17-20 FPS, depending on what's playing and what the visualizer is doing.
Mac OS X 10.1.1
Dual 500 G4
832 MB RAM
(44-92 FPS once I've "tweaked "it!) [quote]If you are allocating abnormal amounts of RAM to iTunes, say so.<hr></blockquote> <img src="graemlins/bugeye.gif" border="0" alt="[Skeptical]" /> Man, memory allocations are so passé!
[edit] Why the **** is this in Current Hardware?? <img src="confused.gif" border="0">
7 - 8 FPS on my 350 Mhz Yikes! G4 w/ 256 MB RAM and 10.1.1. <img src="graemlins/hmmm.gif" border="0" alt="[Hmmm]" /> ...I guess it really is time to upgrade.
<strong>How do you tweak it, Starfleet?</strong><hr></blockquote>
Well, to get those speeds I reniced iTuns to -20, changed the monitor to 16bit, turned on "faster but rougher display", selected "small", and disable full-screen making the window pretty small.
Like I said, it's tweaked but it's pretty useless. It's kinda the same idea of how people get super framerates in FPS's like Q3: they strip it down to butt-ugly config just to impress people with numbers.
I'm going to the Apple store today and will play around with some of the computers there. Will post numbers later. I'm most curious about the new 667 TiBook.
First off, iTunes drops your res to 640x480, 256 colours. AFAIK, there is no way around this, which is annoying. While more colours wouldn't make much of a difference, a higher res looks much nicer.
Second, I use Macast, which Andy O'meara originally coded G-Force for (it was later ported to SoundJam, Winamp, etc). When I fire up G-Force, I actually get a widescreen effect, about 1024x480, as my PBG3 won't switch to lower resolutions. It looks too cool . Anyway, with a 292 mhz PBG3, I got 12-15 FPS, and I currently get 8-12 fps on a 250mhz PBG3.
With an ATI Mach64 Rage LT graphics accelerator, w/ 4MB VRAM.
So I suspect you lot get such lacking fps due to iTunes' processor-hogging syndrome, or PHS for short. This is beeing discussed in another thread.
If I get the same FPS as a much faster imac, w/ better graphics and more video memory, and I'm running at a higher res (1024x480), that's just plain wacky.
<strong>I'm going to the Apple store today and will play around with some of the computers there. Will post numbers later. I'm most curious about the new 667 TiBook.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Comments
Mac OS X 10.1.1
Dual 500 G4
832 MB RAM
(44-92 FPS once I've "tweaked "it!) [quote]If you are allocating abnormal amounts of RAM to iTunes, say so.<hr></blockquote> <img src="graemlins/bugeye.gif" border="0" alt="[Skeptical]" /> Man, memory allocations are so passé!
[edit] Why the **** is this in Current Hardware?? <img src="confused.gif" border="0">
[ 11-16-2001: Message edited by: starfleetX ]</p>
Mac OS X 10.1.1
Dual 800 G4
512 MB RAM
*Non-tweaked
G4 Cube 450Mhz
1.5GB ram
OSX 10.1.1
GeForce2 MX400
How do you 'tweak' iTunes?
moving to software
Pismo 400
<strong>How do you tweak it, Starfleet?</strong><hr></blockquote>
Well, to get those speeds I reniced iTuns to -20, changed the monitor to 16bit, turned on "faster but rougher display", selected "small", and disable full-screen making the window pretty small.
Like I said, it's tweaked but it's pretty useless. It's kinda the same idea of how people get super framerates in FPS's like Q3: they strip it down to butt-ugly config just to impress people with numbers.
[ 11-16-2001: Message edited by: starfleetX ]</p>
- Pook
Second, I use Macast, which Andy O'meara originally coded G-Force for (it was later ported to SoundJam, Winamp, etc). When I fire up G-Force, I actually get a widescreen effect, about 1024x480, as my PBG3 won't switch to lower resolutions. It looks too cool . Anyway, with a 292 mhz PBG3, I got 12-15 FPS, and I currently get 8-12 fps on a 250mhz PBG3.
With an ATI Mach64 Rage LT graphics accelerator, w/ 4MB VRAM.
So I suspect you lot get such lacking fps due to iTunes' processor-hogging syndrome, or PHS for short. This is beeing discussed in another thread.
If I get the same FPS as a much faster imac, w/ better graphics and more video memory, and I'm running at a higher res (1024x480), that's just plain wacky.
<strong>I'm going to the Apple store today and will play around with some of the computers there. Will post numbers later. I'm most curious about the new 667 TiBook.</strong><hr></blockquote>
my 667 tibook is averaging around 13-15 fps.
640 RAM
OSX.1.1
iTunes 2.0.2
25-40 fps
if you want the tweaked numbers like starfleetX's
110-130 fps