I think MWSF with true 8 core processors. Not the kensington/clovertown 4+4 = 8 solution. Apple will be first with the real deal. That processor is also supposed have an ODMC which should give intel the same advantagous of some of AMD's processors.
I think MWSF with true 8 core processors. Not the kensington/clovertown 4+4 = 8 solution. Apple will be first with the real deal. That processor is also supposed have an ODMC which should give intel the same advantagous of some of AMD's processors.
I've posted here maybe 5 times. I stuck my question under "future hardware".. made sense to me at the time.
People who take forums personally...
A more constructive comment would have been.. Hey.. I see you are new here.. generally.. we like to keep like discussions in one thread. Please follow that thinking from now on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregmightdothat
When you have a one sentence post, that makes no sense without bringing up another thread,
don't you think it might've been a good idea to, I dunno, just post this in that thread?
I've posted here maybe 5 times. I stuck my question under "future hardware".. made sense to me at the time.
People who take forums personally...
A more constructive comment would have been.. Hey.. I see you are new here.. generally.. we like to keep like discussions in one thread. Please follow that thinking from now on.
Comments
In response to Dell's What?
(I say that because Dell is also shipping on the 14th.)
http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=2214
When you have a one sentence post, that makes no sense without bringing up another thread,
don't you think it might've been a good idea to, I dunno, just post this in that thread?
I think MWSF with true 8 core processors. Not the kensington/clovertown 4+4 = 8 solution. Apple will be first with the real deal. That processor is also supposed have an ODMC which should give intel the same advantagous of some of AMD's processors.
When you have a one sentence post, that makes no sense without bringing up another thread,
don't you think it might've been a good idea to, I dunno, just post this in that thread?
Greg isn't the only one that might do that.
I've posted here maybe 5 times. I stuck my question under "future hardware".. made sense to me at the time.
People who take forums personally...
A more constructive comment would have been.. Hey.. I see you are new here.. generally.. we like to keep like discussions in one thread. Please follow that thinking from now on.
When you have a one sentence post, that makes no sense without bringing up another thread,
don't you think it might've been a good idea to, I dunno, just post this in that thread?
Look Mate,
I've posted here maybe 5 times. I stuck my question under "future hardware".. made sense to me at the time.
People who take forums personally...
A more constructive comment would have been.. Hey.. I see you are new here.. generally.. we like to keep like discussions in one thread. Please follow that thinking from now on.
No, that would be a gentler, more polite post
They're both equally constructive.
No, that would be a gentler, more polite post
They're both equally constructive.