Using Panther or Jag? Panther's expert colorsync calibration is much more complete. also, using it for others to see, i.e., web? If so, use 2.2 gamma like windows machines and TVs. If not or if the stuff is going to print, traditional Mac 1.8 gamma is fine.
I usually set my white point/temperature to about 6500K, though as mentioned, tungsten or fluorescent lighting in the room might need something cooler to get a more accurate looking white point on screen. That might mean cooler colors in prints or on others' computers though.
Well we have one of those fancy $350 Spyder calibrators at work, and it works fine on the CRT, but on the LCD it is still off. We have found it best to use that to get the color extremely close and then work on temperature and fine adjustments with other freeware programs. We just make them look as close as possible to the printed product in daylight.
That is the monitor is normally in shittier florescent light or other types, and pictures tend to be displayed in daylight so you have to have the picture in daylight to compare to your florescent or whatever light monitor. Hope you have a good eye
If you're going to do it manually I concur that SuperCal is the tool to use, though Panther's calibration tools have improved as well as their ICC profile mgmt tools. Otherwise I'd try the Spyder and OptiCAL 3.7.x. I have one (admittedly for a CRT) but I've heard others who use LCDs are happy as well.
Comments
Will the ambient room lighting be constant?
(ie: only ever used under fluorescent -ek- , gets glaring morning/aft sun, in cave, etc)
You can save multiple profiles, each optimized/calibrated under that lighting, if so desired.
Might be interesting to test, YMMV.
I usually set my white point/temperature to about 6500K, though as mentioned, tungsten or fluorescent lighting in the room might need something cooler to get a more accurate looking white point on screen. That might mean cooler colors in prints or on others' computers though.
I have flueroscent lighting. not too bright though....hard to explain.
running panther
That is the monitor is normally in shittier florescent light or other types, and pictures tend to be displayed in daylight so you have to have the picture in daylight to compare to your florescent or whatever light monitor. Hope you have a good eye
Dobby.
Originally posted by dobby
Are LCDs as colour accurate as CRTs?
Dobby.
I wonder too, because LCD's when calibrated just seem so much more vibrant that I don't see how you can compare.