Apple's laptops pale by comparision

Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
So I pop by my local BestBuy today and lo and behold, Apple products!

It was a welcome sight...but not for long. The ability to compare PC laptops next to Apple's showed how poor the PB's LCD display is.



Sony's X-Brite screens and the like, were razor sharp with great contrast. In fact a 13.3" Sony Vaio at 4.2 lbs and combo drive was rather impressive. Other than the OS and two crappy thin trackpad buttons, it was quite nice. I must admit, in comparison, the PB's and iBooks screens were dull, lacked punch, and slickness.



Which led me to think, why doesn't Apple utilize the best LCD technology into their laptops. Is it a power issue? Or it just too expensive? Or are we just in between revisions and should expect this to see better displays in the next gen of PBs?

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 18
    ipodandimacipodandimac Posts: 3,273member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by satchmo

    So I pop by my local BestBuy today and lo and behold, Apple products!

    It was a welcome sight...but not for long. The ability to compare PC laptops next to Apple's showed how poor the PB's LCD display is.



    Sony's X-Brite screens and the like, were razor sharp with great contrast. In fact a 13.3" Sony Vaio at 4.2 lbs and combo drive was rather impressive. Other than the OS and two crappy thin trackpad buttons, it was quite nice. I must admit, in comparison, the PB's and iBooks screens were dull, lacked punch, and slickness.



    Which led me to think, why doesn't Apple utilize the best LCD technology into their laptops. Is it a power issue? Or it just too expensive? Or are we just in between revisions and should expect this to see better displays in the next gen of PBs?




    i'll take my 5.5 hour battery life over a brighter display any day. besides, i almost never turn the lcd brightness up more than the first notch anyways.
  • Reply 2 of 18
    ibook911ibook911 Posts: 607member
    I agree in regards to Apple notebook displays. My ibook's display looks like a 10-year old technology compared to my Dell notebook's LCD.
  • Reply 3 of 18
    mattyjmattyj Posts: 898member
    Yes and that's why they run out of battery on about 2 and a half hours. It's all about compromise.
  • Reply 4 of 18
    vox barbaravox barbara Posts: 2,021member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by ipodandimac

    i'll take my 5.5 hour battery life over a brighter display any day. besides, i almost never turn the lcd brightness up more than the first notch anyways.





    keeps your eyes wide shut
  • Reply 5 of 18
    applenutapplenut Posts: 5,768member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by mattyj

    Yes and that's why they run out of battery on about 2 and a half hours. It's all about compromise.



    um. no it isn't. and no powerbook today lasts 5 hours. in fact, with the 15 and 17 inch powerbooks you'll be hard pressed to get 3.5.



    apple's portable LCDs have been dissapointing for a while now. But a lot can be done to improve them by messing with the colorsync options
  • Reply 6 of 18
    gavrielgavriel Posts: 175member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by ipodandimac

    i'll take my 5.5 hour battery life over a brighter display any day. besides, i almost never turn the lcd brightness up more than the first notch anyways.



    He isn't just talking about brightness. Clarity, contrast, viewing-angle, refresh-rates and color richness are also important factors when evaluating display quality. Apple laptops are not comparing very well here. Besides, I'll take a better display over longer battery life any day. I'm using my computer wirelessly maybe 20 percent of the time, but I'm using its screen 100 percent of the time. As do most people.
  • Reply 7 of 18
    5.5 hours? Hell I wish I could get a full 3 out of my brand new 12inch! Do you have a diesel generator powering yours?
  • Reply 8 of 18
    Quote:

    Originally posted by GreggWSmith

    5.5 hours? Hell I wish I could get a full 3 out of my brand new 12inch! Do you have a diesel generator powering yours?



    nope, just the right power settings i guess. my 12" is about 4 months old, and 5.5 hours is admittedly the top-top end of my battery life, but i never get worse than 4.5 hours unless i'm doing major video work or watching a dvd. i use my laptop "unplugged" probably 90% of the time.
  • Reply 9 of 18
    applenutapplenut Posts: 5,768member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by ipodandimac

    nope, just the right power settings i guess. my 12" is about 4 months old, and 5.5 hours is admittedly the top-top end of my battery life, but i never get worse than 4.5 hours unless i'm doing major video work or watching a dvd. i use my laptop "unplugged" probably 90% of the time.



    cough....bullshit...cough



    altho with only 2 bars of brightness you probably do get better than most, altho i have no idea how you dind that usuable unless all you do is work in pitch black and don't care about how anything looks.
  • Reply 10 of 18
    Quote:

    Originally posted by applenut

    cough....bullshit...cough



    altho with only 2 bars of brightness you probably do get better than most, altho i have no idea how you dind that usuable unless all you do is work in pitch black and don't care about how anything looks.




    Not at all. I have a brand spanking new 14" iBook and I get a solid 4.5 to 5 hours out of it, and my settings aren't that low at all.
  • Reply 11 of 18
    I would very much like to know what these settings are?
  • Reply 12 of 18
    mac voyermac voyer Posts: 1,294member
    Try using your laptop with your screen all the way on like the nice bright Sonys. Also, turn airport on. If all you are doing is typing notes on an unlit screen, you have no right to talk about battery life. Even diehard Mac evangelist admit that battery life is nothing special on the books these days. It is also well known that Centrino notebooks eat Apple's battery life lunch.



    Personally, I believe the difference is a classic form over function compromise. The Apple notes are thiner and lighter. To get there, they opted for less backlighting and less robust screens. Often Apple has chosen style and aesthetics over function and performance. Apple has probably rightly decided that their customers would rather have a sexy, thin notebook over a clear, bright screen. Too bad for the rest of us who would rather have function over form.
  • Reply 13 of 18
    a_greera_greer Posts: 4,594member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Mac Voyer

    Try using your laptop with your screen all the way on like the nice bright Sonys. Also, turn airport on. If all you are doing is typing notes on an unlit screen, you have no right to talk about battery life. Even diehard Mac evangelist admit that battery life is nothing special on the books these days. It is also well known that Centrino notebooks eat Apple's battery life lunch.



    Personally, I believe the difference is a classic form over function compromise. The Apple notes are thiner and lighter. To get there, they opted for less backlighting and less robust screens. Often Apple has chosen style and aesthetics over function and performance. Apple has probably rightly decided that their customers would rather have a sexy, thin notebook over a clear, bright screen. Too bad for the rest of us who would rather have function over form.




    Why cant we have both form and function, keep the same style and dimentions accept make it like 1/5 inch thicker for a better display and slightly beefier battery?



    Surely they could make a scaleable G5 and tune the wireless consumtion and be able to compete with centrino on bat life.
  • Reply 14 of 18
    satchmosatchmo Posts: 2,699member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by a_greer

    Why cant we have both form and function, keep the same style and dimentions accept make it like 1/5 inch thicker for a better display and slightly beefier battery?







    Amen! While the PB's are undoubtedly sexier, it's way too fragile. I'm guessing even hard core Apple enthusiasts would welcome a bit more functionality over form. I'd certainly take adding an eighth of an inch thickness for increased brightness.

    That said, some of Sony's offerings are pretty slim and lightweight, yet still possess that X-Brite screen technology. Perhaps Centrino is the key.
  • Reply 15 of 18
    squashsquash Posts: 332member
    Perhaps i could have some of that satchmo smoke?



    You should feel lucky i hadn't been in BestBuy minutes before you. That pc laptop area would have been ghasta styled and you would have been singing the Apple praise instead.



    Buy the Sony...all of you
  • Reply 16 of 18
    satchmosatchmo Posts: 2,699member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by SQUÅSH

    Perhaps i could have some of that satchmo smoke?





    It's not as if Apple can do no wrong. I love Apple, but I'm not blind to Steve's RDF.
  • Reply 17 of 18
    randycat99randycat99 Posts: 1,919member
    Well, before you start comparing screens side by side, you have to consider that chances are slim that any of them come out of the box properly calibrated (nor does anybody bother to calibrate them when setting them up for display). You really can't judge what the quality or brightness is until you Colorsync them. You'll find that the default condition compared to a reasonably well calibrated one look pretty different with the default being too bright, washed out, and just generally hard to read stuff on.



    Also consider that all of this falls into the same trap that selling TV's have been in for years. The punchiest, brightest looking one always seems to look "best", but it will be far from accurate. Nevertheless, the uninformed customers seem to always gravitate to the most poorly adjusted sets simply because they have the contrast and sharpness boosted to high hell. They may stand out on the sales floor, but it is a different picture (no pun intended) when you actually have it in your home. That is where the qualities of accuracy and low eye fatigue can really come into play.
  • Reply 18 of 18
    THe display in my 1Ghz Ti is pretty nice. It's no less than the Sony 18" LCD panel I have next to it.
Sign In or Register to comment.