Place your bets
How long before people who think "Norton will get it right this time" start complaining about strange problems / errors popping up on their Macs after using this
<a href="http://VersionTracker.com/moreinfo.fcgi?id=4350" target="_blank">masterpiece of software engineering</a>
If the recent beta is any indication I'll give it two weeks.
<a href="http://VersionTracker.com/moreinfo.fcgi?id=4350" target="_blank">masterpiece of software engineering</a>
If the recent beta is any indication I'll give it two weeks.
Comments
<a href="http://forums.appleinsider.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=5&t=000356" target="_blank">http://forums.appleinsider.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=5&t=000356</a>
<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" />
Drive 10, I have it, but it's largely useless...definitely not worth th $70 it cost. I never really liked the Micromat disk recovery utilities.
DiskWarrior is my favorite disk recovery tool while Norton Speed Disk is my favorite defragger/optimizer.
<strong>What do you expect from a guy who use to wear pink shirts. <img src="graemlins/surprised.gif" border="0" alt="[Surprised]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>
<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> I like your logic!
J
Maybe they've cleaned it up a bit for OS X. Either way, I'm really looking forward to TechTool Pro for X. It has so many more hardware tests and seems to do such a good job of identifying and fixing problems that I won't even consider trying NUM for X at this point. They've long since lost my business and that of many others.
Never tried Drive X, but it seems all anyone ever says of it is what a nice interface it has. If it had defrag capabilities I think more people would use it more otten. Not sure why they left that out.
[ 02-22-2002: Message edited by: Moogs ? ]</p>