Better Artist Classification - iTunes Feature/Hack?
I would like to know if there is a way to take an artist name and put him or her on a "faculty" of an album so that whenever I search for an artist all the albums they are on will pop up. I understand that this feature isn't needed, and wouldn't be used for common "rock" music but for classical and jazz stuff, it would be very helpful. Is there some sort of hack to get this? Is there a way I can suggest to Apple to make such a feature? I went into iTunes and to the link that says provide suggestions but it was for music, not a feature of the actual app.
Thanks!
Thanks!
Comments
Artist/Composer/Comments don't provide the desired flexibility?
There are also the composer and grouping fields you could use as well.
Call me wacky, but it seemed obvious to me?
Let me put this another way... what info *other* than composer/artist are you looking to add?
Most jazz albums do not use a specific name, they simply list the faculty on the CD. I would be fine with that, but sometimes I want to search by musician correlating to the album.
I love smart playlists.
Hmm. While this might be doable, I don't see it happening for one reason - Apple considers the UI on the iPod to be, pretty much, just for playback. This is one reason the UI is so simple... it can get away with it, because the *real* UI is back in iTunes. They're a matched set. iTunes is the modifying, searching, manipulator interface, and the iPod is the on-the-go minimalist playback interface. In theory.
Originally posted by Kickaha
Ah, got it. I was thinking you wanted to search in iTunes, and that works fine, but you're right, on the iPod it is harder. Gotcha.
Hmm. While this might be doable, I don't see it happening for one reason - Apple considers the UI on the iPod to be, pretty much, just for playback. This is one reason the UI is so simple... it can get away with it, because the *real* UI is back in iTunes. They're a matched set. iTunes is the modifying, searching, manipulator interface, and the iPod is the on-the-go minimalist playback interface. In theory.
True, but if John Coltrane is selected on the iPod, his albums show up that are listed as John Coltrane, not Thelonious Monk & John Coltrane Live At Carnegie Hall. That's what I'd really like to have, especially with a car-mounted iPod/headunit to use on 600-miles trips home from college. After so many, it's hard to remember who was on who with what.
Originally posted by Kickaha
Right, I got what you meant. Interesting idea, but it has some underlying gotchas that are legacy issues (such as the file layout mimicing the artist organization...). One to ponder.
Ouch.
Originally posted by Project2501
Other thing that WMP excels in is acquiring artist/record info from internet database, people say that it promotes piracy, but at least people know whose property they are stealing, and maybe if they like it, they know who to promote. WMP is horrible player, but in someways it is still better than iTunes
Select track. Advanced -> Get CD Track Names.
Or is this not what you were talking about?
Originally posted by Project2501
I think windows media player does just that, it uses semicolon to separate different artists in artist tag.
That angers me.
Originally posted by Kickaha
Select track. Advanced -> Get CD Track Names.
Or is this not what you were talking about?
I know that iTunes can fetch names for cd tracks from net, but I was talkin of all music on your machine, those random mp3's as well
Originally posted by iShawn
That angers me.
Why does it anger you? That MS actually made something really useful or that your beloved iTunes doesn't know what to do with tracks named like that?
Originally posted by Project2501
Why does it anger you? That MS actually made something really useful or that your beloved iTunes doesn't know what to do with tracks named like that?
Office has been useful for a long time, until I found everything I need done can be done natively with what comes with my mac out of the box (TextEdit - Word). In my own fantasy; I envisioned iTunes to be able to understand comma separators.
Originally posted by Project2501
I know that iTunes can fetch names for cd tracks from net, but I was talkin of all music on your machine, those random mp3's as well
Right.
I selected a random song in my library, that I'm 99.99999% sure I did not rip from a CD, nor buy at iTMS, and lo and behold, the menu item was available.
Originally posted by Kickaha
Right.
I selected a random song in my library, that I'm 99.99999% sure I did not rip from a CD, nor buy at iTMS, and lo and behold, the menu item was available.
The menu item is available, but when you try to get the info for a track that was not ripped using iTunes, an error message displays:
"iTunes cannot get CD track names for songs that were not imported using iTunes.
To allow iTunes to look for CD track names for this song, import the song again using iTunes."
iTunes 6.0.4
Originally posted by iShawn
In my own fantasy; I envisioned iTunes to be able to understand comma separators.
Ok, I would like to see this feature in iTunes as well, but I think that semicolon is better separator. Comma is actually used in some names so that it wouldn't work correctly all the time. Earth, Wind and Fire for example comes to my mind.
Originally posted by Kishan
The menu item is available, but when you try to get the info for a track that was not ripped using iTunes, an error message displays:
"iTunes cannot get CD track names for songs that were not imported using iTunes.
To allow iTunes to look for CD track names for this song, import the song again using iTunes."
iTunes 6.0.4
Thank you, for moment I started to question my memory, not that this proves anything, but still... ...besides find cd track names would be pretty stupid label for function that fetches info for all kinds of media.
St00pid iTunes.
Originally posted by Project2501
Ok, I would like to see this feature in iTunes as well, but I think that semicolon is better separator. Comma is actually used in some names so that it wouldn't work correctly all the time. Earth, Wind and Fire for example comes to my mind.
I think this is a limitation in the Mac OS. Look around, it is the rare Mac database that has multiple, on-the-fly keywords and categories. (That is one thing I like about Outlook at work. The ability to have multiple categories and not to have to pre-load them into a special permanent list.) If it was easy to have multiple, short lived keywords I think your requested feature would be in placed and used elsewhere.
Of course, I could be wrong.