MarketWatch.com Speculates
They think <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story.asp?print=1&guid={A86544A2-F0AA-4D5C-9C32-58A39E09FF4F}&siteid=yhoo" target="_blank">it might be an updated 20th Anniversary Mac</a>.
Edit: Changed to shorter URL
[ 01-05-2002: Message edited by: glurx ]</p>
Edit: Changed to shorter URL
[ 01-05-2002: Message edited by: glurx ]</p>
Comments
<strong>They think <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story.asp?print=1&guid={A86544A2-F0AA-4D5C-9C32-58A39E09FF4F}&siteid=yhoo" target="_blank">it might be an updated 20th Anniversary Mac</a>.
Edit: Changed to shorter URL
[ 01-05-2002: Message edited by: glurx ]</strong><hr></blockquote>
I REALLY hope it looks like the TAM. It is the most beautiful machine ever built and I would love to own an updated one
-Paul
Edit: typo. sorry JRC
[ 01-05-2002: Message edited by: psantora ]</p>
<strong>Aren't people what have anything to do with the market NOT ALLOWED to speculate?</strong><hr></blockquote>
They are free to speculate all they want - as long as they know nothing. It's only if they have inside information that they can get into trouble. That should tell you what their speculations are worth.
[ 01-05-2002: Message edited by: gfeier ]</p>
<strong>
I REALLY hope it looks like the TAM. It is the most beautiful machine ever built and I would love to own an updated one</strong><hr></blockquote>
I thought it was kinda ugly. It was also insanely over-priced.
<strong>That report was very pessimistic. I hate MARKET speculation, they are always wrong about upcoming announcements.</strong><hr></blockquote>
A pessimistic report by people who are always wrong is a positive sign.
<strong>A lot of people would probably look at any flat-panel display and decide it has a passing resemblance to the TAM.</strong><hr></blockquote>
I agree. What do these guys know? An all-in-one with a flat panel is the main detail they comprehended.
<strong>Aren't people what have anything to do with the market NOT ALLOWED to speculate?
-Paul</strong><hr></blockquote>
Could you rephrase that in the form of an English sentence?
Maybe they'll call it the Silver Anniversary iMac, decked out in a shiny metal enclosure.
I think the new iMac will be very TAM like, with a larger screen, and smaller speakers. Perhaps the optical drive will be a downward loading slot drive.....
SdC
<strong>Apple turned 25 a few days ago.
SdC</strong><hr></blockquote>
The third day of January to be exact. The real birthday party doesn't begin until Monday.
[ 01-05-2002: Message edited by: Nostradamus ]</p>
<strong>
The third day of January to be exact. The real birthday party doesn't begin until Monday.
[ 01-05-2002: Message edited by: Nostradamus ]</strong><hr></blockquote>
Apple was founded April 1st 1976.
<strong>
Could you rephrase that in the form of an English sentence?</strong><hr></blockquote>
it was a simple typo replace w in what with a t and it will make perfect (err maybe just better) sense....
-Paul
<strong>
Apple was founded April 1st 1976.</strong><hr></blockquote>
I think they are reffering to date of incorperation which seems to be Jan 3rd 1977? I don't know, it was (is?) on AtAT, thats where I am getting this from...
-Paul
<strong>
Apple was founded April 1st 1976.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Yeah but it was incorporated on 3rd January 1977.
[quote]Apple Computer,Â*Inc. ("Apple" or the "Company") was incorporated under the laws of the state of California on JanuaryÂ*3, 1977. The Company designs, manufactures and markets personal computers and related personal computing and communicating solutions for sale primarily to education, creative, consumer, and business customers. Substantially all of the Company's net sales over the last five years have been derived from the sale of its Apple® Macintosh® line of personal computers and related software and peripherals.<hr></blockquote>
I got it
<strong>
I thought it was kinda ugly. It was also insanely over-priced.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Yeah, it was WAY overpriced. I thought it was pretty cool looking.