...years ago a typical response time on an LCD monitor may have been anywhere from 30 to 50 milliseconds, and today these numbers can get down into the single digits, with anything 25 milliseconds or less being quite common (lower is definitely better). Using the three 17? LCD monitors currently available from ComputerGeeks.com as examples shows two with response times of 25ms and one with a response time of 16ms...
...and I've read it in other places. So I'm curious about Mac displays.
Comments
Originally posted by thebeaglebeagle
This may be obvious, and well known, but it isn't posted on Apple's product pages. Not that I can find, anyway.
Anybody know the refresh rate on the latest units in ms?
fast? i think if you're already talking in terms of ms, it really shouldnt be an issue.
Originally posted by ipodandimac
fast? i think if you're already talking in terms of ms, it really shouldnt be an issue.
Well... ms is a standard way of comparing refresh rates on LCD monitors.
Like:
This website:http://www.bigbruin.com/techtip005.htm
Quotes:
...years ago a typical response time on an LCD monitor may have been anywhere from 30 to 50 milliseconds, and today these numbers can get down into the single digits, with anything 25 milliseconds or less being quite common (lower is definitely better). Using the three 17? LCD monitors currently available from ComputerGeeks.com as examples shows two with response times of 25ms and one with a response time of 16ms...
...and I've read it in other places. So I'm curious about Mac displays.
Thanks!
-d
Originally posted by thebeaglebeagle
This may be obvious, and well known, but it isn't posted on Apple's product pages. Not that I can find, anyway.
Anybody know the refresh rate on the latest units in ms?
16 ms. Says so right here.
Originally posted by Towel
16 ms. Says so right here.
Thanks!
Perfect!
I don't know how I missed that page.
-d