Why no 3.20 & 3.73 GHz options for the Mac Pro's?

Posted:
in Current Mac Hardware edited January 2014
On Dell's website, their Precision 690 workstations can be outfitted with optional 3.20 GHz and 3.73 GHz Xeon chips. Where is this option for the Mac Pro's?



Dave

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 9
    a_greera_greer Posts: 4,594member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Dave K.


    On Dell's website, their Precision 690 workstations can be outfitted with optional 3.20 GHz and 3.73 GHz Xeon chips. Where is this option for the Mac Pro's?



    Dave



    This is Apples first Intel desktop, the iMac is nothing but a stationary laptop; they probably wanted to limit some of those options untill they know that their manufacturing process is online 100%, going all-bto is a huge change for Apple. I would look for them at the same time the xServes launch.
  • Reply 2 of 9
    placeboplacebo Posts: 5,767member
    Uh, could it also be that those are 5000 series CPUs instead of the lower-clocked but in fact faster 5100 series Xeons that the Mac Pro and Xserves use? Think the difference between a 4.0GHz P4 and a 2.66GHz Core 2 Duo: the 2.66 is gonna be faster.



    I'm thinking that there aren't even any Xeon 5100s in production yet beyond 3.0GHz.
  • Reply 3 of 9
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Placebo


    Uh, could it also be that those are 5000 series CPUs instead of the lower-clocked but in fact faster 5100 series Xeons that the Mac Pro and Xserves use? Think the difference between a 4.0GHz P4 and a 2.66GHz Core 2 Duo: the 2.66 is gonna be faster.



    I'm thinking that there aren't even any Xeon 5100s in production yet beyond 3.0GHz.



    Bingo!



    Everything Placebo said. (To back ya up.)
  • Reply 4 of 9
    placeboplacebo Posts: 5,767member
    Thanks mate.
  • Reply 5 of 9
    For the record, there will be a 3.2 GHz Woodcrest at some point. It is supposedly coming out with the Kentsfields and Clovertowns (so it may be Nov., or it may still be Jan.) So we may see that in due time, but Placebo is correct.
  • Reply 6 of 9
    icfireballicfireball Posts: 2,594member
    They also might have assumed it would be too expensive for users to be interested
  • Reply 7 of 9
    placeboplacebo Posts: 5,767member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by icfireball


    They also might have assumed it would be too expensive for users to be interested



    We're talking about an Apple workstation that's already configurable up to $16,000.
  • Reply 8 of 9
    a_greera_greer Posts: 4,594member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Placebo


    Uh, could it also be that those are 5000 series CPUs instead of the lower-clocked but in fact faster 5100 series Xeons that the Mac Pro and Xserves use? Think the difference between a 4.0GHz P4 and a 2.66GHz Core 2 Duo: the 2.66 is gonna be faster.



    I'm thinking that there aren't even any Xeon 5100s in production yet beyond 3.0GHz.



    ooooo great catch...
  • Reply 9 of 9
    a_greera_greer Posts: 4,594member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Placebo


    We're talking about an Apple workstation that's already configurable up to $16,000.



    Yes, but $16,200 is just too much!
Sign In or Register to comment.