This is getting tad boring.
As a US hating pinko commie european I can appreciate a healthy doze of Bush bashing but as a member here I think its getting out of hand.
Would it really be impossible to fit any of the new perspectives on how Bush sucks into already existing threads?
Comments
"Vote your conscience" my ass...
Vote "not Bush"...whatever meat puppet the Dems throw up on stage is "da guy" to vote for.
Or else Be Happy with Bush for another 4 wars, I mean years.
Ashcroft Gallbladder Alert Level: Yellow/Elevated
tut tut
Originally posted by Anders
This is getting tad boring.
As a US hating pinko commie european I can appreciate a healthy doze of Bush bashing but as a member here I think its getting out of hand.
Would it really be impossible to fit any of the new perspectives on how Bush sucks into already existing threads?
After the election it will go away.
Besides if they were all in the same thread someone would argue that we were off topic.
People need to hear this stuff until he's gone.
Originally posted by Anders
This is getting tad boring.
As a US hating pinko commie european I can appreciate a healthy doze of Bush bashing but as a member here I think its getting out of hand.
Would it really be impossible to fit any of the new perspectives on how Bush sucks into already existing threads?
Besides . . . it isn't really true . . . there are not that many threads
and besides there are NOT ENOUGH THREADS
Originally posted by SonOfSylvanus
Votes to denounce irresponsible moderator for starting silly thread: 1
tut tut
Hell. I became mod because I was silly, silly.
And besides you don´t elect kin...mods
1) Bush is a moron
2) No, Bush just acts dumb, Kerry's a rich New-England Elitist.
3) No Bush just sucks
4) Nuh-uh
5) Uhh-huu
6) Your Mom!
Anywho, this is the notoriously liberal AI:AO so honestly, what did you expect?
When Clinton was getting Bashed it was non-stop threadage
Don't give food to the "oh just another Bush-bash' dismissal trolls
its a lame lame lame lame lame response to real pressing issues that everybody, pro-Bush anti-Bush, should address. . . .
Damn, 500+young American soldiers killed on the battlefield many many more very wounded, for what could have been a purily ideologically driven invasion of a foriegn country,
Possible deliberate missleading of American People in order to achieve these ideological goals via war
alienation from the essential network of civilized nations,
hugest debt ever!!!
Social Sucurity -pining away for a 'lock-box'- to pay for debt
Environment . . . !!
Scientific panels replaced by non-scientist-business-men in order to ignore issues relating to the environment
etc etc
the list is long, the issues should be discussed, as they are all pertinent . . . and so what if you get tired of talking about what is important simply because it becomes increasingly obviouse to all that one person is responsible: the one person who's power allows all these issues to pop-up is George Bush?!?!?! and therefor his name gets brought up everytime that these issues are addressed?
When I post topics it pertains to an issue.
And often it doesn't even pertain directly to Bush.
Plamegate.
GOP Memogate.
Haliburton.
The presidential race.
Unemployment.
These are important issues... if you want to ignore them don't go into those threads. If you look at most of them... they're many pages long the debate stays in the thread. And they do run out of steam.
Originally posted by Crusader
The arguments:
1) Bush is a moron
2) No, Bush just acts dumb, Kerry's a rich New-England Elitist.
3) No Bush just sucks
4) Nuh-uh
5) Uhh-huu
6) Your Mom!
Anywho, this is the notoriously liberal AI:AO so honestly, what did you expect?
Bush allowed campaign donors to stay overnight in the Lincoln bedroom
That scandal (Clinton overniters) and Bush's criticism of it is one of the reasons the White House identifies guests. In a debate with Vice President Al Gore (news - web sites) in October 2000, Bush said: "I believe they've moved that sign, `The buck stops here,' from the Oval Office desk to `The buck stops here' on the Lincoln Bedroom. And that's not good for the country."
well . . . . not only did he speak too soon . . . . HAHAHA
he said "The Buck stops here" . . . except that that is the last thing he seems capable of saying these days!!!
ok. something other than politics...
I think it has less to do with politics and more to do with people just have very diverse view points...
and of course many of them are just WRONG!
hehe
georgebushgeorgebushgeorgebushgeorgebushgoergebush
OMG U R BANNED!
Originally posted by Anders
This is getting tad boring.
Agreed, though there is the possibility of some merit to these topics, they usually are fronts for talking about Bush in general terms, or worse, intended as a ruse towards other members. Even if the topic starter doesn't intend this, the thread usually devolves into it at some point if it's political.
Maybe we should just create a running poll or checklist of poster's position on the guy, and have AO load this page up each time you enter the forum, then you can procedd about your normal business. Save everyone a lot of redundant typing.
Would it really be impossible to fit any of the new perspectives on how Bush sucks into already existing threads?
On top of this, my thought is that any new threads would address a specific event or issue (not addressed before of course), and that the replies would stick more strictly to that issue. Threads that drift too much are ones that presumably have run out of steam about the topic, and thus don't serve much purpose any more.
Originally posted by Crusader
Anywho, this is the notoriously liberal AI:AO so honestly, what did you expect?
Why weren't you policing the place when there were all the 'kill the iraqis; they have wmd!'
At least our discussions about Bush are about actual situations that exist in the real world.
Originally posted by Messiahtosh
Bush will win the election.
Yeah, and pigs will grow wings.
Originally posted by BuonRotto
OMG U R BANNED!
Agreed, though there is the possibility of some merit to these topics, they usually are fronts for talking about Bush in general terms, or worse, intended as a ruse towards other members. Even if the topic starter doesn't intend this, the thread usually devolves into it at some point if it's political.
Maybe we should just create a running poll or checklist of poster's position on the guy, and have AO load this page up each time you enter the forum, then you can procedd about your normal business. Save everyone a lot of redundant typing.
On top of this, my thought is that any new threads would address a specific event or issue (not addressed before of course), and that the replies would stick more strictly to that issue. Threads that drift too much are ones that presumably have run out of steam about the topic, and thus don't serve much purpose any more.
I've always found that the reason the topics devolve is because once confronted by the truth some people resort to petty criticism of typos, spelling, or just of a personal nature.