Smokin' literally..Prescott may be 100 watts
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=10612
Quote:
But our Babel Fish translator had a nervous breakdown when it attempted to make snese of the article.
Before Babelfish ran off screaming in terror, it had a go at translating it.
The article appears to say that the power consumption of Prescott is much higher than Intel expected and manages a not so cool 100 watts. La Intella apparently wanted it to perform at 86 watts
It also goes into some detail about how current 478 pin Intel motherboards might cope or not with the increased wattage, and also has some information about the chips projected after Prescott, that is to say Tejas and Nehalem.
You can find the complete article
But our Babel Fish translator had a nervous breakdown when it attempted to make snese of the article.
Before Babelfish ran off screaming in terror, it had a go at translating it.
The article appears to say that the power consumption of Prescott is much higher than Intel expected and manages a not so cool 100 watts. La Intella apparently wanted it to perform at 86 watts
It also goes into some detail about how current 478 pin Intel motherboards might cope or not with the increased wattage, and also has some information about the chips projected after Prescott, that is to say Tejas and Nehalem.
You can find the complete article
Comments
He has something of a reputation for speaking none too clearly and hence the bablefish reference in the link is given a (deliberate?!) double meaning.