Millions vs. Thousands Colors

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in Mac Software edited January 2014
I dunno if this is really a software question, but oh well... Is there a big difference between millions and thousands of colors for the display? I don't really see any big differences or performance differances. Does anyone know which I should use for my iBook?

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 18
    zozo Posts: 3,117member
    if you do any kind of picture viewing or creation/maipulation, you want millions of colors.



    Go to some site with pictures, prefereable hi-res. and set to thousands of colors. They look a bit spotty. Then just change the color depth to millions, and you'll see right away that it looks better.



    If you just do word processing, mail, normal web browsing... then it doesnt really matter that much.



    I have to say that in 10.1.x on my iBook 600 8MB vram putting to thousands of colors would make a difference in speed. Now in 10.2 Ive always had it at millions and there is basically no difference in speed.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 18
    thanks
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 18
    Can I just throw in that if you have an iBook or any G3 with low RAM, using OS X in thousands of colors will improve performance with the OS. It won't seem as doggy. This is mostly applicable to education, where OS X is just starting to get exposure.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 18
    lucaluca Posts: 3,833member
    I haven't really done any comparative tests, but I haven't noticed any difference between thousands and millions of colors, and this is on a 233 MHz G3 with a 4MB Rage Pro video card.



    Maybe it's because it's very slow on both, or maybe it's because it doesn't make much of a difference. Either way, I always find it works better in millions, in all situations. Almost everything looks better that way.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 18
    If you have it set on millions of colours your monitor actually displays higher colour depth than the human eye can see! So from our point of view it's actually an infinite number of colours.



    Andrew
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 18
    lucaluca Posts: 3,833member
    Perhaps... I've heard that 32 bit color, not 24 bit color, is truly an "infinite" amount of color (24 bit is 16 million, 32 bit is 4 billion). Although you can't tell the difference between one color and the next hue brighter/darker or whatever, some people can see a tiny amount of dithering (is that what it's called?) on really gradual color changes, like CG smoke. Not really enough to matter. In thousands of colors, though (16 bit), there is quite a bit of graininess present.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 18
    eugeneeugene Posts: 8,254member
    32-bit color is 8-bits red, 8-bits green, 8-bits blue and 8-bits wasted.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 18
    ebbyebby Posts: 3,110member
    Isn't there an alpha channel in there somewhere?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 18
    overhopeoverhope Posts: 1,123member
    Not on RGB displays...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 18
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    I never could tell the difference between the two so that's why I use only thousands.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 18
    airslufairsluf Posts: 1,861member
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 18
    eugeneeugene Posts: 8,254member
    [quote]Originally posted by EmAn:

    <strong>I never could tell the difference between the two so that's why I use only thousands.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Surely you can tell the difference. Select a solid colored desktop background like "Solid Gray" and look at the dithering. Look at the drop shadows. the human eye can easily discren more than 65536 colors.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 18
    FYI, the human eye can differentiate between millions of colors, but in a relative manner, not in absolute terms. That is, you have to see a lot of them side by side to see the differences.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 18
    nijiniji Posts: 288member
    biggest difference to me on an iBook dual is that the grey pinstripes of os x,running thousands of colours, is terrible. you need to run millions in order for it to be less pronounced.

    thnx



    [ 09-23-2002: Message edited by: niji ]</p>
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 18
    I notice almost no difference in speed on my G3 Powerbook at all. I just keep it set at millions.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 18
    Would I be out of line by saying that I hope they dump the "pinstripe" look in 10.3 Panther....much like they did in the dock for 10.2?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 18
    I noticed a difference when Quartz Extreme kicked in. I was always using Thousands up to that time. But suddenly, I discovered that Quartz Extreme doesn't like Thousands. With Millions the QE text engine is way better. So it's not just about colors any more. It's text rendering now. Ironicly, Millions is faster and sharper text than Thousands to my experience.



    Anyone else notice that?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 18
    spartspart Posts: 2,060member
    [quote]Originally posted by EmAn:

    <strong>I never could tell the difference between the two so that's why I use only thousands.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Are you completely colorblind?



    Thousands looks horrible...even on LCD displays, and your iBook has one of the better ones.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.