Hmm...just realized safari is missing this
Unless there is some weird way I do not know exists, I cannot pull up a contextual menu that allows me to copy the image address of a picture in Safari. I can copy the image to the clipboard. I can download the image to the disk. I can open the image in a new window. I don't see a "copy image address" option at all. I'm pissed.
Comments
Send feedback.
And I mailed the Support Team, Brad.
Originally posted by BR
Unless there is some weird way I do not know exists, I cannot pull up a contextual menu that allows me to copy the image address of a picture in Safari. I can copy the image to the clipboard. I can download the image to the disk. I can open the image in a new window. I don't see a "copy image address" option at all. I'm pissed.
Yup, this sucks. You can open the image in a new window and copy the address from there.
I don't know. Maybe? heh
Isn't that bad netiquette? I usually download things and host them on my iDisk if I'm posting an image.
*shrug*
Of course, there are other uses for it, and it does suck.
Originally posted by Kickaha
I've gotten really good at "Open image in New Window", Cmd-L, Cmd-C, Cmd-W...
Me too...or dragging the picture to the address bar and copying. The point is, you shouldn't have to do this. This is OS X we're talking about here!
Originally posted by DMBand0026
The point is, you shouldn't have to do this. This is OS X we're talking about here!
Wrong. This is Safari. Not OS X. OS X is the Operating System, Safari is an app which runs on OS X. If you want to copy the url of the image with a ctrl-click, you have to get yourself a different browser.
Originally posted by Defiant
Wrong. This is Safari. Not OS X. OS X is the Operating System, Safari is an app which runs on OS X. If you want to copy the url of the image with a ctrl-click, you have to get yourself a different browser.
I think you're completely missing DMBand's point. Safari is part of Mac OS X. It's built and provided by Apple. The reason he's saying "The point is, you shouldn't have to do this. This is OS X we're talking about here!" is because he expects apps by Apple that are included with the OS to be close to be really good, like the OS itself is. Safari is lacking and he's bundling the complaint with that of Mac OS X.
Safari is just as much Mac OS X as TextEdit, Mail, or Disk Utility. Sure, you can find third-party alternatives, but these are Apple's and they come built-in with your system.
Originally posted by Brad
I think you're completely missing DMBand's point. Safari is part of Mac OS X. It's built and provided by Apple. The reason he's saying "The point is, you shouldn't have to do this. This is OS X we're talking about here!" is because he expects apps by Apple that are included with the OS to be close to be really good, like the OS itself is. Safari is lacking and he's bundling the complaint with that of Mac OS X.
Safari is just as much Mac OS X as TextEdit, Mail, or Disk Utility. Sure, you can find third-party alternatives, but these are Apple's and they come built-in with your system.
Exactly.
Originally posted by BigBlue
Just found out something else Saffie can't: animated background (gif's).
I'm not sure if that's a bug or a feature to protect user's sanity
note - some sites you can't direct d/l from a link i.e. ww.motogp.com it must open in a new window first..
Originally posted by Brad
I think you're completely missing DMBand's point. Safari is part of Mac OS X.
Yeah.. same goes for Internet Explorer too huh? I thing it's just fine for Safari's menus not to be overloaded with junk.
Originally posted by Brad
I think you're completely missing DMBand's point. Safari is part of Mac OS X. It's built and provided by Apple.
Yeah I guess I missed it.