do i actually recall someone saying this would happen, especially for indesign files? or did i just want it so bad as to convince myself that it was true?
do i actually recall someone saying this would happen, especially for indesign files? or did i just want it so bad as to convince myself that it was true?
It ought to be in CS2 if Adobe were any good but I think third parties are providing support at the moment. I've got no idea as to Adobe's plans - it would be useful for Illustrator but it's complicated as once you expand text it's technically an image so wouldn't show up in spotlight. It's only really useful in GoLive - which works as it's HTML and inDesign.
If Adobe were truly a partner with Apple, this would of been done by now.
They would also have made a killer photoshop using CoreImage but they haven't. Remember it was Adobe who stated on their web-site you would be better off with a Dell than a Mac - they're not particularly Apple friendly.
Apple did respond that the tests they run were slower on both machines than Final Cut - which was amusing!
They would also have made a killer photoshop using CoreImage but they haven't. Remember it was Adobe who stated on their web-site you would be better off with a Dell than a Mac - they're not particularly Apple friendly.
Apple did respond that the tests they run were slower on both machines than Final Cut - which was amusing!
Adobe, MS and Macromedia are the main reasons for CARBON. Their clout slowed down the adoption of COCOA.
Adobe will never port to Cocoa. They've had 7 years and counting to do so.
Comments
Originally posted by rok
do i actually recall someone saying this would happen, especially for indesign files? or did i just want it so bad as to convince myself that it was true?
It ought to be in CS2 if Adobe were any good but I think third parties are providing support at the moment. I've got no idea as to Adobe's plans - it would be useful for Illustrator but it's complicated as once you expand text it's technically an image so wouldn't show up in spotlight. It's only really useful in GoLive - which works as it's HTML and inDesign.
If Adobe were truly a partner with Apple, this would of been done by now.
I hope Adobe doesn't become the next Quark.
Originally posted by BWhaler
If Adobe were truly a partner with Apple, this would of been done by now.
They would also have made a killer photoshop using CoreImage but they haven't. Remember it was Adobe who stated on their web-site you would be better off with a Dell than a Mac - they're not particularly Apple friendly.
Apple did respond that the tests they run were slower on both machines than Final Cut - which was amusing!
i just need spotlight to see into indesign files and old quark files so i can find old articles we've used.
Originally posted by MacCrazy
They would also have made a killer photoshop using CoreImage but they haven't. Remember it was Adobe who stated on their web-site you would be better off with a Dell than a Mac - they're not particularly Apple friendly.
Apple did respond that the tests they run were slower on both machines than Final Cut - which was amusing!
Adobe, MS and Macromedia are the main reasons for CARBON. Their clout slowed down the adoption of COCOA.
Adobe will never port to Cocoa. They've had 7 years and counting to do so.
With ObjC++ you'd think they'd do it, but nope.