep. Invasions always work better than inspections.



Q: But after we invaded them, we STILL didn't find any weapons of mass

destruction, did we?



A: That's because the weapons are so well hidden. Don't worry, we'll

find something, probably right before the 2004 election.



Q: Why did Iraq want all those weapons of mass destruction?



A: To use them in a war, silly.



Q: I'm confused. If they had all those weapons that they planned to use

in a war, then why didn't they use any of those weapons when we went to

war with them?



A: Well, obviously they didn't want anyone to know they had those

weapons, so they chose to die by the thousands rather than defend

themselves.



Q: That doesn't make sense. Why would they choose to die if they had

all those big weapons with which they could have fought back?



A: It's a different culture. It's not supposed to make sense.



Q: I don't know about you, but I don't think they had any of those

weapons our government said they did.



A: Well, you know, it doesn't matter whether or not they had those

weapons. We had another good reason to invade them anyway.



Q: And what was that?



A: Even if Iraq didn't have weapons of mass destruction, Saddam Hussein

was a cruel dictator, which is another good reason to invade another

country.



Q: Why? What does a cruel dictator do that makes it OK to invade

his country?



A: Well, for one thing, he tortured his own people.



Q: Kind of like what they do in China?



A: Don't go comparing China to Iraq. China is a good economic

competitor, where millions of people work for slave wages in sweatshops

to make U.S. corporations richer.



Q: So if a country lets its people be exploited for American corporate

gain, it's a good country, even if that country tortures people?



A: Right.



Q: Why were people in Iraq being tortured?



A: For political crimes, mostly, like criticizing the government. People

who criticized the government in Iraq were sent to prison and tortured.



Q: Isn't that exactly what happens in China?



A: I told you, China is different.



Q: What's the difference between China and Iraq?



A: Well, for one thing, Iraq was ruled by the Ba'ath party, while

China is Communist.



Q: Didn't you once tell me Communists were bad?



A: No, just Cuban Communists are bad.



Q: How are the Cuban Communists bad?



A: Well, for one thing, people who criticize the government in Cuba are

sent to prison and tortured.



Q: Like in Iraq?



A: Exactly.



Q: And like in China, too?



A: I told you, China's a good economic competitor. Cuba, on the other

hand, is not.



Q: How come Cuba isn't a good economic competitor?

A: Well, you see, back in the early 1960s, our government passed some

laws that made it illegal for Americans to trade or do any business with

Cuba until they stopped being Communists and started being capitalists

like us.



Q: But if we got rid of those laws, opened up trade with Cuba, and

started doing business with them, wouldn't that help the Cubans become

capitalists?



A: Don't be a smart-ass.



Q: I didn't think I was being one.



A: Well, anyway, they also don't have freedom of religion in Cuba.



Q: Kind of like China and the Falun Gong movement?



A: I told you, stop saying bad things about China. Anyway, Saddam

Hussein came to power through a military coup, so he's not really a

legitimate leader anyway.



Q: What's a military coup?



A: That's when a military general takes over the government of a country

by force, instead of holding free elections like we do in the United

States.



Q: Didn't the ruler of Pakistan come to power by a military coup?



A: You mean General Pervez Musharraf? Uh, yeah, he did, but Pakistan is

our friend.



Q: Why is Pakistan our friend if their leader is illegitimate?



A: I never said Pervez Musharraf was illegitimate.



Q: Didn't you just say a military general who comes to power by Forcibly

overthrowing the legitimate government of a nation is an illegitimate

leader?



A: Only Saddam Hussein. Pervez Musharraf is our friend, because he

helped us invade Afghanistan.



Q: Why did we invade Afghanistan?



A: Because of what they did to us on September 11th.



Q: What did Afghanistan do to us on September 11th?



A: Well, on September 11th, nineteen men - fifteen of them Saudi

Arabians - hijacked four airplanes and flew three of them into

buildings, killing over 3,000 Americans.



Q: So how did Afghanistan figure into all that?



A: Afghanistan was where those bad men trained, under the oppressive

rule of the Taliban.



Q: Aren't the Taliban those bad radical Islamics who chopped off

people's heads and hands?



A: Yes, that's exactly who they were. Not only did they chop off

people's heads and hands, but they oppressed women, too.



Q: Didn't the Bush administration give the Taliban 43 million dollars

back in May of 2001?



A: Yes, but that money was a reward because they did such a good job

fighting drugs.



Q: Fighting drugs?



A: Yes, the Taliban were very helpful in stopping people from growing

opium poppies.



Q: How did they do such a good job?



A: Simple. If people were caught growing opium poppies, the Taliban

would have their hands and heads cut off.



Q: So, when the Taliban cut off people's heads and hands for growing

flowers, that was OK, but not if they cut people's heads and hands off

for other reasons?



A: Yes. It's OK with us if radical Islamic fundamentalists cut off

people's hands for growing flowers, but it's cruel if they cut off

people's hands for stealing bread.



Q: Don't they also cut off people's hands and heads in Saudi Arabia?



A: That's different. Afghanistan was ruled by a tyrannical patriarchy

that oppressed women and forced them to wear burqas whenever they were

in public, with death by stoning as the penalty for women who did not

comply.



Q: Don't Saudi women have to wear burqas in public, too?



A: No, Saudi women merely wear a traditional Islamic body covering.



Q: What's the difference?



A: The traditional Islamic covering worn by Saudi women is a modest yet

fashionable garment that covers all of a woman's body except for her

eyes and fingers. The burqa, on the other hand, is an evil tool of

patriarchal oppression that covers all of a woman's body except for her

eyes and fingers.



Q: It sounds like the same thing with a different name.



A: Now, don't go comparing Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia. The Saudis are

our friends.



Q: But I thought you said 15 of the 19 hijackers on September 11th were

from Saudi Arabia.



A: Yes, but they trained in Afghanistan.



Q: Who trained them?



A: A very bad man named Osama bin Laden.



Q: Was he from Afghanistan?



A: Uh, no, he was from Saudi Arabia too. But he was a bad man, a very

bad man.



Q: I seem to recall he was our friend once.



A: Only when we helped him and the mujahadeen repel the Soviet invasion

of Afghanistan back in the 1980s.



Q: Who are the Soviets? Was that the Evil Communist Empire Ronald

Reagan talked about?



A: There are no more Soviets. The Soviet Union broke up in 1990 or

thereabouts, and now they have elections and capitalism like us. We

call them Russians now.



Q: So the Soviets - I mean, the Russians - are now our friends?



A: Well, not really. You see, they were our friends for many years

after they stopped being Soviets, but then they decided not to support

our invasion of Iraq, so we're mad at them now. We're also mad at the

French and the Germans because they didn't help us invade Iraq either.



Q: So the French and Germans are evil, too?



A: Not exactly evil, but just bad enough that we had to rename French

fries and French toast to Freedom Fries and Freedom Toast.



Q: Do we always rename foods whenever another country doesn't do what we

want them to do?



A: No, we just do that to our friends. Our enemies, we invade.



Q: But wasn't Iraq one of our friends back in the 1980s?



A: Well, yeah. For a while.



Q: Was Saddam Hussein ruler of Iraq back then?



A: Yes, but at the time he was fighting against Iran, which made him our

friend, temporarily.



Q: Why did that make him our friend?



A: Because at that time, Iran was our enemy.



Q: Isn't that when he gassed the Kurds?



A: Yeah, but since he was fighting against Iran at the time, we looked

the other way, to show him we were his friend.



Q: So anyone who fights against one of our enemies automatically Becomes

our friend?



A: Most of the time, yes.



Q: And anyone who fights against one of our friends is automatically an

enemy?



A: Sometimes that's true, too. However, if American corporations can

profit by selling weapons to both sides at the same time, all the

better.



Q: Why?



A: Because war is good for the economy, which means war is good for

America. Also, since God is on America's side, anyone who opposes war

is a godless unAmerican Communist. Do you understand now why we

attacked Iraq?



Q: I think so. We attacked them because God wanted us to, right?



A: Yes.



Q: But how did we know God wanted us to attack Iraq?



A: Well, you see, God personally speaks to George W. Bush and tells him

what to do.



Q: So basically, what you're saying is that we attacked Iraq because

George W. Bush hears voices in his head?



A. Yes! You finally understand how the world works. Now close your

eyes, make yourself comfortable, and go to sleep. Good night.



Q: Good night,

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 13
    kelibkelib Posts: 740member
    Just like to make it clear that I supported the liberation of Iraq. I just found it funny, that's why I posted it. That's all there is to it on my behalf
  • Reply 2 of 13
    andersanders Posts: 6,523member
    I was starting to wonder my war loving dan.... Icelandic friend.



    At least they haven´t renamed danish pastry yet. That would be a cultural loss.
  • Reply 3 of 13
    brbr Posts: 8,395member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Anders

    I was starting to wonder my war loving dan.... Icelandic friend.



    At least they haven´t renamed danish pastry yet. That would be a cultural loss.




    Yeah. If they get renamed Justice Pastries...I don't know what I'd do. I already hate my government. The system is broken beyond repair. This country is going downhill fast and the sheep just give it an extra push. It's really depressing to be an American these days.
  • Reply 4 of 13
    scottscott Posts: 7,431member
    Glad to see the anti-american hate squade is doing well here at AI.
  • Reply 5 of 13
    andersanders Posts: 6,523member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Scott

    Glad to see the anti-american hate squade is doing well here at AI.



    And who would that be Scott? Are you seeing posts I am not?
  • Reply 6 of 13
    kelibkelib Posts: 740member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Scott

    Glad to see the anti-american hate squade is doing well here at AI.



    Please elaborate? Aren't you being paranoid?
  • Reply 7 of 13
    keyboardf12keyboardf12 Posts: 1,379member
    scot. i'm american. and all i can say is the truth hurts sometimes.
  • Reply 8 of 13
    Quote:

    Originally posted by kelib

    Just like to make it clear that I supported the liberation of Iraq. I just found it funny, that's why I posted it. That's all there is to it on my behalf



    you found it funny? you mean you didn't write it? didn't you know:



    quote:

    - Threads with no original content will not be allowed. Example: posting a link or quoting and article while contributing little to nothing of your own.







    it's bad enough i get this kind of crap in my emails but i have to read it here also?
  • Reply 9 of 13
    kelibkelib Posts: 740member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by superkarate monkeydeathcar





    it's bad enough i get this kind of crap in my emails but i have to read it here to?




    No, you don't have to read it
  • Reply 10 of 13
    Quote:

    Originally posted by kelib

    No, you don't have to read it



    uh i didn't after the third pathetic line, this thread should be locked.

    one was locked yesterday for the exact same reason.
  • Reply 11 of 13
    andersanders Posts: 6,523member
    If that was the case Fellowship should be locked up.
  • Reply 12 of 13
    powerdocpowerdoc Posts: 8,123member
    Superkarate don't play the mod, or PM one.



    Kelib : there is no original content in your thread. I believed you wrote it, but it's not the case. Sorry this thread is locked.
Sign In or Register to comment.